|
|
Post by Andyberg on Oct 21, 2017 8:36:26 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by cygnus on Oct 21, 2017 8:41:42 GMT
Absolute Scum
|
|
|
|
Post by kris on Oct 21, 2017 8:45:53 GMT
He's a politician, what do you expect? |
|
|
|
Post by Andyberg on Oct 21, 2017 8:49:06 GMT
You have to seriously question the ethics of someone who's willing to take much more money than he is due (alleged redundancy payment and written off loans) from an organisation that's set up to look after its members employment rights, I wonder if when his members were made redundant they received more than the government minimum?
|
|
|
|
Post by bodger on Oct 21, 2017 10:22:26 GMT
I look forward to hearing JC defending him, or not.
as a dyed-in-the-wool Tory I admit to having a grudging respect for Corbyn - he seems decent and honest.
how he handles this will confirm (or destroy) my opinion of him.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2017 11:02:15 GMT
These allegations which go back eighteen months have resulted in two enquiries. The first, by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, reported over six months ago. The second, by the Certification Officer, which regulates trade unions, was published this week.
Both cleared Ian Lavery of any wrong doing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Oct 21, 2017 11:22:41 GMT
These allegations which go back eighteen months have resulted in two enquiries. The first, by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, reported over six months ago. The second, by the Certification Officer, which regulates trade unions, was published this week. Both cleared Ian Lavery of any wrong doing. He may not have broken any rules, but is what he did right? Is it the sort of behaviour we want from our leaders? |
|
|
|
Post by patty on Oct 21, 2017 12:57:49 GMT
They are all in it to feather their own nest with ££'s..
|
|
|
|
Post by Andyberg on Oct 21, 2017 13:02:21 GMT
These allegations which go back eighteen months have resulted in two enquiries. The first, by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, reported over six months ago. The second, by the Certification Officer, which regulates trade unions, was published this week. Both cleared Ian Lavery of any wrong doing. Cleared of wrong doing or not, I refer you back to my earlier comment..... 'You have to seriously question the ethics of someone who's willing to take much more money than he is due (alleged redundancy payment and written off loans) from an organisation that's set up to look after its members employment rights' |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2017 14:17:46 GMT
These allegations which go back eighteen months have resulted in two enquiries. The first, by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, reported over six months ago. The second, by the Certification Officer, which regulates trade unions, was published this week. Both cleared Ian Lavery of any wrong doing. Cleared of wrong doing or not, I refer you back to my earlier comment..... 'You have to seriously question the ethics of someone who's willing to take much more money than he is due (alleged redundancy payment and written off loans) from an organisation that's set up to look after its members employment rights' Well perhaps the BBC ought to be questioning the union and it's members instead of making this lazy personal attack. Union payments are only made through a democratic process. I'd prefer not to rush to judgement if rules haven't been broken. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2017 16:07:49 GMT
Never mind all that Andy, have you managed to get your hands on an AC Invacar?
|
|
