|
Post by Mr Stabby on Feb 3, 2019 19:58:55 GMT
What Jim said. I met three crews last year who had been unable to get on to the Llangollen because they got stuck in the lock at Hurlestone, and according to the volockies there, it's a daily experience. I hope you've no plans to try getting your boat up there, . . after all, you have more than enough difficulties with gaps that are 178' 2'' wider than this lock. Ah, while you're here, I haven't heard anything from the no-win, no-fee libel lawyer yet. Have you any idea when I'm likely to receive his letter as I'm off cruising next month and it will be far easier for all concerned if I can deal with it before I set off?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2019 20:00:05 GMT
No win. No fee. QED
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Feb 3, 2019 20:28:57 GMT
The thing is, why do they keep choosing their fight on threads I've started? Phhffttt.!
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on Feb 3, 2019 20:37:03 GMT
I hope you've no plans to try getting your boat up there, . . after all, you have more than enough difficulties with gaps that are 178' 2'' wider than this lock. Ah, while you're here, I haven't heard anything from the no-win, no-fee libel lawyer yet. Have you any idea when I'm likely to receive his letter as I'm off cruising next month and it will be far easier for all concerned if I can deal with it before I set off? It's good news for you, because you won't be hearing anything from them. They've looked through your postings and come to the conclusion that no right thinking person is going to take anything you write seriously enough for it to do any significant harm to anybody's reputation, standing, or business. Apparently, Courts will only order substantial defamation damages awards against those who publish credible libel, and themselves possess reasonable levels of credibility. They also pointed out, incidentally, that a significant proportion of your more mindless content is in serious breach of ProBoards T&C's, and has the potential to cause serious problems for Thunderboat, . . should it come to their (ProBoards) attention.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Feb 3, 2019 20:40:37 GMT
Ah, while you're here, I haven't heard anything from the no-win, no-fee libel lawyer yet. Have you any idea when I'm likely to receive his letter as I'm off cruising next month and it will be far easier for all concerned if I can deal with it before I set off? It's good news for you, because you won't be hearing anything from them. They've looked through your postings and come to the conclusion that no right thinking person is going to take anything you write seriously enough for it to do any significant harm to anybody's reputation, standing, or business. Apparently, Courts will only order substantial defamation damages awards against those who publish credible libel, and themselves possess reasonable levels of credibility. They also pointed out, incidentally, that a significant proportion of your more mindless content is in serious breach of ProBoards T&C's, and has the potential to cause serious problems for Thunderboat, . . should it come to their (ProBoards) attention. Or in other words, you never spoke to any type of lawyer at all, other than in your imagination, and you are just full of shit. Would that be right?
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Feb 3, 2019 20:55:30 GMT
The thing is, why do they keep choosing their fight on threads I've started? Phhffttt.! <iframe width="26.09999999999991" height="4.199999999999989" style="position: absolute; width: 26.09999999999991px; height: 4.199999999999989px; z-index: -9999; border-style: none;left: 15px; top: -5px;" id="MoatPxIOPT0_35997369" scrolling="no"></iframe> <iframe width="26.09999999999991" height="4.199999999999989" style="position: absolute; width: 26.1px; height: 4.2px; z-index: -9999; border-style: none; left: 1242px; top: -5px;" id="MoatPxIOPT0_39217209" scrolling="no"></iframe> <iframe width="26.09999999999991" height="4.199999999999989" style="position: absolute; width: 26.1px; height: 4.2px; z-index: -9999; border-style: none; left: 15px; top: 101px;" id="MoatPxIOPT0_86992596" scrolling="no"></iframe> <iframe width="26.09999999999991" height="4.199999999999989" style="position: absolute; width: 26.1px; height: 4.2px; z-index: -9999; border-style: none; left: 1242px; top: 101px;" id="MoatPxIOPT0_12409825" scrolling="no"></iframe> You'd have to ask Dickhead Dunkley that. As per usual, he has popped up on a thread which has no relevance whatsoever to my 2018 cruising pattern to try to have a dig at me simply because I supported Ricco in his decision to get his engine looked at by someone who knew what he was doing, and as usual I have had to bitch-slap him.
|
|
|
Post by patty on Feb 3, 2019 21:03:42 GMT
The thing is, why do they keep choosing their fight on threads I've started? Phhffttt.! maybe you start more threads than anyone else?..I mean i dunno if u do as I do not keep a tally..
|
|
|
Post by patty on Feb 3, 2019 21:20:44 GMT
Surely its time for Tony n Vince to bury the hatchet ..don't expect them to smoke pipe of peace but all this having a pop at each other is tad uncomfortable reading..I'm skimming more n more posts .. Maybe they could start their own thread which then I could just avoid like I do the Rugby thread...
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Feb 3, 2019 21:36:19 GMT
Surely its time for Tony n Vince to bury the hatchet ..don't expect them to smoke pipe of peace but all this having a pop at each other is tad uncomfortable reading.. Who started it? Who always starts it, popping up on random posts to have a dig for no reason whatsoever? For as long as he carries on doing that, I will carry on responding. Tony Dunkley is a thief, a liar and a confidence trickster and my greatest hope is that CRT win their current court action against him and get the thieving, lying piece of shit off of the waterways.
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on Feb 4, 2019 9:40:05 GMT
Tony Dunkley is a thief, a liar and a confidence trickster and my greatest hope is that CRT win their current court action against him and get the thieving, lying piece of shit off of the waterways. They've looked through your postings and come to the conclusion that no right thinking person is going to take anything you write seriously enough for it to do any significant harm to anybody's reputation, standing, or business. Apparently, Courts will only order substantial defamation damages awards against those who publish credible libel, and themselves possess reasonable levels of credibility. They also pointed out, incidentally, that a significant proportion of your more mindless content is in serious breach of ProBoards T&C's, and has the potential to cause serious problems for Thunderboat, . . . . . . . .
. . . . and for those without the wit to understand what is meant by "more mindless content", . . here is an example :- Feb 3, 2019 Mr Stabby said: Tony Dunkley is a thief, a liar and a confidence trickster and my greatest hope is that CRT win their current court action against him and get the thieving, lying piece of shit off of the waterways.The relevant paragraph from ProBoards Terms of Service :- 18. OBJECTIONABLE CONTENT
You represent and warrant that you shall not use the Website or Services to upload, post, transmit, display, perform or distribute any content, information or materials that: (a) are libelous, defamatory, abusive, . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Feb 4, 2019 18:39:26 GMT
What Jim said. I met three crews last year who had been unable to get on to the Llangollen because they got stuck in the lock at Hurlestone, and according to the volockies there, it's a daily experience. I hope you've no plans to try getting your boat up there, . . after all, you have more than enough difficulties with gaps that are 178' 2'' wider than this lock. Oooh! I wouldn't stand for that Mrs Tabby. Best go and sit in a corner.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Feb 4, 2019 19:47:02 GMT
I hope you've no plans to try getting your boat up there, . . after all, you have more than enough difficulties with gaps that are 178' 2'' wider than this lock. Oooh! I wouldn't stand for that Mrs Tabby. Best go and sit in a corner.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Feb 4, 2019 21:53:42 GMT
I hope you've no plans to try getting your boat up there, . . after all, you have more than enough difficulties with gaps that are 178' 2'' wider than this lock. Oooh! I wouldn't stand for that Mrs Tabby. Best go and sit in a corner. Occasionally making contact with the infrastructure is an occupational hazard when you actually go boating, same as being taken to court by CRT is an occupational hazard when all you ever do is move your boat from its mooring to the towpath opposite and then back again two weeks later, as I'm sure Dickhead Dunkley will confirm.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Feb 5, 2019 10:56:36 GMT
Oooh! I wouldn't stand for that Mrs Tabby. Best go and sit in a corner. same as being taken to court by CRT is an occupational hazard when all you ever do is move your boat from its mooring to the towpath opposite and then back again two weeks later, as I'm sure Dickhead Dunkley will confirm. The movement pattern you describe here is actually legal if you have a mooring. So it wouldn't result in you being taken to court.
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on Feb 5, 2019 18:26:31 GMT
Oooh! I wouldn't stand for that Mrs Tabby. Best go and sit in a corner. Occasionally making contact with the infrastructure is an occupational hazard when you actually go boating, same as being taken to court by CRT is an occupational hazard when all you ever do is move your boat from its mooring to the towpath opposite and then back again two weeks later, as I'm sure Dickhead Dunkley will confirm. I'm fairly sure that this is the second time you've deployed this same inane response when reminded of last year's incident at Blackfriars Bridge, and it begs a question which someone with any concern or thought for the safety of others really should answer :- If you genuinely believe that the situation you were led into through the combined efforts of C&RT, the PLA, and your own lack of the requisite experience was as minor and inconsequential as you seem to think it was, then why were you so reluctant for the incident, and more importantly the circumstances that led up to it, to be reported in detail to the PLA so they could take the necessary steps to avoid repeats of what was in truth a highly dangerous incident from which you were very lucky to escape without serious damage, injury, or worse ?
|
|