Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2019 14:25:55 GMT
I've read the article, there is no definitive proof in it that he "met the IRA". There is a picture of him with the President of Sinn Fein. Was Corbyn wrong to seek peace and to commemorate all deaths in the conflict. The conflict was put in hold through the discussions with the IRA, it will resume if Boris' Brexiteers have their way, driving a herd of "Irish cows" through the GFA. What's that old political saw, "when in trouble, start a war". I narrowly missed being blown up in one of the Manchester bombs, I'd just driven down Deansgate, was at traffic lights at the far end when it came on the radio, bomb gone off where I'd just been. Sorry Jim I can assure you he was an IRA sympathiser and was across in NI regularly, lots of pictures on the net and the ARMY followed his movements as well, ... Yep - and Iraq had weapons of mass destruction...
|
|
|
Post by thebfg on Oct 6, 2019 15:24:08 GMT
Sorry Jim I can assure you he was an IRA sympathiser and was across in NI regularly, lots of pictures on the net and the ARMY followed his movements as well, ... Yep - and Iraq had weapons of mass destruction... Can you back that up. Because even they did. Were any found?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2019 15:32:33 GMT
Yep - and Iraq had weapons of mass destruction... Can you back that up. Because even they did. Were any found? No I can't - neither can Peter back his claim up without resorting to hyperbole based on his interpretation of events at the time.
|
|
|
Post by thebfg on Oct 6, 2019 16:15:27 GMT
Can you back that up. Because even they did. Were any found? No I can't - neither can Peter back his claim up without resorting to hyperbole based on his interpretation of events at the time. He definitely met with terrorist groups. He met them so much even top police officers were concerned. And have the audacity to deny it is breath taking. It's well known that he supports irish rule in N.I.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2019 16:27:39 GMT
No I can't - neither can Peter back his claim up without resorting to hyperbole based on his interpretation of events at the time. He definitely met with terrorist groups. He met them so much even top police officers were concerned. And have the audacity to deny it is breath taking. It's well known that he supports irish rule in N.I. Meeting terrorist groups (in some circumstances) does not mean you support them.
Supporting Irish rule in NI does not mean you support/sympathise with the IRA/Enemy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2019 16:46:22 GMT
He definitely met with terrorist groups. He met them so much even top police officers were concerned. And have the audacity to deny it is breath taking. It's well known that he supports irish rule in N.I. Meeting terrorist groups (in some circumstances) does not mean you support them.
Supporting Irish rule in NI does not mean you support/sympathise with the IRA/Enemy.
Exactly, how can peacemakers negotiate without meeting those with extreme views. Whether Corbyn IS a peacemaker is debatable.
|
|
|
Post by thebfg on Oct 6, 2019 16:46:38 GMT
He definitely met with terrorist groups. He met them so much even top police officers were concerned. And have the audacity to deny it is breath taking. It's well known that he supports irish rule in N.I. Meeting terrorist groups (in some circumstances) does not mean you support them.
Supporting Irish rule in NI does not mean you support/sympathise with the IRA/Enemy.
I haven't claimed any different. My only point was that he denied meeting them on the BBC. Its common knowledge that he did and he later admitted it. That is called lieing. For Mr Riley to call out someone for lieng when labour leaders have been caught lieing many times is a pointless exercise. Yet Mr Riley will ignore anything said about labour whilst criticising others for the same thing. When he actually comes up with a valid point we will be able to discuss and debate it.
|
|
|
Post by thebfg on Oct 6, 2019 16:47:44 GMT
Meeting terrorist groups (in some circumstances) does not mean you support them.
Supporting Irish rule in NI does not mean you support/sympathise with the IRA/Enemy.
Exactly, how can peacemakers negotiate without meeting those with extreme views. Whether Corbyn IS a peacemaker is debatable. claims of him being a peacemaker were only made once he had been caught out
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2019 16:54:55 GMT
Meeting terrorist groups (in some circumstances) does not mean you support them.
Supporting Irish rule in NI does not mean you support/sympathise with the IRA/Enemy.
I haven't claimed any different. My only point was that he denied meeting them on the BBC. Its common knowledge that he did and he later admitted it. That is called lieing. For Mr Riley to call out someone for lieng when labour leaders have been caught lieing many times is a pointless exercise. Yet Mr Riley will ignore anything said about labour whilst criticising others for the same thing. When he actually comes up with a valid point we will be able to discuss and debate it. Well fecking stick to your point then rather than bringing in whataboutery.
|
|
|
Post by thebfg on Oct 6, 2019 16:56:53 GMT
I haven't claimed any different. My only point was that he denied meeting them on the BBC. Its common knowledge that he did and he later admitted it. That is called lieing. For Mr Riley to call out someone for lieng when labour leaders have been caught lieing many times is a pointless exercise. Yet Mr Riley will ignore anything said about labour whilst criticising others for the same thing. When he actually comes up with a valid point we will be able to discuss and debate it. Well fecking stick to your point then rather than bringing in whataboutery. What, I was bringing substance to my point. If you don't like it, put your phone down.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2019 17:04:46 GMT
Well fecking stick to your point then rather than bringing in whataboutery. What, I was bringing substance to my point. If you don't like it, out your phone down. Last comment from me on this point.
You were giving your view not facts and by bringing in other points trying to bolster/garner support for your view.
That is just my view though...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2019 17:08:29 GMT
It was odd the way jenlyn disappeared.
|
|
|
Post by thebfg on Oct 6, 2019 17:15:12 GMT
What, I was bringing substance to my point. If you don't like it, out your phone down. Last comment from me on this point.
You were giving your view not facts and by bringing in other points trying to bolster/garner support for your view.
That is just my view though...
I need no support thanks.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2019 17:40:25 GMT
It was odd the way jenlyn disappeared. That’s a bit out of the blue. No, not really odd, ‘someone’ is using admin privileges here to mess with peoples posts. It’s a form of moderation which is what I thought this forum was against.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2019 18:03:17 GMT
I was just thinking about it because donkey was one of jenlyn's most popular targets for abuse.
So do we really think that jenlyn has been banned ?
|
|