|
Post by Bad-Bitch on Jul 29, 2016 0:45:43 GMT
you mean apart from MtB jumping up and down going "Me Sir, Me Sir, slurp, what about Me Sir" It's a strange one, a few years ago I would taken up the challenge and put myself forward but nowadays I would worry about what was expected and I suspect the site owner gives very little autonomy to the moderating team. when I have modded before decisions used to get tossed around between a few mods or sometimes only a couple but essentially the decision was theirs, the site owner rarely got involved in day to day moderating decisions, he trusted the team he had 'appointed' to get on with it and didn't interfere. i suspect on CWDF the mods are under the cosh a bit and dare not fart without the site owners permission 'micro management' we used to call it at work. I personally couldnt operate in that sort of atmosphere. That is why your site rules if you have them have to be clear and on CWDF at the moment they are not. GG's take on the above would be interesting. interesting one yes, i had many a run in with dan over decisions i had made and carried out, having to explain my actions and being spoken to like a naughty child, i even got a bollocking for changeing someones name because their OH was stalking them after i was asked to delete the only post they had made, when he took on paul the mods had priviliges taken off them because some things that we could do were seen as admins job only.
|
|
|
Post by haulierp on Jul 29, 2016 5:13:19 GMT
It's a strange one, a few years ago I would taken up the challenge and put myself forward but nowadays I would worry about what was expected and I suspect the site owner gives very little autonomy to the moderating team. when I have modded before decisions used to get tossed around between a few mods or sometimes only a couple but essentially the decision was theirs, the site owner rarely got involved in day to day moderating decisions, he trusted the team he had 'appointed' to get on with it and didn't interfere. i suspect on CWDF the mods are under the cosh a bit and dare not fart without the site owners permission 'micro management' we used to call it at work. I personally couldnt operate in that sort of atmosphere. That is why your site rules if you have them have to be clear and on CWDF at the moment they are not. GG's take on the above would be interesting. interesting one yes, i had many a run in with dan over decisions i had made and carried out, having to explain my actions and being spoken to like a naughty child, i even got a bollocking for changeing someones name because their OH was stalking them after i was asked to delete the only post they had made, when he took on paul the mods had priviliges taken off them because some things that we could do were seen as admins job only. I disagree with Martins suggestion that Moderators are under the cosh,people with any intelligence or backbone simply walk as you have done. Its only the mealy mouthed "look at me,I have a role to play" unfulfilled failures that would allow themselves to be treated in that way.I hate these subservient types,they are fit only for a gallon of Petrol and a match in my opinion.It draws strange parallels with a Womans Refuge in my way of thinking,I feel sure not one of those Moderators could provide as much as a Good Night in Bed for man,woman or beast.The absolute arse end of humanity,simply loathsome.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2016 6:04:34 GMT
interesting one yes, i had many a run in with dan over decisions i had made and carried out, having to explain my actions and being spoken to like a naughty child, i even got a bollocking for changeing someones name because their OH was stalking them after i was asked to delete the only post they had made, when he took on paul the mods had priviliges taken off them because some things that we could do were seen as admins job only. I disagree with Martins suggestion that Moderators are under the cosh,people with any intelligence or backbone simply walk as you have done. Its only the mealy mouthed "look at me,I have a role to play" unfulfilled failures that would allow themselves to be treated in that way.I hate these subservient types,they are fit only for a gallon of Petrol and a match in my opinion.It draws strange parallels with a Womans Refuge in my way of thinking,I feel sure not one of those Moderators could provide as much as a Good Night in Bed for man,woman or beast.The absolute arse end of humanity,simply loathsome. cDS you just disagree for the sake of it because you clearly don't fully understand a point being made. The point I made is clearly valid as demonstrated by GG who has described it exactly as I expected, she has been there, you haven't. The fact that some have broken free from it is not the main, point, I was talking about the time whilst actually serving. As I said in another thread the more I read your posts the more I realise Kris is correct.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Jul 29, 2016 6:33:04 GMT
Martin please stop bringing me into your dispute with fuckwit. Your quite capable of looking after yourself without trying to drag me into it.
|
|
|
Post by haulierp on Jul 29, 2016 7:12:29 GMT
I disagree with Martins suggestion that Moderators are under the cosh,people with any intelligence or backbone simply walk as you have done. Its only the mealy mouthed "look at me,I have a role to play" unfulfilled failures that would allow themselves to be treated in that way.I hate these subservient types,they are fit only for a gallon of Petrol and a match in my opinion.It draws strange parallels with a Womans Refuge in my way of thinking,I feel sure not one of those Moderators could provide as much as a Good Night in Bed for man,woman or beast.The absolute arse end of humanity,simply loathsome. cDS you just disagree for the sake of it because you clearly don't fully understand a point being made. The point I made is clearly valid as demonstrated by GG who has described it exactly as I expected, she has been there, you haven't. The fact that some have broken free from it is not the main, point, I was talking about the time whilst actually serving. As I said in another thread the more I read your posts the more I realise Kris is correct. What a load of bollocks you talk Martin,in your post which is an old one to be fair you clearly state that you feel Moderators are under the cosh, you would say that as clearly you have a foot in both camps which is your prerogative.I disagree with that conclusion and say so not only that, I explain why I disagree.I don't question the validity of anything else you say and I am not interested in peoples moderating experiences only passing a judgement as regards how I and others have been treated by the Cretins across the road.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2016 7:16:23 GMT
cDS you just disagree for the sake of it because you clearly don't fully understand a point being made. The point I made is clearly valid as demonstrated by GG who has described it exactly as I expected, she has been there, you haven't. The fact that some have broken free from it is not the main, point, I was talking about the time whilst actually serving. As I said in another thread the more I read your posts the more I realise Kris is correct. What a load of bollocks you talk Martin,in your post which is an old one to be fair you clearly state that you feel Moderators are under the cosh, you would say that as clearly you have a foot in both camps which is your prerogative.I disagree with that conclusion and say so not only that, I explain why I disagree.I don't question the validity of anything else you say and I am not interested in peoples moderating experiences only passing a judgement as regards how I and others have been treated by the Cretins across the road. CDS - you would argue black was white, you are indeed an argumentative prick.
|
|
|
Post by haulierp on Jul 29, 2016 7:22:51 GMT
Martin please stop bringing me into your dispute with fuckwit. Your quite capable of looking after yourself without trying to drag me into it. If you abuse me one more time the agreement between us is over.I have been careful not to personally attack you and here I find you abusing me again.Martin has said from the outset that he is on this Forum for the wind up and he clearly feels that we can provide him with some entertainment.I have no wish to entertain Martin or denigrate the forum for other posters I hope you feel the same way.Please don't feel the need to reply,I am not attempting to get one up on you but merely stating a fact.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Jul 29, 2016 7:28:01 GMT
No your threatening me and telling me what to do. You have made derogatory remarks about myself since our "agreement" I have chosen to ignore them for the sake of other forum members.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Jul 29, 2016 7:30:29 GMT
I find the fact that some people post more than twenty posts a day and feel it is there job to start debate by prodding other forum members farcical.
|
|
|
Post by haulierp on Jul 29, 2016 7:35:50 GMT
No your threatening me and telling me what to do. You have made derogatory remarks about myself since our "agreement" I have chosen to ignore them for the sake of other forum members. I tell you what,I haven't abused you personally by name calling,I may have posted on your toilet thread but have been careful not to abuse you personally,I have PM,s from members supporting this and welcoming us burying the hatchet and moving on.Do what you like,I am happy whatever you choose to do.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Jul 29, 2016 7:39:28 GMT
I don't need your permission to do what I like thanks. Why do you always have to bring other people into it? Just because you haven't called me names doesn't mean you haven't been derogatory, so don't come all innocent.
|
|
|
Post by haulierp on Jul 29, 2016 7:41:01 GMT
What a load of bollocks you talk Martin,in your post which is an old one to be fair you clearly state that you feel Moderators are under the cosh, you would say that as clearly you have a foot in both camps which is your prerogative.I disagree with that conclusion and say so not only that, I explain why I disagree.I don't question the validity of anything else you say and I am not interested in peoples moderating experiences only passing a judgement as regards how I and others have been treated by the Cretins across the road. CDS - you would argue black was white, you are indeed an argumentative prick. Your playing the man rather than the post Martin,others will judge what I say and the relevance of it. As for arguing,well you have some experience in that field yourself which is why I am glad you are here.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2016 7:42:24 GMT
I find the fact that some people post more than twenty posts a day and feel it is there job to start debate by prodding other forum members farcical. What makes me chuckle is when we make a post and read it back realising much of it applies to ourselves. When we call others hypocrites for example we might be hypocrites for saying it.
|
|
|
Post by haulierp on Jul 29, 2016 7:52:39 GMT
I don't need your permission to do what I like thanks. Why do you always have to bring other people into it? Just because you haven't called me names doesn't mean you haven't been derogatory, so don't come all innocent. Who said you needed my permission.Its a Forum with members,thats why I bring other people into it. You freely admit I haven't called you names yet you call me one earlier.Derogatory is a broad term so realistically I don't know how you eradicate that from Thunderboat.I firmly believe however if anyone took a look at my comments since peace broke out between us,it would be a strange man indeed who found them derogatory as opposed to harmless jest in tune with the thread at that moment in time.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Jul 29, 2016 7:54:54 GMT
CDS - you would argue black was white, you are indeed an argumentative prick. Your playing the man rather than the post Martin,others will judge what I say and the relevance of it. As for arguing,well you have some experience in that field yourself which is why I am glad you are here. i think your mistaking this forum for another one that you ran to after a public flounce here. Now that they don't want you, your back here. But we don't have "don't play the man rule" here. People are free to say what they like, I know it is so annoying when people do what they want rather than what you want them to. But hey ho.
|
|