alan
Junior Member
Posts: 17
|
Post by alan on Oct 26, 2016 11:39:21 GMT
If there are banned members who would like to be considered for re-application to Canal World I am happy to discuss this with the member in question on a case by case basis.
They can contact me, as always, using the email address sitehost@canalworld.net and I will review the reasons for the ban with the other site staff and the forum records and consider the options. Daniel
I imagine there will not be many 'takers'
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2016 11:44:15 GMT
If there are banned members who would like to be considered for re-application to Canal World I am happy to discuss this with the member in question on a case by case basis.
They can contact me, as always, using the email address sitehost@canalworld.net and I will review the reasons for the ban with the other site staff and the forum records and consider the options. Daniel
I imagine there will not be many 'takers'
I thought you were joking at first but no you are correct. www.canalworld.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=88085&p=1907233
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2016 11:46:28 GMT
Needs the money I suspect. Finally realised he may have to pay for his own playground. Patronising prick.
|
|
|
Post by Graham on Oct 26, 2016 11:47:51 GMT
Maybe it should be tried just to prove the point that the banning were incorrect
ETA Oh donations are not reinstated he has to earn those
|
|
|
Post by kris on Oct 26, 2016 11:50:14 GMT
What he's saying is if you come and grovel before the mods and me we might let you back on the board. I think it might be a bit late for that.
|
|
|
Post by Graham on Oct 26, 2016 11:52:04 GMT
If he lets just one back it confirms problems with his systems can't see how he can keep face if he lets anyone back in
|
|
|
Post by kris on Oct 26, 2016 11:53:41 GMT
They won't be letting anyone back in.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Oct 26, 2016 11:59:50 GMT
I would not put myself in a position where those pricks think they have any power over me. Not again, after all the condescending bollocks I had off them. Including wriggle fingers offering to give me english lessons, they can fuck right off.
|
|
|
Post by tonyqj on Oct 26, 2016 12:05:08 GMT
I would not put myself in a position where those pricks think they have any power over me. Not again, after all the condescending bollocks I had off them. Including wriggle fingers offering to give me english lessons, they can fuck right off. No Kris, don't hold back. Tell us what you really think. 😜
|
|
|
Post by kris on Oct 26, 2016 12:09:09 GMT
I would not put myself in a position where those pricks think they have any power over me. Not again, after all the condescending bollocks I had off them. Including wriggle fingers offering to give me english lessons, they can fuck right off. No Kris, don't hold back. Tell us what you really think. 😜 thats the good thing about thunderboat you don't have to hold back.
|
|
|
Post by Graham on Oct 26, 2016 12:12:06 GMT
I would not put myself in a position where those pricks think they have any power over me. Not again, after all the condescending bollocks I had off them. Including wriggle fingers offering to give me english lessons, they can fuck right off. That is what he thinks, that is the freedom here Think I agree with him, his words are better than I would use.
|
|
|
Post by bettina on Oct 26, 2016 12:34:04 GMT
They won't be letting anyone back in. I don't know, IF you all (that's all the 'trouble makers' / 'slimmy stickers' & 'monster' parts) were to reapply, I would lay dollars to doughnuts that 1 or 2 would be accepted. They wouldn't get back to any of you right away, you'd get a generic reply along the lines of.....thank you for your request, I will get back to you with the decision after I've had a chance to discuss it with the rest of the site team Then they'd give it a week - 10 days see who's re-applied and pick out what they feel to be the least worst two...give you loads of extra rules & regs that you would need to agree to, or MODqueue; which you more than likely wouldn't agree. They could then post that they indeed did offer two of you a reinstatement but as you were unwilling to agree with the T&C's they could not see it through. If you were to agree with the T&C's you'd be, as promptly as possible banned again... They then could be seen as the 'ones who in good faith offered the olive branch, only to have their hands bitten', and whenever the next mass cull happens in the future, there would be far fewer members questioning why or protesting for an offer of re-installment. The more I've seen in the past 3 weeks, the more skeptical I've become about cwf. To the point I never take what they or the bunny clique, write at face value, I'm always trying to read between the lines to find the true meaning of what they are writing. Sad really, I didn't used to be so hard in my judgments of people, always tried to see the good and most times gave them the benefit of doubt. Don't get me wrong, I don't mean to profess all Goodness & Mersey, I can be just as sharp as anyone when the mood hits, but I 'try' not to be
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on Oct 26, 2016 12:54:46 GMT
As Hutchinson is in fact a member of 'Thunderboat' ~ he joined on 5 April 2016 and claimed it was done out of 'curiosity' ~ then I suggest to him that if this is a genuine attempt a some sort of reconciliation on his part, then he should be posting a better worded and rather less patronizing offer on this Forum, preceded by an abject apology for his own and his Mod's recent conduct.
|
|
|
Post by Gibbo on Oct 26, 2016 13:47:14 GMT
Oh the irony.
|
|
|
Post by tonyqj on Oct 26, 2016 13:49:33 GMT
|
|