|
Post by Delta9 on Oct 25, 2016 16:04:05 GMT
Delta9, Graham's case that he put forward for deleting three threads must have been extraordinarily good surely to justify removing three threads on a forum where there was supposed to be the very lightest of moderator interference? I can't envisage ever being in a position to, or wanting to, remove complete threads that I had participated in. Although I am by no means an idiot when it comes to technical matters I find it interesting to read the counter arguments and make my own mind up from the technical info posted. I grant you that it is easier to do that when you have a technical background but, at the end of the day, the non-technical person could take an opinion and come to a decision from the relative numbers on each side of the argument. Roger It was my fault really, I should've had a clear policy on it from the start. I am now making it clear that threads will not be removed at the request of the poster, so it won't happen again.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2016 16:32:55 GMT
Delta9, Graham's case that he put forward for deleting three threads must have been extraordinarily good surely to justify removing three threads on a forum where there was supposed to be the very lightest of moderator interference? I can't envisage ever being in a position to, or wanting to, remove complete threads that I had participated in. Although I am by no means an idiot when it comes to technical matters I find it interesting to read the counter arguments and make my own mind up from the technical info posted. I grant you that it is easier to do that when you have a technical background but, at the end of the day, the non-technical person could take an opinion and come to a decision from the relative numbers on each side of the argument. Roger It was my fault really, I should've had a clear policy on it from the start. I am now making it clear that threads will not be removed at the request of the poster, so it won't happen again. So the rules as they currently stand are:- Stay within the law. Don't go running to the management if you don't like what's been posted. Don't mention Mickey John. Sounds good to me.
|
|
|
Post by Graham on Oct 25, 2016 16:35:00 GMT
It was my fault really, I should've had a clear policy on it from the start. I am now making it clear that threads will not be removed at the request of the poster, so it won't happen again. It is not one small piece D9's fault, if anyone's it is mine for being so stupid to believe that Nick Norman could changed so that I could write a simple bit of help for someone and he would leave it alone. He never could on CW so why should he here, stupid of me. Sorry but they were causing so much hassle for this place a place that did not have hassle, I could not leave them up he would never have stopped. I won't write anymore
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2016 16:46:06 GMT
It was my fault really, I should've had a clear policy on it from the start. I am now making it clear that threads will not be removed at the request of the poster, so it won't happen again. So the rules as they currently stand are:- Stay within the law. Don't go running to the management if you don't like what's been posted. Don't mention Mickey John. Sounds good to me. Who's Micky John? ...oh bugger!
|
|
|
Post by smileypete on Oct 25, 2016 17:03:38 GMT
Delta9, Graham's case that he put forward for deleting three threads must have been extraordinarily good surely to justify removing three threads on a forum where there was supposed to be the very lightest of moderator interference? I can't envisage ever being in a position to, or wanting to, remove complete threads that I had participated in. Although I am by no means an idiot when it comes to technical matters I find it interesting to read the counter arguments and make my own mind up from the technical info posted. I grant you that it is easier to do that when you have a technical background but, at the end of the day, the non-technical person could take an opinion and come to a decision from the relative numbers on each side of the argument. Roger It was my fault really, I should've had a clear policy on it from the start. I am now making it clear that threads will not be removed at the request of the poster, so it won't happen again. Unless someones making actual legal threats I'd just leave them up, no need to be 'Bag of Bones Mk2' Even CWDF has never removed threads like that, so why should Thunderboat? If someone really is making noises about legal action over some dick waving twattery, please post them here so we can all have a good laugh.
|
|
|
Post by tonyqj on Oct 25, 2016 17:07:12 GMT
It was my fault really, I should've had a clear policy on it from the start. I am now making it clear that threads will not be removed at the request of the poster, so it won't happen again. It is not one small piece D9's fault, if anyone's it is mine for being so stupid to believe that Nick Norman could changed so that I could write a simple bit of help for someone and he would leave it alone. He never could on CW so why should he here, stupid of me. Sorry but they were causing so much hassle for this place a place that did not have hassle, I could not leave them up he would never have stopped. I won't write anymore They weren't causing "so much hassle" at all. Nick corrected something you'd said in one thread. The simple route forward would have been to acknowledge the correction and move on. Rather than do that you wrote lengthy refutations of his point. Nevertheless, by the end of the night it had settled down, Pete had contributed and we'd all moved on. Then you insist that not just that thread but two others must all be deleted. You act like a spoiled 7 year old girl.
|
|
|
Post by tonyqj on Oct 25, 2016 17:11:13 GMT
If someone really is making noises about legal action over some dick waving twattery, please post them here so we can all have a good laugh. I doubt there was any legal basis there. The rules of a Take Down notice don't come close to applying.
|
|
|
Post by Graham on Oct 25, 2016 17:40:51 GMT
It is not one small piece D9's fault, if anyone's it is mine for being so stupid to believe that Nick Norman could changed so that I could write a simple bit of help for someone and he would leave it alone. He never could on CW so why should he here, stupid of me. Sorry but they were causing so much hassle for this place a place that did not have hassle, I could not leave them up he would never have stopped. I won't write anymore They weren't causing "so much hassle" at all. Nick corrected something you'd said in one thread. The simple route forward would have been to acknowledge the correction and move on. Rather than do that you wrote lengthy refutations of his point. Nevertheless, by the end of the night it had settled down, Pete had contributed and we'd all moved on. Then you insist that not just that thread but two others must all be deleted. You act like a spoiled 7 year old girl. Go stuff your head back on CWDF where it belongs. You have not the foggiest, unless it is perfectly technically correct you will attack and criticise just like Norman
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2016 17:55:15 GMT
They weren't causing "so much hassle" at all. Nick corrected something you'd said in one thread. The simple route forward would have been to acknowledge the correction and move on. Rather than do that you wrote lengthy refutations of his point. Nevertheless, by the end of the night it had settled down, Pete had contributed and we'd all moved on. Then you insist that not just that thread but two others must all be deleted. You act like a spoiled 7 year old girl. Go stuff your head back on CWDF where it belongs. You have not the foggiest, unless it is perfectly technically correct you will attack and criticise just like Norman Graham you are a tit.... a big one, should you be in any doubt about the size of the utter tit you are....
|
|
|
Post by tonyqj on Oct 25, 2016 18:03:48 GMT
They weren't causing "so much hassle" at all. Nick corrected something you'd said in one thread. The simple route forward would have been to acknowledge the correction and move on. Rather than do that you wrote lengthy refutations of his point. Nevertheless, by the end of the night it had settled down, Pete had contributed and we'd all moved on. Then you insist that not just that thread but two others must all be deleted. You act like a spoiled 7 year old girl. Go stuff your head back on CWDF where it belongs. You have not the foggiest, unless it is perfectly technically correct you will attack and criticise just like Norman In case nobody's yet called you a twat... you're a twat!
|
|
|
Post by Graham on Oct 25, 2016 18:13:35 GMT
Go stuff your head back on CWDF where it belongs. You have not the foggiest, unless it is perfectly technically correct you will attack and criticise just like Norman In case nobody's yet called you a twat... you're a twat! Your too late better that you have called me a TWAT
|
|
|
Post by Graham on Oct 25, 2016 18:15:55 GMT
Go stuff your head back on CWDF where it belongs. You have not the foggiest, unless it is perfectly technically correct you will attack and criticise just like Norman Graham you are a tit.... a big one, should you be in any doubt about the size of the utter tit you are.... Could not careless - heap it on
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2016 18:21:35 GMT
Graham you are a tit.... a big one, should you be in any doubt about the size of the utter tit you are.... Could not careless - heap it on Stop trying to play us Graham, grow up.
|
|
|
Post by smileypete on Oct 25, 2016 18:26:13 GMT
Graham you are a tit.... a big one, should you be in any doubt about the size of the utter tit you are.... In case nobody's yet called you a twat... you're a twat! C'mon guys, grow up!
|
|
|
Post by Graham on Oct 25, 2016 18:29:09 GMT
Could not careless - heap it on Stop trying to play us Graham, grow up. I grew up years ago now have the benefit of age and know that none of it matters so heap it on if it makes you feel great and better ETA at this rate I might make 600 posts this day
|
|