Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Blacking
Sept 19, 2019 15:04:24 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2019 15:04:24 GMT
The piss takers are the a'merkins for taking out that Libyan geyser.
"Europe will turn black".
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Sept 19, 2019 15:31:09 GMT
|
|
|
Post by brummieboy on Sept 19, 2019 15:32:43 GMT
On an Egyptian Holiday, when one night was 'Egyptian Night' and the boat we were on sold Arab clothes, I didn't need to black up after a seasons boating and the Egyptian sun.
|
|
|
Post by Clinton Cool on Sept 19, 2019 15:40:20 GMT
Sounds like Corbyn on steroids.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Sept 19, 2019 15:49:08 GMT
Sounds like Corbyn on steroids. I am a 'socialist' and I think the best way to 'control' humans is by them having a benevolent dictator to look up to. Most people are thick, so 'Democracy' is just having thick people vote for something. (apart from Brexit, you understand!). Even so, what is 'best'? Should we let Nature and Genes run their course, or try to alter that? And how, when we don't even know what it is! As George Carlin said, the Earth will still go around the Sun when Mankind is gone, only it will be The Earth Plus Plastic.
|
|
|
Post by Clinton Cool on Sept 19, 2019 16:02:45 GMT
Sounds like Corbyn on steroids. I am a 'socialist' and I think the best way to 'control' humans is by them having a benevolent dictator to look up to. Most people are thick, so 'Democracy' is just having thick people vote for something. (apart from Brexit, you understand!). Even so, what is 'best'? Should we let Nature and Genes run their course, or try to alter that? And how, when we don't even know what it is! As George Carlin said, the Earth will still go around the Sun when Mankind is gone, only it will be The Earth Plus Plastic. You're a socialist; guess you support the limp wristed racist in Canada then?
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Sept 19, 2019 16:46:20 GMT
I am a 'socialist' and I think the best way to 'control' humans is by them having a benevolent dictator to look up to. Most people are thick, so 'Democracy' is just having thick people vote for something. (apart from Brexit, you understand!). Even so, what is 'best'? Should we let Nature and Genes run their course, or try to alter that? And how, when we don't even know what it is! As George Carlin said, the Earth will still go around the Sun when Mankind is gone, only it will be The Earth Plus Plastic. You're a socialist; guess you support the limp wristed racist in Canada then? We've been through this many times but once again in a nutshell: I believe everyone should have a decent basic standard of living - shelter, food, medical services, education. Those that want to work harder and study harder deserve more, so up they go. The lazy fuckers just stay where they are. That's the general idea.... but.... is it too soft? Capitalism or 'Real Life' means we go to work because we are scared of losing our status and pay check and will become homeless and hungry with suicide being the only easy way out. I think 'Capitalism' is natural and the way to proceed. Things have been invented out of necessity. Work gets done - or else!! But I think the Capitalist way should be tempered with an amount of kindness, ie. 'Socialism'. I believe students should be free to study without having to acquire a huge debt in the form of a loan so they can go to college. They should have heating and lighting and a certain amount of pocket money and free time, all paid for by 'Society'. Education is the way forward to an enlightened society. It's a difficult thing to balance, but I do not approve of poverty, homeless people sleeping in shop doorways, children going to school with holes in their clothes, etc. What I see in the UK is simply obscene, the wastage and show-boating - look at my BIG house, look at my BIG car! And all of the empty buildings! There are too many rich people, and too many poor people in this world. On the other hand, if the wealth was shared and we were all 'equal' where would that lead us? As with hippies in a 'commune', no-one wants to do the washing-up.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Blacking
Sept 19, 2019 16:52:17 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2019 16:52:17 GMT
Sounds like Corbyn on steroids. Most people are thick, so 'Democracy' is just having thick people vote for something. (apart from Brexit, you understand!). You’d have to be thick to believe that only thick people vote. The fundamental mistake with most (all?) dictatorships is that they assume that they are more intellectual (and worthy) because they have lots of money. That’s why we are being led into a global catastrophe.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Sept 19, 2019 17:01:05 GMT
I am a 'socialist' and I think the best way to 'control' humans is by them having a benevolent dictator to look up to. Most people are thick, so 'Democracy' is just having thick people vote for something. (apart from Brexit, you understand!). Even so, what is 'best'? Should we let Nature and Genes run their course, or try to alter that? And how, when we don't even know what it is! As George Carlin said, the Earth will still go around the Sun when Mankind is gone, only it will be The Earth Plus Plastic. You're a socialist; guess you support the limp wristed racist in Canada then? As for Trudeau: "I always considered Canadians as lost Americans with their brains kicked in ?" "This soft, trendy little snowflake twat, wants to create an “integration fund” with taxpayer money to bring back former Canadians who left to fight for ISIS!!" "Not content with turning Canada into a haven for violent members of the Religion That Must Never Be Criticised, Trudeau has recently tried to curry favour with the misandrist zealots of feminism. In an appearance at a town hall meeting, Trudeau corrected a woman who used the word ‘mankind’ in a question, saying ‘peoplekind’ was more inclusive. Two points: 1/ Isn’t a man, especially a white, cisgender, (allegedly) heterosexual man, correcting a woman an invasion of her safe space? It may even be a hate crime. 2/ Isn’t ‘peoplekind’ the sort of mangled non-word a six year old would come up with? Surely the modern way of replacing ‘mankind’ would be ‘humankind’? Overall Trudeau is a total and utter bellend. His ascent to the prime ministership of Canadia was no doubt eased by being the son(?) of a former PM." "Got a lot on his CV in little over two years since taking office in terms of turning Canada into PC police state that punishes free thought and speech yet appeases militant minorities and extreme Left. Wearing Ramadamadingdong socks to a gay pride march??, praise for Fidel Castro, China’s one party state and dictatorship amongst many limp wristed right-on posturing. I mentioned his twatishness to a Canadian mate and asked how they could elect such a prick but then he pointed out I come from a country which elected Tony Blair three times." "Trudeau is the heap of shit that won’t pay compensation for wounded Canadian troops who’ve lost limbs, but spends millions on apparently re educating Isis fighters."
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Sept 19, 2019 17:02:53 GMT
Most people are thick, so 'Democracy' is just having thick people vote for something. (apart from Brexit, you understand!). You’d have to be thick to believe that only thick people vote. The fundamental mistake with most (all?) dictatorships is that they assume that they are more intellectual (and worthy) because they have lots of money. That’s why we are being led into a global catastrophe. I didn't say that. I said 'most people are thick'. Ergo most votes are not thought through properly and are wasted. Do thick people have a right to vote? It's a moot question.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Sept 19, 2019 17:06:23 GMT
Most people are thick, so 'Democracy' is just having thick people vote for something. (apart from Brexit, you understand!). The fundamental mistake with most (all?) dictatorships is that they assume that they are more intellectual (and worthy) because they have lots of money. Dictatorships should be run by checking how things are with everyone. Of course, that was my theoretical outlook, reality is reality and, so far, most dictators have been twats. However, that also goes for 99% of politicians of all hues and credence.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Blacking
Sept 19, 2019 17:16:00 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2019 17:16:00 GMT
The fundamental mistake with most (all?) dictatorships is that they assume that they are more intellectual (and worthy) because they have lots of money. Dictatorships should be run by checking how things are with everyone. of course, that was my theoretical outlook, reality is reality and, so far, most dictators have been twats. However, that also goes for 99% of politicians of all hues and credence. ...but isn’t the whole point of having a democracy (and a vote) to check how things are with everyone? Once it becomes acceptable to ignore the vote the next step is to remove it. Once that happens everyone’s freedom becomes threatened and you end up one step closer to anarchy. It’s worth doing the research to understand why the U.K. never suffered the same revolution they had in France and Russia.
|
|
|
Post by Clinton Cool on Sept 19, 2019 17:33:05 GMT
Anarchy isn't always a bad thing. I might describe myself as an anarchist, along with being a libertarian and a humanist. The last one surprises some folk, it might seem at odds with the others; humanism is often associated closely with socialism but this is lazy thinking; the two are not linked. I abhor socialism, the cloying state, all powerful in far too many aspects of people's lives, closing down their speech and often harmless actions, destroying the joy that life should be in favour or never ending regulation and conformity.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Sept 19, 2019 17:36:52 GMT
Dictatorships should be run by checking how things are with everyone. of course, that was my theoretical outlook, reality is reality and, so far, most dictators have been twats. However, that also goes for 99% of politicians of all hues and credence. ...but isn’t the whole point of having a democracy (and a vote) to check how things are with everyone? Well, what is best? Democracy is working well in the UK right now, isn't it?
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Sept 19, 2019 17:44:07 GMT
I abhor socialism, the cloying state, all powerful in far too many aspects of people's lives, closing down their speech and often harmless actions, destroying the joy that life should be in favour or never ending regulation and conformity. I'm with you here, but I don't like unnecessary poverty and waste. And as soon as the government steps in to give people affordable council houses and a national health system, then some piss-takers come along to buy those houses for themselves (cheaply) and abuse the hospitals: Nigerian NHS Health Tourist ‘Priscilla’ This woman rocked up to Heathrow three years ago about to calve a sprog. She was treated by OUR NHS and racked up a bill of £500,000. They are still chasing this contemptible bastard; obviously the country will never see a penny. I understand the NHS is chasing £150m in unpaid medical bill run up by foreigners. I’m at some point going to need a hip replacement and I can guarantee I’ll have to wait ages. Simple solution for NHS. Plan A Pay in advance. Don’t want to do that? Plan B Deduct outstanding monies from NHS lackey that signed it off. The last thing we need are more anchor-babies with the inevitable permanent drag on housing, education, medical etc, all at our expense. Here’s an idea. Every one of these twats who turns up to rip off the NHS, of that sum 50% extra is deducted from their country’s aid budget. Cost us a million, we deduct 1.5 million. Should concentrate a few minds. The deductions should NOT go to the NHS as it would encourage stupid lefty activist doctors to carry on despite their actions denying Brits of all stripes, resources supposedly for us.
|
|