|
Post by patty on May 4, 2019 9:10:12 GMT
Looking through the thread, the evidence allows me to rest my case. 😂 err what case?... was there a theme to this thread? oops!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2019 10:17:04 GMT
The theme was as per title. The OP would like this forum to be more like canalworld.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on May 4, 2019 10:18:07 GMT
Someone has deleted a post as jenlyn's last comment was originally at the top of this Page 3.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on May 4, 2019 11:46:39 GMT
Someone has deleted a post as jenlyn's last comment was originally at the top of this Page 3. <iframe style="position: absolute; width: 29.40000000000009px; height: 2.9000000000000057px; z-index: -9999; border-style: none;left: 15px; top: -5px;" id="MoatPxIOPT0_80538995" scrolling="no" width="29.40000000000009" height="2.9000000000000057"></iframe> <iframe style="position: absolute; width: 29.4px; height: 2.9px; z-index: -9999; border-style: none; left: 1405px; top: -5px;" id="MoatPxIOPT0_59639824" scrolling="no" width="29.40000000000009" height="2.9000000000000057"></iframe> <iframe style="position: absolute; width: 29.4px; height: 2.9px; z-index: -9999; border-style: none; left: 15px; top: 86px;" id="MoatPxIOPT0_96599832" scrolling="no" width="29.40000000000009" height="2.9000000000000057"></iframe> <iframe style="position: absolute; width: 29.4px; height: 2.9px; z-index: -9999; border-style: none; left: 1405px; top: 86px;" id="MoatPxIOPT0_18845186" scrolling="no" width="29.40000000000009" height="2.9000000000000057"></iframe> Sorry about that, thought no one would notice. You are being watched.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2019 21:10:25 GMT
I'm surprised we don't get a lot more cwdf members, given several here behave in a manner that they profess to have been the reason for leaving there. Destroying threads seems to be the favourite. One or two here appear to spend most of their day doing so. Hence my observation. We do have a couple that regularly throw totally out of context remarks into the mix but I would have said that the majority of "thread drift" is just that and hardly wrecking. We have also recently had a poster who was totally outside reasonable bounds (and was thoroughly chewed out for it) but I would have to say, generally I can't agree with your post. (that presuming that I have not missed something)If you were referring to your thread with the (excellent) pictures and the argument over identification, I would have thought that reasonable, especially as they presented evidence to support their belief. Hardly thread wrecking (IMHO It was not done in an aggressive or unreasonable manner) Certainly, it did not impinge on my enjoyment of the photos If you are true to your word John you wont see this, but WTF are you on about when you talk about 'being chewed out for it'?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2019 21:18:25 GMT
Not wishing to speak for John (he doesn't need anyones help) but more to support the 'obviousness' of his comment ... an example would be donkey's utterly unnecessary and malicious comments to Trina re the death of her cat. He was rightly reviled for his cruelty. Other instances could be mentioned ... it's not difficult to comprehend what was meant Rog
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2019 21:23:18 GMT
Just to clarify the above post was a response to a post I have since deleted.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2019 21:32:11 GMT
Not wishing to speak for John (he doesn't need anyones help) but more to support the 'obviousness' of his comment ... an example would be donkey's utterly unnecessary and malicious comments to Trina re the death of her cat. He was rightly reviled for his cruelty. Other instances could be mentioned ... it's not difficult to comprehend what was meant Rog I would rather see him comment for himself. To clarify what he actually meant. But of course we never will.
|
|
|
Post by Trina on May 4, 2019 21:35:11 GMT
Not wishing to speak for John (he doesn't need anyones help) but more to support the 'obviousness' of his comment ... an example would be donkey's utterly unnecessary and malicious comments to Trina re the death of her cat. He was rightly reviled for his cruelty. Other instances could be mentioned ... it's not difficult to comprehend what was meant Rog Donkey-now known as Jude.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2019 21:35:49 GMT
He'll be along ... you're just being obtuse ... what a surprise Rog
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2019 21:37:45 GMT
He'll be along ... you're just being obtuse ... what a surprise Rog Obtuse? What is obtuse about stating someone who has you on ignore wont see your posts? Please explain.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2019 21:42:21 GMT
Usually around 7.30am.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2019 21:44:42 GMT
We do have a couple that regularly throw totally out of context remarks into the mix but I would have said that the majority of "thread drift" is just that and hardly wrecking. We have also recently had a poster who was totally outside reasonable bounds (and was thoroughly chewed out for it) but I would have to say, generally I can't agree with your post. (that presuming that I have not missed something)If you were referring to your thread with the (excellent) pictures and the argument over identification, I would have thought that reasonable, especially as they presented evidence to support their belief. Hardly thread wrecking (IMHO It was not done in an aggressive or unreasonable manner) Certainly, it did not impinge on my enjoyment of the photos If you are true to your word John you wont see this, but WTF are you on about when you talk about 'being chewed out for it'? I have suggested an obvious explanation for the 'chewed out' comment. I suggest that you are being obtuse by a/ choosing to ignore it b/ expecting John to reply when you are on his ignore list c/ continuing to seek clarification of a comment that has already been clarified. You may not agree, but I believe it is apparent to all why I suggest you are being obtuse. Rog
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2019 21:47:32 GMT
If you are true to your word John you wont see this, but WTF are you on about when you talk about 'being chewed out for it'? I have suggested an obvious explanation for the 'chewed out' comment. I suggest that you are being obtuse by a/ choosing to ignore it b/ expecting John to reply when you are on his ignore list c/ continuing to seek clarification of a comment that has already been clarified. You may not agree, but I believe it is apparent to all why I suggest you are being obtuse. Rog I regret to inform you your appliccation to be a Thunderboat moderator has been declined.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2019 21:48:22 GMT
Gods teeth!
The idea was to avoid quoting him !!!
|
|