|
Post by kris on Apr 4, 2016 17:10:30 GMT
Yes I would say so because that is what they originally registered as, they changed it. I don't believe it's him though. I'm jenlyn from cwdf. I thought we'd sorted that out yesterday Regards kris
|
|
|
Post by john_holden on Apr 4, 2016 17:36:26 GMT
Yes I would say so because that is what they originally registered as, they changed it. I don't believe it's him though. I'm jenlyn from cwdf. Apologies then Jenlyn. You must realise then that nutter is passing himself off as you!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2016 17:39:51 GMT
Apologies then Jenlyn. You must realise then that nutter is passing himself off as you! Yes he does, he posted about having a doppleganger yesterday.
|
|
|
Post by john_holden on Apr 4, 2016 17:44:24 GMT
Apologies then Jenlyn. You must realise then that nutter is passing himself off as you! Yes he does, he posted about having a doppleganger yesterday. Must have been before I joined. Delta must be aware then?
|
|
|
Post by kris on Apr 4, 2016 17:44:35 GMT
[[Apologies then Jenlyn. You must realise then that nutter is passing himself off as you! ]
More alarming, he's trying to pass himself off as a Humanbeing.
Regards kris
|
|
|
Post by Delta9 on Apr 4, 2016 18:06:06 GMT
Yes he does, he posted about having a doppleganger yesterday. Must have been before I joined. Delta must be aware then? I am aware. If imitation posters cause any problems I can verify which is the real profile, but I'm just leaving them to it for now.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2016 18:06:13 GMT
Yes he does, he posted about having a doppleganger yesterday. Must have been before I joined. Delta must be aware then? Correct he is. cross post with delta.
|
|
|
Post by PaulG2 on Apr 10, 2016 14:38:58 GMT
Personally, I think that the crude joke and personal attacks against Dan are disgusting and childish. I can understand Delta9 not wanting to remove the offending posts as a matter of principle, but that doesn't mean people can't tell the poster what an idiot s/he is.
|
|
|
Post by PaulG2 on Apr 11, 2016 16:30:24 GMT
Talking shit about Daniel is really low, and says considerably more about the person writing the comment than it does about Dan. I certainly don't agree with Dan's most recent choice of moderators, but he has to live and learn just like everyone else and the fact that he has made a couple bad choices shouldn't subject him to Nutter's kind of "jokes".
This forum will rise or fall on its own merit, not on how much criticism is heaped on CWDF by people posting here.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2016 16:47:09 GMT
I was among the first to object to Nutter but I feel its been done to death now. Some people on here are longtime contributors to CWDF and its only natural that they feel upset and disappointed and want to pass some initial comment which they have done,talking shit and posting as nutter did however are two different things. I personally am anxious to forget CWDF and grow this platform so I have only agreement for your last sentence.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2016 16:52:04 GMT
Talking shit about Daniel is really low, and says considerably more about the person writing the comment than it does about Dan. I certainly don't agree with Dan's most recent choice of moderators, but he has to live and learn just like everyone else and the fact that he has made a couple bad choices shouldn't subject him to Nutter's kind of "jokes". This forum will rise or fall on its own merit, not on how much criticism is heaped on CWDF by people posting here. Sorry but that's simply crap. But thanks for showing your true colors...sorry meant colours. BTW, I have some nice friends on the other side of the lake...
|
|
|
Post by PaulG2 on Apr 11, 2016 20:39:59 GMT
Talking shit about Daniel is really low, and says considerably more about the person writing the comment than it does about Dan. I certainly don't agree with Dan's most recent choice of moderators, but he has to live and learn just like everyone else and the fact that he has made a couple bad choices shouldn't subject him to Nutter's kind of "jokes". This forum will rise or fall on its own merit, not on how much criticism is heaped on CWDF by people posting here. Sorry but that's simply crap. But thanks for showing your true colors...sorry meant colours. BTW, I have some nice friends on the other side of the lake... Slinging BS is easy enough, but it's meaningless. If you have a problem with what I said, spell it out instead of spouting meaningless platitudes like an ignorant xenophobe.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2016 20:47:52 GMT
Sorry but that's simply crap. But thanks for showing your true colors...sorry meant colours. BTW, I have some nice friends on the other side of the lake... Slinging BS is easy enough, but it's meaningless. If you have a problem with what I said, spell it out instead of spouting meaningless platitudes like an ignorant xenophobe. Simple. Daniel is in charge so it's his fault if things go tits up. Sorry about the xenophobia BTW. Just a bad time....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2016 21:04:53 GMT
Sorry but that's simply crap. But thanks for showing your true colors...sorry meant colours. BTW, I have some nice friends on the other side of the lake... Slinging BS is easy enough, but it's meaningless. If you have a problem with what I said, spell it out instead of spouting meaningless platitudes like an ignorant xenophobe. Just remembered why your post annoyed me now. Nobody here as far as I have noticed is talking shit about Daniel. That's something I think you made up.
|
|
|
Post by PaulG2 on Apr 12, 2016 13:47:53 GMT
Slinging BS is easy enough, but it's meaningless. If you have a problem with what I said, spell it out instead of spouting meaningless platitudes like an ignorant xenophobe. Just remembered why your post annoyed me now. Nobody here as far as I have noticed is talking shit about Daniel. That's something I think you made up. What a strange interpretation of what I wrote, from my perspective anyway. Something must have got lost in translation. For the record, I too have (politely) criticized Dan's recent decisions, but I've criticized his decisions, not Dan personally. (I have gotten personal about LC and WF, so I'm not claiming perfection in this regard. But those two are self-righteous bimbos, so that makes it okay, doesn't it?) Other than the chicken remark, I can't recall any other such comments about Dan personally on here. My criticism of the chicken remark was directed only at Nutter, no one else.
|
|