|
Post by kris on Aug 9, 2016 4:49:15 GMT
We don't care who you are,just glad that your contributing to the forum. its that "Royal we " again. Your not the spokesperson speak for yourself. Mind you I see you fit with the thread title perfectly.
|
|
|
Post by haulierp on Aug 9, 2016 5:32:41 GMT
We don't care who you are,just glad that your contributing to the forum. its that "Royal we " again. Your not the spokesperson speak for yourself. Mind you I see you fit with the thread title perfectly. Well Johnv has expressed his appreciation of Tomsk and his contribution and so have I so that clearly means We in the English Language. You always seem to have a problem don't you,a perfectly innocent comment that lets face it,others will be sure to agree with and here you are making your displeasure known simply because I am the one expressing it.
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Aug 9, 2016 6:48:17 GMT
Pontificating experts or out and out liars?
One of those still posting with "expert" advice - I can't comment on how correct that is as I am an "ignorance fascist" (according to his best buddy on CWDF some time ago) - was so aggressive towards me online that I very nearly cancelled work I had booked at "his" marina for fear of having to confront him ...........
I got brave and went anyway - wielding my angle grinder at any incoming arseholes.... Guess what - he doesn't even moor there - has a much cheaper mooring many, many miles away (much less prestigious a boat than implied, too).
What a wonderful world the internet is!
Edit : no disrespect to the real experts - we all need you sometimes You poor, poor darling. Still traumatised I see. Counselling? Anyway that is what happens to (s)he would can give out grief, insult and sarcasm but can't take it.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Aug 9, 2016 7:48:38 GMT
its that "Royal we " again. Your not the spokesperson speak for yourself. Mind you I see you fit with the thread title perfectly. Well Johnv has expressed his appreciation of Tomsk and his contribution and so have I so that clearly means We in the English Language. You always seem to have a problem don't you,a perfectly innocent comment that lets face it,others will be sure to agree with and here you are making your displeasure known simply because I am the one expressing it. no shit Sherlock, that must have taker your massive interlect to work out. So John asked you to comment for him did he?
|
|
|
Post by haulierp on Aug 9, 2016 8:03:15 GMT
Well Johnv has expressed his appreciation of Tomsk and his contribution and so have I so that clearly means We in the English Language. You always seem to have a problem don't you,a perfectly innocent comment that lets face it,others will be sure to agree with and here you are making your displeasure known simply because I am the one expressing it. no shit Sherlock, that must have taker your massive interlect to work out. So John asked you to comment for him did he? inter who ?
|
|
|
Post by kris on Aug 9, 2016 8:21:03 GMT
Why not address the issue I've pointed out. Your not content to talk for your self. You've made yourself the self appointed spokesperson for the board.
|
|
|
Post by haulierp on Aug 9, 2016 9:29:35 GMT
Why not address the issue I've pointed out. Your not content to talk for your self. You've made yourself the self appointed spokesperson for the board. Once again your intent on causing upset where before there was none.Could anyone on here accuse me of not talking for myself ? I don't think so. Where have I made myself the self appointed spokesperson for anyone ? nowhere. Like I say,you have the issue,noone else.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 9, 2016 9:48:35 GMT
Why not address the issue I've pointed out. Your not content to talk for your self. You've made yourself the self appointed spokesperson for the board. Once again your intent on causing upset where before there was none.Could anyone on here accuse me of not talking for myself ? I don't think so. Where have I made myself the self appointed spokesperson for anyone ? nowhere. Like I say,you have the issue,noone else. You do use 'we' when you mean 'I' sometimes Paul, but it's not the end of the wor
|
|
|
Post by kris on Aug 9, 2016 10:07:24 GMT
Why not address the issue I've pointed out. Your not content to talk for your self. You've made yourself the self appointed spokesperson for the board. Once again your intent on causing upset where before there was none.Could anyone on here accuse me of not talking for myself ? I don't think so. Where have I made myself the self appointed spokesperson for anyone ? nowhere. Like I say,you have the issue,noone else. another brilliant piece of deduction from an amazing interlect. I've pointed out to you that it's something that you do, I know it's just a sympton of your overbearing, highly opinionated irritating manner. But I'm still going to pull you up on it because I can.
|
|
|
Post by haulierp on Aug 9, 2016 10:10:46 GMT
Once again your intent on causing upset where before there was none.Could anyone on here accuse me of not talking for myself ? I don't think so. Where have I made myself the self appointed spokesperson for anyone ? nowhere. Like I say,you have the issue,noone else. You do use 'we' when you mean 'I' sometimes Paul, but it's not the end of the wor It is for some people.
|
|
|
Post by haulierp on Aug 9, 2016 10:11:34 GMT
Once again your intent on causing upset where before there was none.Could anyone on here accuse me of not talking for myself ? I don't think so. Where have I made myself the self appointed spokesperson for anyone ? nowhere. Like I say,you have the issue,noone else. another brilliant piece of deduction from an amazing interlect. I've pointed out to you that it's something that you do, I know it's just a sympton of your overbearing, highly opinionated irritating manner. But I'm still going to pull you up on it because I can. Inter who ?
|
|
|
Post by Andyberg on Aug 9, 2016 10:17:12 GMT
. But I'm still going to pull you up on it because I can. And long may it continue Kris
Daily episodes of 'The Thunderboat Little n Large' show makes visiting here worthwhile!
|
|
|
Post by haulierp on Aug 9, 2016 10:18:33 GMT
Once again your intent on causing upset where before there was none.Could anyone on here accuse me of not talking for myself ? I don't think so. Where have I made myself the self appointed spokesperson for anyone ? nowhere. Like I say,you have the issue,noone else. You do use 'we' when you mean 'I' sometimes Paul, but it's not the end of the wor I appeal to you Bassplayer as being a reasonable man,irrespective of where your sympathies are. The context in which I used WE in this instance I have already explained earlier in the thread,it was grammatically correct,it was factually correct but has still caused umbrage to our friend. Who cares
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 9, 2016 10:41:19 GMT
You do use 'we' when you mean 'I' sometimes Paul, but it's not the end of the wor I appeal to you Bassplayer as being a reasonable man,irrespective of where your sympathies are. The context in which I used WE in this instance I have already explained earlier in the thread,it was grammatically correct,it was factually correct but has still caused umbrage to our friend. Who cares I was being general really. Sometimes people drag others into an argument to bolster up thier credibilty. I've probably done it myself at times. The thing is, I doubt anyone on this forum is not capable of seeing through any personal clashes and see the merit of any post. I'd happily have a pint with you or Kris, but not at the same time. Why can't you both sort this out through PM's or something. You might be very different personalities but life is too short. Something must have triggered this when you met. Having said that, ignore is sometimes the only option. For that, you BOTH have to ignore eachother to avoid re-triggering conflict. Well unless you like the conflict of course. Well that's my thoughts anyway.
|
|
|
Post by haulierp on Aug 9, 2016 11:43:18 GMT
I appeal to you Bassplayer as being a reasonable man,irrespective of where your sympathies are. The context in which I used WE in this instance I have already explained earlier in the thread,it was grammatically correct,it was factually correct but has still caused umbrage to our friend. Who cares I was being general really. Sometimes people drag others into an argument to bolster up thier credibilty. I've probably done it myself at times. The thing is, I doubt anyone on this forum is not capable of seeing through any personal clashes and see the merit of any post. I'd happily have a pint with you or Kris, but not at the same time. Why can't you both sort this out through PM's or something. You might be very different personalities but life is too short. Something must have triggered this when you met. Having said that, ignore is sometimes the only option. For that, you BOTH have to ignore eachother to avoid re-triggering conflict. Well unless you like the conflict of course. Well that's my thoughts anyway. I certainly don't need to drag you into any argument to bolster my credibility so lets both be clear on that score. You commented initially and I merely invited further comment and as usual you reply with a pointless diatribe. Lets not loose sight of this mornings Trigger Point which was my using the word WE in a correct context,I ask for your opinion as you had already commented and I get the rubbish above.
|
|