|
Post by naughtyfox on Dec 19, 2018 8:48:45 GMT
carry on film humour is awful
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2018 8:50:17 GMT
I wondered what Martin had stirred up this time He is a menace to Society and obviously has to much time to idle away now that he's a pensioner. Old people are a nuisance. God help us when you retire, nobody will get a word in.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Dec 19, 2018 8:51:56 GMT
Mike was behaving in his usual twatish way and I called him out on it. How childish.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2018 9:10:23 GMT
Lady G now suggests it is three strikes and you are out, patently not true, it seems one can be banned immediately having received no prior points at all. It also seems a tad unfair that mods can have right of reply (and in a locked thread) but the same courtesy isnt offered to members. I get that threads would likely develop into a brawl if so, but at least a chance to explain the injustice of an immediate ban could be given. They can do both. Ie ban somebody instantly or if you accumulate 3 formal warnings before expiry a ban kicks in too. At least that is my understanding.
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Dec 19, 2018 9:12:57 GMT
Lady G now suggests it is three strikes and you are out, patently not true, it seems one can be banned immediately having received no prior points at all. Either is an option. Anyway, Lady Garden is now implying it was all a mistake. Which is fair enough.
|
|
|
Post by phil70 on Dec 19, 2018 9:16:49 GMT
He is a menace to Society and obviously has to much time to idle away now that he's a pensioner. Old people are a nuisance. God help us when you retire, nobody will get a word in. Just wet myself laughing, the thought of the witch pushing a ga-ga Foxy around Phil
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2018 9:17:05 GMT
Lady G now suggests it is three strikes and you are out, patently not true, it seems one can be banned immediately having received no prior points at all. Either is an option. Anyway, Lady Garden is now implying it was all a mistake. Which is fair enough. Except I can’t see the word sorry anywhere. It’s lady C all over again!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2018 9:19:02 GMT
Oh, I see. I don't wear glasses. I bet you still use floppy disks though?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2018 9:27:11 GMT
Lady G now suggests it is three strikes and you are out, patently not true, it seems one can be banned immediately having received no prior points at all. It also seems a tad unfair that mods can have right of reply (and in a locked thread) but the same courtesy isnt offered to members. I get that threads would likely develop into a brawl if so, but at least a chance to explain the injustice of an immediate ban could be given. Ah; but - you would then take away the teacher and naughty pupil element that seems to be the basis of the moderation on CWDF - don't question me boy, do as I say, I know best etc NB Lola NB Lola Moderator Donate to Canal World 43 1581 posts Gender:Male Boat Name:NB Lola Report post #7 Posted 1 hour ago I thought I had mike, let me check, should be easy. Not so, cannot find the linked report. You have no restrictions applied and I will happily remove any points awarded if i have not explained why. In the meantime, I will lock this thread to avoid the usual diatribe
LadyG LadyG Moderator Donate to Canal World 184 1710 posts Gender:Female Location:scotland Report post #8 Posted 26 minutes ago (edited) Morning forum members, custom and practice dictates that pm s twixt a moderator and a forum member remain private, however in this instance I am going to publish the pm I sent MtB late last night. QUOTE "I was trying to look at your warning points, to adjust them [don't ask me why] but I seem to have increased them! A mod sees the site different from you, so maybe you have zeroed out. If not I will ask the site administrator to sort it sorry about that! jo" UNQUOTE I had been looking at the warnings on Mike's profile,, but not in order to apply warnings, either advisory [friendly and informal], or formal warning points [the three strikes and your out type] I think my "looking" triggered the first warning complained of, and my attempt ro delete it triggered the second. I am really not sure if those are the "two warnings" MtB complains of, I thought I had explained in my pm. MB Lola has been on this morning and confirms that MTB has no restrictions applied so if anyone can't pm him, it may be for another reason. PS, MtB is a great guy, and I hope he will forgive and forget. I can't do any more. To be clear as possible I have never intentionally given him any sort of warning. He does not have any forum restrictions applied. Edited 13 minutes ago by LadyG Guest A lot of guff about sod all, bar for the desire to keep the members inline with their nebulous outlook on the world.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2018 9:52:20 GMT
All that little lot shows or indeed confirms is that as long as you don't post on here you can pretty well act with virtual impunity on there.
The inconsistency in moderation is pretty stark between those that post on here and those that dont.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Dec 19, 2018 9:52:47 GMT
If I were MTB I'd pick that quote up and get it in the sig. "PS, MtB is a great Guy" Lady G.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Dec 19, 2018 9:59:35 GMT
Well, the HS2 thread is now locked. Guess who was involved? The two Ms. Need their heads banging together, as my Mum would have said!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2018 10:11:46 GMT
All that little lot shows or indeed confirms is that as long as you don't post on here you can pretty well act with virtual impunity on there. The inconsistency in moderation is pretty stark between those that post on here and those that dont. It was going on way before this forum was started, so I doubt it’s just about posting here (but it probably helps!)
|
|
|
Post by bills on Dec 19, 2018 10:23:09 GMT
I dunno. I post on here and I have -1 (yes that's right, minus 1) warning points over there.
anyway - come across and join Michael, you would be welcome (as long as you don't do these annoying baby talk wrong spellings when you want to seem cute).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2018 10:40:20 GMT
All that little lot shows or indeed confirms is that as long as you don't post on here you can pretty well act with virtual impunity on there. The inconsistency in moderation is pretty stark between those that post on here and those that dont. It was going on way before this forum was started, so I doubt it’s just about posting here (but it probably helps!) How else would you explain that two posters have a spat (me and the plumber) and one ends up with a formal warning and a 24 hour posting restriction and the other gets their warning lifted and a gushing endorsement from Lady Gaga. I guess there is another possible reason but I dont think her and him are an item?
|
|