|
Post by JohnV on Oct 10, 2016 21:34:40 GMT
I can't remember all the precise details, but Nigel Moore has published all the Court papers on 'Scribd'. Unlike C&RT, and the pathetic, fawning creeps at Analworld forum, the Courts have no objection whatsoever to complete openness, and details of both side's arguments, documentation etc. being made public. The place needs fumigation. It's full of nasty smells. Before all the cutbacks, the council would see to it, but as things are at the moment, I think we would have to employ private contractors. Graham Rabies is one of the most objectionable smells .........
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2016 21:40:08 GMT
The place needs fumigation. It's full of nasty smells. Before all the cutbacks, the council would see to it, but as things are at the moment, I think we would have to employ private contractors. Graham Rabies is one of the most objectionable smells ......... Possibly a side effect from sheep sha##ing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2016 21:50:47 GMT
Interesting that Phil made a post in the wee flounce thread putting Graham Davis in his place, that was moderated (content removed) by wrigglefingers 57 minutes later, however the thread had already been added to by 2 other moderators (32 minutes & 48 minutes after his post). Another example of inconsistancy within the CWDF moderator ranks? Well yes, although to be fair the removed content should have been removed. Name calling adds nothing to an argument, in fact it brings the poster into disrepute and thus the removing of that content was doing him a favour! Says he who often refers to lc as a "rug muncher"........
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Oct 11, 2016 7:28:44 GMT
Well yes, although to be fair the removed content should have been removed. Name calling adds nothing to an argument, in fact it brings the poster into disrepute and thus the removing of that content was doing him a favour! Says he who often refers to lc as a "rug muncher"........ Do I? Could you point us to just one instance of that? (Hint: you will find it difficult). been at the mushrooms again?
|
|
|
Post by bills on Oct 11, 2016 8:07:36 GMT
Says he who often refers to lc as a "rug muncher"........ been at the mushrooms again?
I didn't realise that Brasso had that sort of side effect.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2016 8:19:50 GMT
been at the mushrooms again?
I didn't realise that Brasso had that sort of side effect.
It's probably about the only thing it's good for.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2016 9:32:09 GMT
Says he who often refers to lc as a "rug muncher"........ Do I? Could you point us to just one instance of that? (Hint: you will find it difficult). been at the mushrooms again? No, I'm not going to play the "link" game. I am totally happy with the fact that I have seen you say it. I am also perfectly happy to remind you of it, thus suggesting to you that we all have our moments, you included. I have no problems with preachers, as long as they do not come across as holier than thou.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2016 10:11:52 GMT
Do I? Could you point us to just one instance of that? (Hint: you will find it difficult). been at the mushrooms again? No, I'm not going to play the "link" game. I am totally happy with the fact that I have seen you say it. I am also perfectly happy to remind you of it, thus suggesting to you that we all have our moments, you included. I have no problems with preachers, as long as they do not come across as holier than thou. A search on here would suggest you are incorrect. I have seen the term used by others but not by Nick.
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Oct 11, 2016 10:18:30 GMT
Do I? Could you point us to just one instance of that? (Hint: you will find it difficult). been at the mushrooms again? No, I'm not going to play the "link" game. I am totally happy with the fact that I have seen you say it. I am also perfectly happy to remind you of it, thus suggesting to you that we all have our moments, you included. I have no problems with preachers, as long as they do not come across as holier than thou. I have used the forum search facility to see if I could find an instance. None exists, nothing even close, so you are either lying or very, very confused.
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Oct 11, 2016 10:19:46 GMT
No, I'm not going to play the "link" game. I am totally happy with the fact that I have seen you say it. I am also perfectly happy to remind you of it, thus suggesting to you that we all have our moments, you included. I have no problems with preachers, as long as they do not come across as holier than thou. A search on here would suggest you are incorrect. I have seen the term used by others but not by Nick. Correct, so then I shall hold my breath awaiting a retraction............... oops, I seem to have died.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2016 10:36:32 GMT
A search on here would suggest you are incorrect. I have seen the term used by others but not by Nick. Correct, so then I shall hold my breath awaiting a retraction............... oops, I seem to have died. Yes, carpet muncher was my mistake. The term you used however "It's usually all about cats and carpets", still merits my original statement. 😊
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Oct 11, 2016 10:42:59 GMT
Correct, so then I shall hold my breath awaiting a retraction............... oops, I seem to have died. Yes, carpet muncher was my mistake. The term you used however "It's usually all about cats and carpets", still merits my original statement. 😊 However it wasn't about LC. It was about cats and carpets not about carpet munching. And it was only once. So not really related in anyway to what you said except that I used the word "carpet". Well ok, guilty as charged I suppose. NOT! for those whose main hobby is watching paint dry, here is a link to that post in that thread: thunderboat.boards.net/post/8029/threadAnd for the record, I'm pretty sure that LC isn't a lesbian, not that it is relevant.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2016 10:46:31 GMT
Yes, carpet muncher was my mistake. The term you used however "It's usually all about cats and carpets", still merits my original statement. 😊 However it wasn't about LC. It was about cats and carpets not about carpet munching. And it was only once. So not really related in anyway to what you said except that I used the word "carpet". Well ok, guilty as charged I suppose. NOT! As I stated earlier "I have no problems with preachers, as long as they do not come across as holier than thou". I'll on this occasion, accept your reasoning (escape route).
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Oct 11, 2016 10:47:40 GMT
However it wasn't about LC. It was about cats and carpets not about carpet munching. And it was only once. So not really related in anyway to what you said except that I used the word "carpet". Well ok, guilty as charged I suppose. NOT! As I stated earlier "I have no problems with preachers, as long as they do not come across as holier than thou". I'll on this occasion, accept your reasoning (escape route). xxx but actually just on the point of "preachers", I don't really agree with the argument that one cannot criticise others unless one is perfect. In my old day job I was an examiner and if I had been unable to criticise the faults of others (constructively, of course) then it would have been a rum do and lots of people would have died since for sure, I was not a perfect pilot.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2016 10:55:37 GMT
As I stated earlier "I have no problems with preachers, as long as they do not come across as holier than thou". I'll on this occasion, accept your reasoning (escape route). xxx but actually just on the point of "preachers", I don't really agree with the argument that one cannot criticise others unless one is perfect. In my old day job I was an examiner and if I had been unable to criticise the faults of others (constructively, of course) then it would have been a rum do and lots of people would have died since for sure, I was not a perfect pilot. It's OK nick. You don't have to explain yourself. Carry on with your milky coffee.
|
|