Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2019 22:56:36 GMT
Oh dear.....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2019 23:09:18 GMT
Yes but we know it is a setup already.
It's non-profits trying to keep up with the corporations and failing.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Feb 19, 2020 7:54:33 GMT
|
|
|
Post by phil70 on Feb 19, 2020 8:17:42 GMT
NO they haven't gone away more's the pity. They have blockaded roads in Cambridge.....again. even turning away ambulances which were forced to turn round and find another route to Addenbrookes Phil
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Feb 19, 2020 8:19:59 GMT
Why don't the ambulances just run over them?
|
|
|
Post by phil70 on Feb 19, 2020 8:21:11 GMT
Yeah that was my thoughts. Phil
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2020 9:02:37 GMT
|
|
|
Post by JohnV on Feb 19, 2020 9:22:15 GMT
there shouldn't be any pussy footing with them ...... they should all be charged with criminal damage and get jail not just a slap on the wrist
|
|
|
Post by lollygagger on Feb 19, 2020 9:33:53 GMT
No they shouldn't. Wankers they may be, their chosen media grabbing exploits twattish, but the right to protest must not be threatened by judicial heavy handedness.
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Feb 19, 2020 9:43:48 GMT
No they shouldn't. Wankers they may be, their chosen media grabbing exploits twattish, but the right to protest must not be threatened by judicial heavy handedness. A right to protest is fine, I absolutely support it. A right to deliberately damage other people’s property is not fine, it is criminal behaviour. Ditto a right to stop people going about their daily business is not fine, even worse when it puts other people in danger.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2020 9:45:06 GMT
No they shouldn't. Wankersis. they may be, their chosen media grabbing exploits twattish, but the right to protest must not be threatened by judicial heavy handedness. Their right to protest isn't threatened ... their right to do damage is. Rog
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2020 10:51:51 GMT
No they shouldn't. Wankersis. they may be, their chosen media grabbing exploits twattish, but the right to protest must not be threatened by judicial heavy handedness. Their right to protest isn't threatened ... their right to do damage is. Rog I suppose you could turn that around and say the right of those to make lots of money isn't threatened, their right to damage the planet as a result is.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Feb 19, 2020 11:55:18 GMT
Nobody actually has any 'rights' at all. The people with the biggest clubs win every time. Got lots of money to pay your henchmen to protect you from the rabble? You're a winner! The 'Royal' family and the Pope and his gang of red-robed Vatican thugs are all bullies and will dish violence on you if you try to take their money away from them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2020 12:09:40 GMT
Line em up and shoot em. I'll happily do it free of charge.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2020 12:16:14 GMT
Line em up and shoot em. I'll happily do it free of charge. Says it all really.
|
|