|
Post by Trina on May 8, 2016 20:06:55 GMT
I know I'm odd ( many have said )but Jeremy looks like a perv to me.I can actually hear him saying,"Would you like a sweetie little girl ?"Aren't you glad I came over from the other side?
|
|
|
Post by sabcat on May 8, 2016 20:30:37 GMT
I know I'm odd ( many have said )but Jeremy looks like a perv to me.I can actually hear him saying,"Would you like a sweetie little girl ?"Aren't you glad I came over from the other side? Sharing your age play fantasies about political figures. What the internet was invented for
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2016 21:30:38 GMT
I know I'm odd ( many have said )but Jeremy looks like a perv to me.I can actually hear him saying,"Would you like a sweetie little girl ?"Aren't you glad I came over from the other side? Were you at Loafers barbecue ?
|
|
|
Post by emma on May 9, 2016 15:22:06 GMT
Well the dust has settled and its now obvious that Labour did crap! After all the political stuff that the Tories have had thrown at them it should have been a whitewash! but no Labour lost councilors and Scotland, they are really in the do dah to say the least. My daughter won her seat, but UKIP still gained an extra 2 seats, and at least six of the labour councilors are involved in the child sex scandal. But as someone said stick a red rose on a donkey in Rotherham and they will vote for it!! Whats your views guys Yeah right, talk crap why don't you. I even guess you believe it. Good job no-one else does.
|
|
|
Post by peterboat on May 9, 2016 20:41:58 GMT
Or the real figures 1326 councilors -18 for labour 842 " " -48 for tories 378 " " +45 for Lib Dems 58 " " +25 for UKIP -1 council for tories +1 " " for Lib Dems
Given the problems the tories have had they should have been slaughtered but they wernt Labour lost 18 councilors which should never have happened. So I stand by the post Labour did shit Alenfour or whoever you are
|
|
|
Post by sabcat on May 10, 2016 8:05:51 GMT
Sorry Peter, just because you want something to be true, doesn't make it so. To make sense of these number an actual analysis is required and your post isn't it.
What "should" have happened is a bizarre place to start, there is no "should". What we had in this election is Labour defending gains in these seats from 2012 (the last time they were fought) and of the 800 gains in 2012 - the seats that are going to change hands, the seats that aren't "safe" - Labour held all but 18 of them (or close enough as to not worry) and took the London mayoral elections. Could they have taken more? Probably but there's no "should". Or if there is there's the "expert" predictions, the pollsters, the commentators and the academics who ahead of the vote predicted Labour losing 150 - 300 sets (depending on which one you preferred).
Your "should" is just something you pulled out of your ass post event to fit your narrative. It's meaningless.
|
|
|
Post by peterboat on May 10, 2016 9:31:40 GMT
Its not a case of I want it to be true at all Given the hassle the Tories are having backlashes are the norm clearly in this case it aint happened. My daughter is now a Labour Councillor they expected to make gains but lost 2 seats. I think something different happened this election, and the GE before it, we are in uncharted waters when accurate predictions just arnt happening.
|
|
|
Post by emma on May 13, 2016 13:44:10 GMT
Or the real figures 1326 councilors -18 for labour 842 " " -48 for tories 378 " " +45 for Lib Dems 58 " " +25 for UKIP -1 council for tories +1 " " for Lib Dems Given the problems the tories have had they should have been slaughtered but they wernt Labour lost 18 councilors which should never have happened. So I stand by the post Labour did shit Alenfour or whoever you are None so blind as those who cannot see. You quote figures and then ignore them, how unbelievably stupid thing can you be? Try again, ask your mother to help you count (maybe she'll help you spell too). Look at your figures. 1326 Labour councillors against 842 Tories, shit? That's nearly 50% more seats. You have evinced support for UKIP before, where are they? 58? Pass the magnifying glass.
|
|
|
Post by peterboat on May 13, 2016 13:57:55 GMT
Or the real figures 1326 councilors -18 for labour 842 " " -48 for tories 378 " " +45 for Lib Dems 58 " " +25 for UKIP -1 council for tories +1 " " for Lib Dems Given the problems the tories have had they should have been slaughtered but they wernt Labour lost 18 councilors which should never have happened. So I stand by the post Labour did shit Alenfour or whoever you are None so blind as those who cannot see. You quote figures and then ignore them, how unbelievably stupid thing can you be? Try again, ask your mother to help you count (maybe she'll help you spell too). Look at your figures. 1326 Labour councillors against 842 Tories, shit? That's nearly 50% more seats. You have evinced support for UKIP before, where are they? 58? Pass the magnifying glass. Well alenafour on any other occasion in between GEs the the opposing side normally gains not loses as in this case so didnt they do crap whitewash in scotland etc etc
|
|
|
Post by bills on May 13, 2016 14:15:52 GMT
It's nice to see that Chris has popped in briefly to spew some bile again.
|
|
|
Post by peterboat on May 13, 2016 14:17:39 GMT
It's nice to see that Chris has popped in briefly to spew some bile again. Yes or is Dave clinton or one of his other personas
|
|