Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2016 18:00:01 GMT
I notice that the Tadworh case has been hijacked by Narrowboatworld today,what a strange site that is.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2016 5:35:16 GMT
Some of those that remain, have been set in their ways, and just cannot adjust to the trusts "private enterprise". The only way forward in my view, is for parry to get rid of the old stock, bring in some new blood that has the sense to work with the people it has responsibility for. I don't see Parry as any kind of innocent victim of the aggressive and ill-intentioned knuckle draggers from the upper echelons of C&RT's Enforcement and Legal departments. My own dealings with him, since becoming CEO, have left me convinced that he's a thoroughly nasty piece of work, . . . devious, evasive, dishonest, and above all, very definitely NOT up to the job he's been given. He is, as you say, a PR man through and through, and I believe that he's given a lot of active encouragement for the excesses of the Enforcement gang from the time of his appointment. The first time I met Parry and heard him speak was at a Public Meeting in Milton Keynes where I sat behind Jenlyn. I came away with the impression he was a snide mealy mouthed careerist who probably sees CRT as his best vehicle to a possible knighthood.I well remember the IWA alongside Wyvern Shipping sat on the opposite side of the room, I wonder how they view him ? probably quite well I imagine.
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on Jun 4, 2016 8:16:44 GMT
I don't see Parry as any kind of innocent victim of the aggressive and ill-intentioned knuckle draggers from the upper echelons of C&RT's Enforcement and Legal departments. My own dealings with him, since becoming CEO, have left me convinced that he's a thoroughly nasty piece of work, . . . devious, evasive, dishonest, and above all, very definitely NOT up to the job he's been given. He is, as you say, a PR man through and through, and I believe that he's given a lot of active encouragement for the excesses of the Enforcement gang from the time of his appointment. The first time I met Parry and heard him speak was at a Public Meeting in Milton Keynes where I sat behind Jenlyn. I came away with the impression he was a snide mealy mouthed careerist who probably sees CRT as his best vehicle to a possible knighthood. I would say that he is very deserving of being knighted, . . . provided of course that it is done by means of a sword across the back the neck, rather than the more usual method across the shoulder.
|
|
|
Post by tadworth on Jun 4, 2016 13:11:41 GMT
Sometimes Tony I get the slight hint in your posts that you don't like CRT ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2016 13:26:18 GMT
I don't wish to scare anyone, but the resemblance between flincher (above) and Tony's avatar is uncanny!
|
|
|
Post by PaulG2 on Jun 4, 2016 13:47:09 GMT
Sometimes Tony I get the slight hint in your posts that you don't like CRT ? The following is offered as friendly advice. Take it for what it's worth. I can't speak for Tony, but I've never seen him to be anti-CRT. I think you need to distinguish between not liking or not supporting an organization, and being thoroughly disgusted with that organization's management. If you intend to carry on with your crusade against CRT, you really should learn to always differentiate between those two positions. In the first instance, if you are anti-CRT, then you are either an anarchist who wants no governance of the canals, or you are someone who has not come to grips with the fact that if you replaced CRT, you would simply replace it with another CRT. It's not CRT that are inherently bad, it's the management of CRT that has gone astray. In fact, you should become CRT's biggest cheerleader, albeit with caveats that you cheer for CRT as it was meant to be, not as current management would have it be. See the difference?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2016 13:56:51 GMT
Sometimes Tony I get the slight hint in your posts that you don't like CRT ? The following is offered as friendly advice. Take it for what it's worth. I can't speak for Tony, but I've never seen him to be anti-CRT. I think you need to distinguish between not liking or not supporting an organization, and being thoroughly disgusted with that organization's management. If you intend to carry on with your crusade against CRT, you really should learn to always differentiate between those two positions. In the first instance, if you are anti-CRT, then you are either an anarchist who wants no governance of the canals, or you are someone who has not come to grips with the fact that if you replaced CRT, you would simply replace it with another CRT. It's not CRT that are inherently bad, it's the management of CRT that has gone astray. In fact, you should become CRT's biggest cheerleader, albeit with caveats that you cheer for CRT as it was meant to be, not as current management would have it be. See the difference? I think tadworth is just using "Crt" in his posts as a manner of speech, and I think your attempting to make a mountain of a molehill.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Jun 4, 2016 14:05:14 GMT
So THAT'S Alan Fincher. Interesting to see. I've not met him so, as usual, am neutral. Yep, Avatar to a fault! Uncanny indeed! It's funny how 'the Mind's Eye' produces images so different from reality.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Jun 4, 2016 14:50:35 GMT
Sometimes Tony I get the slight hint in your posts that you don't like CRT ? The following is offered as friendly advice. Take it for what it's worth. I can't speak for Tony, but I've never seen him to be anti-CRT. I think you need to distinguish between not liking or not supporting an organization, and being thoroughly disgusted with that organization's management. If you intend to carry on with your crusade against CRT, you really should learn to always differentiate between those two positions. In the first instance, if you are anti-CRT, then you are either an anarchist who wants no governance of the canals, or you are someone who has not come to grips with the fact that if you replaced CRT, you would simply replace it with another CRT. It's not CRT that are inherently bad, it's the management of CRT that has gone astray. In fact, you should become CRT's biggest cheerleader, albeit with caveats that you cheer for CRT as it was meant to be, not as current management would have it be. See the difference? I don't see what Tadworth is doing as a crusade against Crt. He is someone one who has been wronged against by an organisation, who is fighting back defending what is his. In doing so he is defending the rights of all boaters weither they understand or appreciate this or not. Crt's action of threatening section 8 all the time is pushing people into corners. What they are beginning to realise is when faced with this situation, not everybody rolls over.
|
|
|
Post by tadworth on Jun 4, 2016 15:18:08 GMT
Sometimes Tony I get the slight hint in your posts that you don't like CRT ? The following is offered as friendly advice. Take it for what it's worth. I can't speak for Tony, but I've never seen him to be anti-CRT. I think you need to distinguish between not liking or not supporting an organization, and being thoroughly disgusted with that organization's management. If you intend to carry on with your crusade against CRT, you really should learn to always differentiate between those two positions. In the first instance, if you are anti-CRT, then you are either an anarchist who wants no governance of the canals, or you are someone who has not come to grips with the fact that if you replaced CRT, you would simply replace it with another CRT. It's not CRT that are inherently bad, it's the management of CRT that has gone astray. In fact, you should become CRT's biggest cheerleader, albeit with caveats that you cheer for CRT as it was meant to be, not as current management would have it be. See the difference? It was a joke. I have spoken to Tony a few times, and he would no hesitate to use nuclear weapons on CRT headquarters.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2016 15:31:12 GMT
The following is offered as friendly advice. Take it for what it's worth. I can't speak for Tony, but I've never seen him to be anti-CRT. I think you need to distinguish between not liking or not supporting an organization, and being thoroughly disgusted with that organization's management. If you intend to carry on with your crusade against CRT, you really should learn to always differentiate between those two positions. In the first instance, if you are anti-CRT, then you are either an anarchist who wants no governance of the canals, or you are someone who has not come to grips with the fact that if you replaced CRT, you would simply replace it with another CRT. It's not CRT that are inherently bad, it's the management of CRT that has gone astray. In fact, you should become CRT's biggest cheerleader, albeit with caveats that you cheer for CRT as it was meant to be, not as current management would have it be. See the difference? It was a joke. I have spoken to Tony a few times, and he would no hesitate to use nuclear weapons on CRT headquarters. You don't need me to tell you but I shall anyway,tread carefully with CRT because they are a malicious bunch, what you have here is a capitulation by the Governing Body and they won't like that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2016 15:32:21 GMT
So THAT'S Alan Fincher. Interesting to see. I've not met him so, as usual, am neutral. Yep, Avatar to a fault! Uncanny indeed! It's funny how 'the Mind's Eye' produces images so different from reality. I hope that theory holds true when I meet you.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Jun 4, 2016 15:37:42 GMT
That's a big 'if' - haha!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2016 15:46:50 GMT
I don't wish to scare anyone, but the resemblance between flincher (above) and Tony's avatar is uncanny! I don't think there is a member of CWDF that has been such a disappointment to me than Fincher.I have known him indirectly for years through him mooring on the offside at Fenny Stratford for a number of years. There is a saying that you never learn about anyone till something goes wrong and I remembered this when Fincher had his Boat Hanging Incident.From locking threads on Forums to his attempts to "not rock the boat" with CRT I found his conduct pretty shabby throughout,I think it was compounded by the fact I believed him to be a genuine bloke. His condescending tone on the Tadworth thread the other day,in his attempts to "guess the posters identity" in order to denigrate the posts is yet another example.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Jun 4, 2016 15:52:43 GMT
The following is offered as friendly advice. Take it for what it's worth. I can't speak for Tony, but I've never seen him to be anti-CRT. I think you need to distinguish between not liking or not supporting an organization, and being thoroughly disgusted with that organization's management. If you intend to carry on with your crusade against CRT, you really should learn to always differentiate between those two positions. In the first instance, if you are anti-CRT, then you are either an anarchist who wants no governance of the canals, or you are someone who has not come to grips with the fact that if you replaced CRT, you would simply replace it with another CRT. It's not CRT that are inherently bad, it's the management of CRT that has gone astray. In fact, you should become CRT's biggest cheerleader, albeit with caveats that you cheer for CRT as it was meant to be, not as current management would have it be. See the difference? It was a joke. I have spoken to Tony a few times, and he would no hesitate to use nuclear weapons on CRT headquarters. I'd have no problem nuking crt's managment, they are ruining what was a really relaxed peaceful way of life.
|
|