|
Post by Mr Stabby on Sept 15, 2018 11:17:11 GMT
TB is not unmoderated completely - just look at the fuss when certain things which one is not allowed to mention are spoken of. As far as I am aware, the only posts that have been removed or edited by Delta9 are those which have breached court injunctions, specifically by naming people involved in court cases where failing to remove those posts could result in enormous financial penalties for the site administrator, and/or the site being closed down by ProBoards.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Sept 15, 2018 11:26:46 GMT
Yes, I agree with that, and Delta has done an exemplary job. I was just thinking it's daft to keep names such as Fuckuu on the members list. I don't look at the members list very often, encouraged to do so today because, of course, Dyertribe claimed cwb to be a member.
|
|
|
Post by dyertribe on Sept 15, 2018 12:05:20 GMT
Problem is, who is to decide who enhances this forum and who doesnβt? Indeed, there may be an argument that amongst those who contribute frequently there may be individuals who βdo not enhance TB one jotβ.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2018 12:32:02 GMT
I can hear you, you know Rog
|
|
|
Post by JohnV on Sept 15, 2018 16:37:05 GMT
But this is an unmoderated forum, many of us hold CWDF in complete contempt for banning members whose views do not tally with the "owner's", so how would we continue hold the moral high ground if we were to ban members simply because they do not post often enough? I understand that there are several forums (fora?) that remove members from the list if they have not posted for X amount of time .... they are not "banned" and they are perfectly entitled to re-activate or join anew if they so wish. It sounds like a very reasonable way to ensure that a membership list actually reflects the membership rather than the CWDF model where the vast majority of their member list are dead or gone away ...... or maybe even got so pissed off with Denial that they have flounced.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Sept 15, 2018 16:46:46 GMT
But this is an unmoderated forum, many of us hold CWDF in complete contempt for banning members whose views do not tally with the "owner's", so how would we continue hold the moral high ground if we were to ban members simply because they do not post often enough? I understand that there are several forums (fora?) that remove members from the list if they have not posted for X amount of time .... they are not "banned" and they are perfectly entitled to re-activate or join anew if they so wish. It sounds like a very reasonable way to ensure that a membership list actually reflects the membership rather than the CWDF model where the vast majority of their member list are dead or gone away ...... or maybe even got so pissed off with Denial that they have flounced. I think the only way to do this though would be manually, and it would take Delta9 a considerable amount of his time to do this. I'm sure he has better things to do with said time.
|
|
|
Post by JohnV on Sept 15, 2018 16:52:13 GMT
I understand that there are several forums (fora?) that remove members from the list if they have not posted for X amount of time .... they are not "banned" and they are perfectly entitled to re-activate or join anew if they so wish. It sounds like a very reasonable way to ensure that a membership list actually reflects the membership rather than the CWDF model where the vast majority of their member list are dead or gone away ...... or maybe even got so pissed off with Denial that they have flounced. I think the only way to do this though would be manually, and it would take Delta9 a considerable amount of his time to do this. I'm sure he has better things to do with said time. If it had to be done manually then I would agree, it would be quite unfair to try to get D9 to do extra work on the forum
|
|
|
Post by patty on Sept 15, 2018 17:44:32 GMT
Who cares that there are members who don't post?...I don't give a toss..never look at members list..though if there are 'rude' names I can see they should be culled...lets the forum down
|
|
|
Post by patty on Sept 15, 2018 17:45:45 GMT
Who cares that there are members who don't post?...I don't give a toss..never look at members list..though if there are 'rude' names I can see they should be culled...lets the forum down
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Sept 15, 2018 17:50:02 GMT
Well that has upped your post count, didn't know you were competingπ
π
π
.
|
|
|
Post by patty on Sept 15, 2018 17:51:27 GMT
Well that has upped your post count, didn't know you were competingπ
π
π
. no I didn't know I was...
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Sept 15, 2018 18:16:18 GMT
though if there are 'rude' names I can see they should be culled...lets the forum down Thank you, Patty.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2018 18:58:41 GMT
Delta9 is busy driving HGV units around now its winter.
I bet you all believed the Z4 and Jewish woman thing and the house story. Clever shit from the snot gobbler.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Sept 15, 2018 19:03:02 GMT
I'm off to bed, but here are a couple of Saturday evening songs for you:
This one starts at 1:40
|
|
|
Post by Trina on Sept 15, 2018 19:35:43 GMT
Who cares that there are members who don't post?...I don't give a toss..never look at members list..though if there are 'rude' names I can see they should be culled...lets the forum down Totally agree.π
|
|