Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2016 15:17:12 GMT
Gone to the Supreme Court who will rule on it as soon as they can apparently. Big money being made by the lawyers here I think and I don't mean SHOOSMITHS
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 24, 2016 10:00:07 GMT
I was thinking earlier that The Supreme Court shall probably rule this week regarding the naming of those involved. One of the main reasons quoted by the complainant for the injunction remains the children and adverse effects upon them. What is the impact I wonder on peoples perception of two Gay men with children regarding the monogamy aspect, because what we are seeing is children being used as an excuse to give celebrities carte blanche to do as they like. I remember when I was a teenager a fellow kids mother had a bit of a reputation,so what was the attitude back then,is this affect on children just a spurious argument?
|
|