|
Post by naughtyfox on Nov 12, 2020 16:46:20 GMT
How do you explain this, then? "First cruise ship to set sail in the Caribbean since March reports coronavirus case onboard five days into its voyage - despite all 53 passengers testing negative before boarding All 53 passengers are now quarantined as the vessel makes its way back to its point of departure in Barbados The virus case comes despite the cruise ship's rigorous testing system requiring passengers to produce negative results three times None of the passengers visited any island towns during the stops nor did they come in contact with locals on the islands" www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8942099/Passenger-Caribbean-cruise-March-tests-positive-COVID-19.html"An exceptionally good advert for the "freedom pass" being organised by the "experts and politicians" at a fiver a go! Dumb and dumber never had a look in!" "Proves testing is not reliable."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2020 16:59:39 GMT
Maybe one of the passengers had a mink coat.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2020 17:04:22 GMT
My sister has to be tested weekly ... some care homes test every five days ... a test just says negative or positive AT THAT TIME. I wouldn't have thought it was such a difficult concept to grasp ... once again you surprise me naughtyfoxRog
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Nov 12, 2020 17:43:26 GMT
A negative test just means the virus hasn’t got a proper grip and replicated itself enough yet. There are several days between contracting the virus and it being detectable. But still, testing is better than not testing.
|
|
|
Post by perkwunos on Nov 12, 2020 18:30:27 GMT
Maybe one of the passengers had a mink coat. There's a lot of vermin in Scandinavia.
|
|
|
Post by peterboat on Nov 12, 2020 18:35:04 GMT
The problem is these test are about 80% accurate which in the testing world is not bad, anyway if it keeps planes on the ground and the air clean fear of the vaccine isnt a bad thing
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Nov 12, 2020 18:38:17 GMT
My sister has to be tested weekly ... some care homes test every five days ... a test just says negative or positive AT THAT TIME. I wouldn't have thought it was such a difficult concept to grasp ... once again you surprise me naughtyfox Rog So two seconds later you can be positive? "at that time" - what time? It's a bit like a car MoT. Your wheel falls off. You go back to the MoT testing station and say "You gave me a certificate to say my car passed, and the wheel has just fallen off!" ... and they say ... "Well, your car was OK when we tested it, an hour ago..."
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Nov 12, 2020 18:41:18 GMT
Maybe one of the passengers had a mink coat. There's a lot of vermin in Scandinavia. I thought Brazil was riddled with the Coronavirus. Yet, strangely, it hasn't found you yet. You still haven't told us how you ended up in Brazil. Was it to escape the Nuremburg Trials?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2020 18:42:06 GMT
My sister has to be tested weekly ... some care homes test every five days ... a test just says negative or positive AT THAT TIME. I wouldn't have thought it was such a difficult concept to grasp ... once again you surprise me naughtyfox Rog So two seconds later you can be positive? "at that time" - what time? It's a bit like a car MoT. Your wheel falls off. You go back to the MoT testing station and say "You gave me a certificate to say my car passed, and the wheel has just fallen off!" ... and they say ... "Well, your car was OK when we tested it, an hour ago..." Pretty much right. Would you be in favour of scrapping the MoT on that basis?
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Nov 12, 2020 18:46:48 GMT
So two seconds later you can be positive? "at that time" - what time? It's a bit like a car MoT. Your wheel falls off. You go back to the MoT testing station and say "You gave me a certificate to say my car passed, and the wheel has just fallen off!" ... and they say ... "Well, your car was OK when we tested it, an hour ago..." Pretty much right. Would you be in favour of scrapping the MoT on that basis? I would be in favour of scrapping the piss-poor MoT cowboys, yes. Mechanics who really know their stuff are worth more than gold. I am in favour of an MoT being demanded once a month. Safety first. Always good to have wheel bearings checked as often as possible.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Nov 12, 2020 18:49:18 GMT
So two seconds later you can be positive? "at that time" - what time? It's a bit like a car MoT. Your wheel falls off. You go back to the MoT testing station and say "You gave me a certificate to say my car passed, and the wheel has just fallen off!" ... and they say ... "Well, your car was OK when we tested it, an hour ago..." Pretty much right. Would you be in favour of scrapping the MoT on that basis? Might as well scrap CRT's BSS test for as soon as the BSS man (never a woman, is it? where are you, girlies? wimminz power an' all that) buggers off, 50% of boaters bring back their petrol-powered generator from around the corner, and re-fill their gas lockers with fishing rods and all manner of miscellaneous junk.
|
|
|
Post by bodger on Nov 12, 2020 21:57:32 GMT
pathetic attention seeking. go to bed. it might be better in the morning.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Nov 12, 2020 22:05:55 GMT
if it keeps planes on the ground and the air clean fear of the vaccine isnt a bad thing Unless of course you work in the aviation industry and depend on your wages to pay the bills.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2020 22:12:59 GMT
I reckon it's best to get the .gov to pay the bills.
I'm like "people. Hear me. Stop the toil. Watch them watch you starve".
The state can fund all sorts of shit you could never imagine.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2020 0:54:18 GMT
My sister has to be tested weekly ... some care homes test every five days ... a test just says negative or positive AT THAT TIME. I wouldn't have thought it was such a difficult concept to grasp ... once again you surprise me naughtyfoxRog This is why the number of 'cases' stat is reported higher than it is in reality. It even used to say that on the NHS site.
|
|