|
Post by kris on May 14, 2016 15:34:03 GMT
as in the title really do people think that crt have the right to tell you to return to your mooring?
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on May 14, 2016 15:38:36 GMT
In a word, no. They can warn you about overstaying, but they can't tell you where to go other than "somewhere else".
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2016 15:44:10 GMT
Who cares,move every 14 days like the rest of us.
|
|
|
Post by Saltysplash on May 14, 2016 15:45:57 GMT
Well, yes they can tell you, but they cant make you. I read the above more as a request rather than a demand with the use of the word please.
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 14, 2016 16:04:57 GMT
Who cares,move every 14 days like the rest of us. Go and get back under your bridge.
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 14, 2016 16:07:12 GMT
Yes he did say please, that's because the EO who issued it is a really nice guy, he was gutted he had to do it. I'm just interested if they can dictate your direction of travel.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2016 18:15:43 GMT
Yes he did say please, that's because the EO who issued it is a really nice guy, he was gutted he had to do it. I'm just interested if they can dictate your direction of travel. Cant dictate his direction of travel if he has a mooring
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2016 19:58:10 GMT
One fatal mistake, given the boat has a home mooring. It says "waterway". I cannot see a judge entertaining this, given the clear and concise wording of the 95 act regarding boats with a home mooring. If it said "place", a judge would possibly hear it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2016 20:02:30 GMT
People need to be worried about this sort of behaviour from Crt. I have always felt, and put forward the fact, that an older couple might just enjoy pottering up and down the waterway near their home mooring. The legislation allows for this, but CRT are attempting to stop it. Fuckin ridiculous.
|
|
|
Post by tadworth on May 14, 2016 20:19:36 GMT
Maybe the EO knows the person, and their mooring is nearby, or they said they were going there. Not enough information here. No EO can tell anyone where to moor.
I would worry more about the first tick box in the second section on that patrol notice if I were you.
|
|
|
Post by zigspider on May 14, 2016 21:18:47 GMT
My only issue would be a tad pedantic. It asked the EO to print his name, but he didn't. To me, print indicates capitals.Here, his print is a more of a clearer signature ( which is still not that legible ) Is it a 48H mooring ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2016 21:19:18 GMT
People need to be worried about this sort of behaviour from Crt. I have always felt, and put forward the fact, that an older couple might just enjoy pottering up and down the waterway near their home mooring. The legislation allows for this, but CRT are attempting to stop it. Fuckin ridiculous. It is ridiculous and it calls into question the value of having a home mooring if your being treated the same as a CC.I think we both touched on this a few days back when I said that the usual suspects on CWDF had been very quiet about this erosion of their conditions preferring to attack that old favourite the continuous moorer
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 15, 2016 5:33:53 GMT
I'm not too worried baring any un for seen snags, I should be able to start moving again later this week. I got my new engine started yesterday. So just a few things like throttle linkage to get sorted. I just find it interesting that Crt feel able to tell me which direction to navigate. It's just an example of how they want to micro manage everything. As I understand it legally I could move to another place, then after 14days move back to this place if I wanted. There being no legal requirement for me to keep moving in one direction.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 15, 2016 5:59:46 GMT
I'm not too worried baring any un for seen snags, I should be able to start moving again later this week. I got my new engine started yesterday. So just a few things like throttle linkage to get sorted. I just find it interesting that Crt feel able to tell me which direction to navigate. It's just an example of how they want to micro manage everything. As I understand it legally I could move to another place, then after 14days move back to this place if I wanted. There being no legal requirement for me to keep moving in one direction. If you have overstayed then CRT have issued you a notice,where is the micromanagement in that ? did you inform them that you would be overstaying ? If Medlock is your boat and you say the EO is a nice guy didn't you ask him why he had added "you have to return to your mooring please" If you have a mooring,I think CRT being obviously aware of this fact have just written this down with no malice whatsoever,if you were a continuous cruiser it would say "continue with your cruise please".Everyone here knows the Legal Position and of course you could do as you suggest,which begs the next question, why don't you ? I disagree completely that this is micromanagement of any sort,he can't ask you to continue with your cruise as you aren't a continuous cruiser so instead has asked you to take the boat back to its mooring.You seem to have drip fed us the facts,why didn't you ask for an authorised overstay ? Our friend Tadworth to his credit was the first to pick up on the lack of information provided,I suppose like me he will be surprised to learn that Medlock is your craft. I wonder if you have posted this on the other channel,I can well imagine the reception you would get there,still with your study of "The art of war"you may consider that you would be well prepared ? I doubt it.
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 15, 2016 7:35:04 GMT
Oh well I suppose you can't have an Internet forum without a troll, cds you have become Thundeboat's resident troll. So just tootle off back under your bridge like a good little troll, this is all the food you will be getting from me.
|
|