|
Post by JohnV on Oct 21, 2016 22:22:16 GMT
I had it in mind that those who had been hard done by / mistreated by that forum would be interested in seeing it being revealed as a "miscarriage of justice" but if I'm wrong then I apologise. Anyway, I'll probably be banned soon so it will stop! Thankyou Nick I appreciate your efforts Like Jenlyn I dislike being called a liar
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2016 22:26:30 GMT
I had it in mind that those who had been hard done by / mistreated by that forum would be interested in seeing it being revealed as a "miscarriage of justice" but if I'm wrong then I apologise. Anyway, I'll probably be banned soon so it will stop! Thankyou Nick I appreciate your efforts Like Jenlyn I dislike being called a liar Maybe I've missed a trick here guys. Can someone explain please?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2016 22:29:12 GMT
I had it in mind that those who had been hard done by / mistreated by that forum would be interested in seeing it being revealed as a "miscarriage of justice" but if I'm wrong then I apologise. Anyway, I'll probably be banned soon so it will stop! Thankyou Nick I appreciate your efforts Like Jenlyn I dislike being called a liar I am so impressed with his dogged approach, that I have decided to buy him a pressy next time I pass Anne summers.
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Oct 21, 2016 22:38:35 GMT
Thankyou Nick I appreciate your efforts Like Jenlyn I dislike being called a liar I am so impressed with his dogged approach, that I have decided to buy him a pressy next time I pass Anne summers. You are too kind!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2016 22:40:43 GMT
I am so impressed with his dogged approach, that I have decided to buy him a pressy next time I pass Anne summers. You are too kind! Yes, I have my moments.
|
|
|
Post by JohnV on Oct 21, 2016 22:41:47 GMT
Thankyou Nick I appreciate your efforts Like Jenlyn I dislike being called a liar Maybe I've missed a trick here guys. Can someone explain please? It was said that we were given proper information about complaints against us ..... that we had either been on modque or had multiple warnings before the ban hammer that we were lying about not being able to see the reasons for banning etc etc That no one was ever banned without having received multiple warnings blah blah blah
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2016 22:43:46 GMT
I had it in mind that those who had been hard done by / mistreated by that forum would be interested in seeing it being revealed as a "miscarriage of justice" but if I'm wrong then I apologise. Anyway, I'll probably be banned soon so it will stop! Thankyou Nick I appreciate your efforts Like Jenlyn I dislike being called a liar Ah, are you guys talking about this post? www.canalworld.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=88020&p=1904575Sorry, I'm a bit slow tonight. Other stuff on my mind I guess. I'm a bit confused about the liar bit. Maybe I should go to bed.
|
|
|
Post by Delta9 on Oct 21, 2016 22:53:26 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2016 22:55:47 GMT
Maybe I've missed a trick here guys. Can someone explain please? It was said that we were given proper information about complaints against us ..... that we had either been on modque or had multiple warnings before the ban hammer that we were lying about not being able to see the reasons for banning etc etc That no one was ever banned without having received multiple warnings blah blah blah Thanks John. Well I never got an explaination for the ban, but I had just received 2 warnings from LC in close succession. If I remember the warnings were for biting on bait from 2 of the usual suspects. I sent a message to the team saying I felt picked on, and that LC was killing off any humour. Then I was zapped. No email, couldn't log on to find out why I was banned. That for me was the end of the matter but admit I have done my fair stare of whinging on here It sounds like some of you were treated worse if you had no warnings first. I can see why you'd feel pissed off.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2016 23:01:39 GMT
Sorry, missed that too. Now I see! Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by JohnV on Oct 21, 2016 23:05:26 GMT
It was said that we were given proper information about complaints against us ..... that we had either been on modque or had multiple warnings before the ban hammer that we were lying about not being able to see the reasons for banning etc etc That no one was ever banned without having received multiple warnings blah blah blah Thanks John. Well I never got an explaination for the ban but I had just received 2 warnings from LC in close succession. If I remember the warnings for biting on bait from 2 of the usual suspects. I sent a message to the team saying I felt picked on ans that LC was killing off any humour. Then I was zapped. No email, couldn't log on to find out why I was banned. That for me was the end of the matter but admit I have done my fair stare of whinging on here It sounds like some of you were treated worse if you had no warnings first. I can see why you'd feel pissed off. Like you I rose to bait, but it was the way BoB wiped my post but left the one accusing me (favoured member ). When I complained same again, I shouldn't have risen but I suppose sooner or later they would have found something.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2016 23:15:41 GMT
but it was the way BoB wiped my post but left the one accusing me (favoured member ). That was the one thing that really pissed me off, they made a habit of doing that. I had it happen several times. It's bullying pure and simple, and shows completely that they can only wield and enjoy such power whilst hidden behind a pc screen. I've seen several of the gutless pillocks this summer, and they turned away, or bowed their heads rather than face up. Spineless and pathetic.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2016 23:19:58 GMT
Thanks John. Well I never got an explaination for the ban but I had just received 2 warnings from LC in close succession. If I remember the warnings for biting on bait from 2 of the usual suspects. I sent a message to the team saying I felt picked on ans that LC was killing off any humour. Then I was zapped. No email, couldn't log on to find out why I was banned. That for me was the end of the matter but admit I have done my fair stare of whinging on here It sounds like some of you were treated worse if you had no warnings first. I can see why you'd feel pissed off. Like you I rose to bait, but it was the way BoB wiped my post but left the one accusing me (favoured member ). When I complained same again, I shouldn't have risen but I suppose sooner or later they would have found something. It does feel that they have targeted people rather than the posts. Maybe Jenlyn is right about Dan picking on those with a pro Brexit stance. Well that would be me then too. I also believe I was picked on because of my personal beliefs. I had some great debates about religion and philosophy with athiests on there without anything kicking off. I don't think it's a coincidence the subject got banned soon after too. Maybe the miss-management team couldn't keep up. But as I say, what is everyone looking for? Legal action, relaxing of rules on CWF, change of shite owner? Or just recognition they cocked up with an apology?
|
|
|
Post by JohnV on Oct 21, 2016 23:29:14 GMT
Like you I rose to bait, but it was the way BoB wiped my post but left the one accusing me (favoured member ). When I complained same again, I shouldn't have risen but I suppose sooner or later they would have found something. It does feel that they have targeted people rather than the posts. Maybe Jenlyn is right about Dan picking on those with a pro Brexit stance. Well that would be me then too. I also believe I was picked on because of my personal beliefs. I had some great debates about religion and philosophy with athiests on there without anything kicking off. I don't think it's a coincidence the subject got banned soon after too. Maybe the miss-management team couldn't keep up. But as I say, what is everyone looking for? Legal action, relaxing of rules on CWF, change of shite owner? Or just recognition they cocked up with an apology? I'm not sure I want anything personally, I suppose the muck and double dealing thats coming out is making me feel a bit better but what ever happens over there, I'm settled here now
|
|
|
Post by PaulG2 on Oct 22, 2016 1:44:56 GMT
It does feel that they have targeted people rather than the posts. Maybe Jenlyn is right about Dan picking on those with a pro Brexit stance. Well that would be me then too. I also believe I was picked on because of my personal beliefs. I had some great debates about religion and philosophy with athiests on there without anything kicking off. I don't think it's a coincidence the subject got banned soon after too. Maybe the miss-management team couldn't keep up. But as I say, what is everyone looking for? Legal action, relaxing of rules on CWF, change of shite owner? Or just recognition they cocked up with an apology? I'm not sure I want anything personally, I suppose the muck and double dealing thats coming out is making me feel a bit better but what ever happens over there, I'm settled here now I feel pretty much the same as you. There's no way I would go back to cwdf. Thunderboat has turned into a right nice community and, with all the new members, it won't be long before the diversity of subjects increases too. But that doesn't mean I can't watch Daniel Hutchinson and his illustrious gang of keystone mods destroy cwf. Dan's latest posts have just been priceless. He's jumping up and down and stomping his feet like a petulant four-year-old child. As happens to most petulant children, he is being ignored by the members. He played his best hand and lost. The antagonists don't care if he bans them, MtB as much as dared Dan to ban him. All he can do is lock threads and make them disappear, but as soon as he does, those who don't care if they are banned start another one. I don't know what Dan will try to do to top his "This stops NOW!" post. That was comedy gold and may just end up being his personal best.
|
|