|
Post by TonyDunkley on Oct 7, 2016 22:20:03 GMT
On the contrary, the 'intention to permanently deprive' has been indicated or demonstrated several times by C&RT in written communications. As for your point re. 'paying his bill', . . . you're overlooking the fact that the bill, now in excess of £40,000 and still climbing, is a contrivance brought about largely [currently in the region of 85% of it] by the outlay on the removal to Sharpness. C&RT don't need convincing about the illegality of what they've done because they already know full well. They're in big trouble, and from in the bottom of the almighty great hole they've dug themselves into this time, the only things left for them are bluster and bullshit. .... ....... .... they have nothing to lose while you keep shooting angry letters at them or their solicitors ..... .... ..... I'm intrigued as to why you assume that's what I am doing, . . . or have been doing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 7, 2016 23:14:25 GMT
.... ....... .... they have nothing to lose while you keep shooting angry letters at them or their solicitors ..... .... ..... I'm intrigued as to why you assume that's what I am doing, . . . or have been doing. Tony, so what are your motives (along with Nigels)? I'm confused... All I know is that the cut is getting more silted, boaters are getting more stressed by signs and enforcemet unjustified by law, yet you guys want to push for equal rights for those who wish to moor outside the navigable channel.. Lol Twat
|
|
|
Post by Graham on Oct 8, 2016 5:39:24 GMT
I'm intrigued as to why you assume that's what I am doing, . . . or have been doing. Because of the way you post, that you don't argue the case just keep shouting theft when it is not etc etc. If you have got a case issue a letter before action, give them 14 days etc get on with it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 8, 2016 7:22:08 GMT
It's people such as Tony and Nigel who are willing to go out of their way to stand up to bullies and fight for fairness and justice, that make the world a safer and more respectable place for us to live in. This is our world as much as that of big over-paid organisations, and it gets up many people's noses to see them swinging their weight (and other peoples' money) around. From what I have read in the past 3 years, it does seem that CRT has created an atmosphere of fear across 'their domain' - as I don't know the details I can't say whether this has been intentional or not. We still don't know how the owner of 'Planet' ran up the original bill. I am sorry to say but in the video where he's calling out from the quayside "That's my ship!" - yes, we know it is - he does make himself look a bit daft. In some way I feel sorry for CRT as they could have been between a rock and a hard place. What would you do if you were a landlord and your tenant was not paying his rent and deliberately taking the piss? However, as they are under scrutiny, I think CRT should have made their actions legally waterproof. There could have been other ways to keep the ship moored at the location and the business running, perhaps, but would the suggestions ("crowdfunding" and such stuff) be practicable? I mean, really? I have read many pages about this on Canalworld yet find it's impossible to comment with any accuracy as the real itty-gritty details are missing. Similar to the 'Rugby Boats Case' featured here! You'll get more comment on the echo articles than on cwdf. Anything with figures mentioned gets zapped. The echo isn't so squimesh about such vulgar things as money. www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/owner-seized-lightship-planet-pleads-11940491
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on Oct 8, 2016 8:03:36 GMT
It's people such as Tony and Nigel who are willing to go out of their way to stand up to bullies and fight for fairness and justice, that make the world a safer and more respectable place for us to live in. This is our world as much as that of big over-paid organisations, and it gets up many people's noses to see them swinging their weight (and other peoples' money) around. From what I have read in the past 3 years, it does seem that CRT has created an atmosphere of fear across 'their domain' - as I don't know the details I can't say whether this has been intentional or not. We still don't know how the owner of 'Planet' ran up the original bill. I am sorry to say but in the video where he's calling out from the quayside "That's my ship!" - yes, we know it is - he does make himself look a bit daft. In some way I feel sorry for CRT as they could have been between a rock and a hard place. What would you do if you were a landlord and your tenant was not paying his rent and deliberately taking the piss? However, as they are under scrutiny, I think CRT should have made their actions legally waterproof. There could have been other ways to keep the ship moored at the location and the business running, perhaps, but would the suggestions ("crowdfunding" and such stuff) be practicable? I mean, really? I have read many pages about this on Canalworld yet find it's impossible to comment with any accuracy as the real itty-gritty details are missing. Similar to the 'Rugby Boats Case' featured here! You'll get more comment on the echo articles than on cwdf. Anything with figures mentioned gets zapped. The echo isn't so squimesh about such vulgar things as money. www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/owner-seized-lightship-planet-pleads-11940491__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ There isn't going to be anything else about the Liverpool Lightship theft on Anal World (No)Discussion Forum at all. Dippy Dan and his menopausal schoolteacher have taken some more posts down, locked the thread, and put me on "permanent suspension".
|
|
|
Post by kris on Oct 8, 2016 8:03:54 GMT
Crt need legally pulling up every time they exceed their legal remit. They need to realise that they have to act legally and proportionally. That they will be held to account for their actions,in the end individuals should be held responsible for their actions even if they are done in the name of an organisation.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Oct 8, 2016 8:07:01 GMT
You'll get more comment on the echo articles than on cwdf. Anything with figures mentioned gets zapped. The echo isn't so squimesh about such vulgar things as money. www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/owner-seized-lightship-planet-pleads-11940491__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ There isn't going to be anything else about the Liverpool Lightship theft on Anal World (No)Discussion Forum at all. Dippy Dan and his menopausal schoolteacher have taken some more posts down, locked the thread, and put me on "permanent suspension". It's become increasingly apparent that crt are pulling dans strings and hence influencing cwdfs moderation policy. It's no accident that most people who are banned have expressed concerns at the actions of crt, I'm amazed you lasted so long Tony.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 8, 2016 8:13:41 GMT
There isn't going to be anything else about the Liverpool Lightship theft on Anal World (No)Discussion Forum at all. Dippy Dan and his menopausal schoolteacher have taken some more posts down, locked the thread, and put me on "permanent suspension". I knew that would happen. They've all been itching to get rid of that thread. Fuckin wankers the lot of them.
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on Oct 8, 2016 8:32:14 GMT
It's become increasingly apparent that crt are pulling dans strings and hence influencing cwdfs moderation policy. It's no accident that most people who are banned have expressed concerns at the actions of crt, I'm amazed you lasted so long Tony. Well, Kris, I'm not that easy to get rid of, . . . BW and now C&RT have been trying for half a century, and I'm still here. C&RT have been getting increasingly nervous and rattled over the last few days about the mess they've got themselves into in Liverpool, and I've no doubt now that they've asked/told CWDF to shut me up. That vacous old trout 'Wrigglefingers' started it all off when I published the ever-rising " Schedule of Interim Costs" that C&RT are concocting. She said they would need the express consent of the owner of "Planet" before it could be disclosed, so I gave them his e-mail and mobile number, . . . and did they contact him ? . . . well, no they didn't, they just blocked any more posts from me about it.
|
|
|
Post by Graham on Oct 8, 2016 8:47:06 GMT
I would suggest that you copy and paste all your posts onto a thread hear. Once you have done it I would tell Nigel where you have gone
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on Oct 8, 2016 8:51:41 GMT
I knew that would happen. They've all been itching to get rid of that thread. Fuckin wankers the lot of them. They've locked the "Boater Sues C&RT for Section 8" thread as well, so despite all the prostestations and assurances I got from Dan over the last two days, this IS all about suppressing anything that shows C&RT up for the arseholes they are.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Oct 8, 2016 8:59:36 GMT
It's become increasingly apparent that crt are pulling dans strings and hence influencing cwdfs moderation policy. It's no accident that most people who are banned have expressed concerns at the actions of crt, I'm amazed you lasted so long Tony. Well, Kris, I'm not that easy to get rid of, . . . BW and now C&RT have been trying for half a century, and I'm still here. C&RT have been getting increasingly nervous and rattled over the last few days about the mess they've got themselves into in Liverpool, and I've no doubt now that they've asked/told CWDF to shut me up. That vacous old trout 'Wrigglefingers' started it all off when I published the ever-rising " Schedule of Interim Costs" that C&RT are concocting. She said they would need the express consent of the owner of "Planet" before it could be disclosed, so I gave them his e-mail and mobile number, . . . and did they contact him ? . . . well, no they didn't, they just blocked any more posts from me about it. I'm shure they are getting nervous. Years ago before mass communications , they could get away with doing what they wanted. Riding rough shod over boat owners and the law. Now that has all changed people are able to educate themselves about the waterways legislation and then freely distribute the imformation to all who are interested. Long may Nigel and yourself continue Tony. As long as boaters stand together in some form and hold a spotlight to the illegal actions of an out of control organisation, then they can be put back in their box.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Oct 8, 2016 9:03:58 GMT
I knew that would happen. They've all been itching to get rid of that thread. Fuckin wankers the lot of them. They've locked the "Boater Sues C&RT for Section 8" thread as well, so despite all the prostestations and assurances I got from Dan over the last two days, this IS all about suppressing anything that shows C&RT up for the arseholes they are. There is no denighing it now, Dan is crt's lacky. He has made cwdf bow to crt's will. So much for free discussion. They can't put the genie back in the bottle though, people are aware of crt's activities.
|
|
|
Post by Graham on Oct 8, 2016 9:33:54 GMT
I would suggest that you copy and paste all your posts onto a thread hear. Once you have done it I would tell Nigel where you have gone If the PMs are not being read (by the mods), then it could be worth PMing the more sensible members of Canalworld just to let them know that this site is running, and running fairly well. That's what I did before they exterminated me. Tony has contributed handsomely to CWDF - and getting rid of him, what is it going to turn into? Mushroom vents polishing chat. Those that want to come over can, and those that decide they're more into wool-spinning and knitting socks for the grandchildren can stay. I hope the site owner of Thunderboat has his hands firmly on the reins and is confident, as this site may grow and grow into 'THE' site for boating. 'The Pit' has been created for all the silly stuff. I think sections for 'mechanical', 'electrical' and 'stoppages' would help this site to become more focused. The lack of over-moderation does seem to have worked here. However, I believe the original intention was just simply to have this place as a spillover for the Virtual Pub bickerings, and, otherwise, to be loyal to CWDF. CWDF as a frontsperson for CRT these days? An interesting take. Maybe the D9 might need help if your wish comes to fruition both financially and with day to day management
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 8, 2016 9:35:19 GMT
Foxys idea of sections for technical questions is a good one. Our resident new boat bulid quaysider will no doubt have plenty to put on there. I can bore everyone senseless about welding. Graham and Nick can get the handbags out over electrical stuff. Graham can champion axiom without fear of being zapped. Kris and Pete can be advisors on sanitation matters. Foxy is the resident Bukh man. John and Tony can fill in most of the other blanks Phil can bring the donut's - probably the most important role of all. Anyone else who had specialist knowledge and I haven't acknowledged I apologise, there's only so much my swede can hold
|
|