|
Post by TonyDunkley on Sept 11, 2021 17:43:17 GMT
If you want to persist, along with the other forum lowlifes, Shit-for-Brains and Kris, in maintaining that I'm a liar and was not living aboard "Halcyon Daze", when I was unlawfully evicted from the boat prior to it being unlawfully seized by bogus Bailiffs supplied by Commercial Boat Services and working under C&RT instruction and supervision on 22 October 2020, . . then all three of you had better start coming up with some evidence to back up what you're saying, . . or shut-up ! “We” don’t need evidence, “we” have nothing to prove or recover. You’re never going to be the winner, because you’re a loser. (As well as a pathological liar). If you want to persist, along with the other forum lowlifes, Shit-for-Brains and Kris, in maintaining that I'm a liar and was not living aboard "Halcyon Daze", when I was unlawfully evicted from the boat prior to it being unlawfully seized by bogus Bailiffs supplied by Commercial Boat Services and working under C&RT instruction and supervision on 22 October 2020, . . then all three of you had better start coming up with some evidence to back up what you're saying, . . or shut-up !
|
|
|
Post by kris on Sept 11, 2021 17:43:20 GMT
If you want to persist, along with the other forum lowlifes, Shit-for-Brains and Kris, in maintaining that I'm a liar and was not living aboard "Halcyon Daze", when I was unlawfully evicted from the boat prior to it being unlawfully seized by bogus Bailiffs supplied by Commercial Boat Services and working under C&RT instruction and supervision on 22 October 2020, . . then all three of you had better start coming up with some evidence to back up what you're saying, . . or shut-up ! “We” don’t need evidence, “we” have nothing to prove or recover. You’re never going to be the winner, because you’re a loser. (As well as a pathological liar). It just encourages him.
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on Sept 11, 2021 17:55:34 GMT
“We” don’t need evidence, “we” have nothing to prove or recover. You’re never going to be the winner, because you’re a loser. (As well as a pathological liar). It just encourages him. If you want to persist, along with the other forum lowlifes, Shit-for-Brains and JJ [the arsehole that stole the ACC subscriptions -- under yet another alias] in maintaining that I'm a liar and was not living aboard "Halcyon Daze", when I was unlawfully evicted from the boat prior to it being unlawfully seized by bogus Bailiffs supplied by Commercial Boat Services and working under C&RT instruction and supervision on 22 October 2020, . . then all three of you had better start coming up with some evidence to back up what you're saying, . . or shut-up !
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on Sept 11, 2021 18:43:58 GMT
There is a connection. He is, after all, the last, probably the only, old age pensioner on record to assault and injure C&RT's phony/bogus Bailiffs when they turned up with, Stuart Garner, that little shit of a 'Customer/Licence Support Supervisor', to steal and to evict him from the boat he lived on. And what injuries exactly did you inflict? P.S. You weren't living on the boat. You were living in a caravan. Find out for yourself, . . the unregistered, uncertificated, bogus Bailiff who was injured was one Gerard Mills, working for a company trading under the name of Grey Knight Ltd [Enforcement Services] < info.greyknightltd@gmail.com > Mobile No. 07460 139010. When asked by Nottinghamshire Police if he wanted me charged with assault (occasioning actual bodily harm), Mills declined. What do you think could have prompted him to refuse ? If you want to persist, along with the other forum lowlifes, Kris and JJ [the arsehole that stole the ACC subscriptions -- under yet another alias] in maintaining that I'm a liar and was not living aboard "Halcyon Daze", when I was unlawfully evicted from the boat prior to it being unlawfully seized by bogus Bailiffs supplied by Commercial Boat Services and working under C&RT instruction and supervision on 22 October 2020, . . then all three of you had better start coming up with some evidence to back up what you're saying, . . or shut-up !
|
|
|
Post by Trina on Sept 11, 2021 18:57:43 GMT
Why am I thinking of the film,'Groundhog Day'?🤔...
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Sept 11, 2021 19:00:25 GMT
And what injuries exactly did you inflict? P.S. You weren't living on the boat. You were living in a caravan. If you want to persist, along with the other forum lowlifes, Kris and JJ [the arsehole that stole the ACC subscriptions -- under yet another alias] in maintaining that I'm a liar and was not living aboard "Halcyon Daze", when I was unlawfully evicted from the boat prior to it being unlawfully seized by bogus Bailiffs supplied by Commercial Boat Services and working under C&RT instruction and supervision on 22 October 2020, . . then all three of you had better start coming up with some evidence to back up what you're saying, . . or shut-up ! Where were you at the exact moment that the bailiffs arrived at Halcyon Daze?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2021 19:02:40 GMT
We've noticed since the sad events earlier this year at Aylsebury, that number takers appear to be less obviously wearing C&RT gear, and tend to pass boats and stop once clear to upload the numbers (often on bikes).
We surmised that as a group they've been advised against engaging to avoid conflict .
Seems a shame that such an innocuous process should cause any problems.
Rog
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Sept 11, 2021 19:04:08 GMT
And what injuries exactly did you inflict? P.S. You weren't living on the boat. You were living in a caravan. Find out for yourself, . . the unregistered, uncertificated, bogus Bailiff who was injured was one Gerard Mills, working for a company trading under the name of Grey Knight Ltd [Enforcement Services] < info.greyknightltd@gmail.com > Mobile No. 07460 139010. When asked by Nottinghamshire Police if he wanted me charged with assault (occasioning actual bodily harm), Mills declined. What do you think could have prompted him to refuse ? I've no idea and I see little point in contacting him when a member of this very forum was there at the time and could supply the answer. But as you obviously prefer not to say I'll draw my inferences from that.
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on Sept 11, 2021 21:25:39 GMT
If you want to persist, along with the other forum lowlifes, Kris and JJ [the arsehole that stole the ACC subscriptions -- under yet another alias] in maintaining that I'm a liar and was not living aboard "Halcyon Daze", when I was unlawfully evicted from the boat prior to it being unlawfully seized by bogus Bailiffs supplied by Commercial Boat Services and working under C&RT instruction and supervision on 22 October 2020, . . then all three of you had better start coming up with some evidence to back up what you're saying, . . or shut-up ! Where were you at the exact moment that the bailiffs arrived at Halcyon Daze? When C&RT and the bogus Bailiffs arrived at my mooring on the morning of 22 October 2020, I was onboard "Halcyon Daze", inside the main accommodation cabin, and alerted to their presence by the movement of the boat and the sounds of someone clambering aboard. As will be apparent from the following passages from the Nottinghamshire Police report into their whitewashing of the formal complaint regarding the force's mishandling of the 22 October 2020 incident, the C&RT and the Nottinghamshire Police versions of the events of that morning tell a very different story from the speculative garbage that's been maliciously posted on this forum under the guise of being factual truth : Extracts from report dated 7 January 2021 by : PS 3656 Stephen Mackell Reasonable Proportionate Handling Complaints Professional Standards Directorate Notts Police FHQ Sherwood Lodge. "Following our conversation on 27/11/2020 you stated that you wished to complain about the actions of four Nottinghamshire Police Officers and a failure to take a report of a criminal fraud. You explained that your boat was seized using an order which was out of date by fourteen months on the day of seizure, and the police officers who attended the incident failed to check the identification of the individuals seizing your boat. You stated that when your boat was seized several people entered your boat and told you to leave so you used force to remove them. You explained that the police officers in attendance informed you that you had to leave your boat or you would be arrested, the boat would be seized anyway and you would spend time in a cell."
"I have reviewed police systems and note that an incident report was created on 22/10/2020 at 09:17 hours when a 999 call was made to Nottinghamshire Police by Mr Stuart Garner, of the Canal and River Trust, reporting that whilst trying to seize your boat you have assaulted an enforcement officer. I have reviewed the recording of this 999 call and note that you can be heard in the back ground threatening to “shove” someone, before Mr Garner then informs the control room operator that you have assaulted an enforcement officer. Mr Garner explains that he is an enforcement officer for the Canal and River Trust and in attendance were two of his colleagues and two additional enforcement officers, and he has d ocumentation to show to officers on arrival."
"Four police officers attended this incident; Pc 1971 Anderson, Pc 2276 Kelly, Pc 3390 McAuley and Pc 1558 Cartwright. A crime report for common assault was subsequently recorded, with you as the suspect, under reference 20000557895. Pc Cartwright was assigned as the Officer in the Case and so I have discussed this incident with him. Pc Cartwright explains he and his colleagues were requested to attend the incident location following a report that an enforcement officer, Mr Gerard Mills, had been assaulted by you whilst enforcing a court order. Mr Mills informed officers that he was an enforcement officer employed by Greyknight Ltd and had been on your boat attempting to explain the seizure of your boat when you pushed him over causing him to strike his shin on a plank."
"Pc Cartwright reviewed the court order paperwork and identified that it was still valid, and the 2019 date was a deadline by which you were given to pay for a licence in order to keep your boat moored on the river. Pc Cartwright confirms that he verified the details of those present, and as stated earlier they were all either employees of the Canal and River Trust or Greyknight Ltd, who had been hired by the Canal and River Trust to assist them. Pc Cartwright explains that Mr Mills did not wish to support a prosecution for assault and so a decision was made that no further action would be taken against you regarding this allegation."_______________________________________
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2021 22:09:13 GMT
Where were you at the exact moment that the bailiffs arrived at Halcyon Daze? When C&RT and the bogus Bailiffs arrived at my mooring on the morning of 22 October 2020, I was onboard "Halcyon Daze", inside the main accommodation cabin, and alerted to their presence by the movement of the boat and the sounds of someone clambering aboard. As will be apparent from the following passages from the Nottinghamshire Police report into their whitewashing of the formal complaint regarding the force's mishandling of the 22 October 2020 incident, the C&RT and the Nottinghamshire Police versions of the events of that morning tell a very different story from the speculative garbage that's been maliciously posted on this forum under the guise of being factual truth : Extracts from report dated 7 January 2021 by : PS 3656 Stephen Mackell Reasonable Proportionate Handling Complaints Professional Standards Directorate Notts Police FHQ Sherwood Lodge. "Following our conversation on 27/11/2020 you stated that you wished to complain about the actions of four Nottinghamshire Police Officers and a failure to take a report of a criminal fraud. You explained that your boat was seized using an order which was out of date by fourteen months on the day of seizure, and the police officers who attended the incident failed to check the identification of the individuals seizing your boat. You stated that when your boat was seized several people entered your boat and told you to leave so you used force to remove them. You explained that the police officers in attendance informed you that you had to leave your boat or you would be arrested, the boat would be seized anyway and you would spend time in a cell."
"I have reviewed police systems and note that an incident report was created on 22/10/2020 at 09:17 hours when a 999 call was made to Nottinghamshire Police by Mr Stuart Garner, of the Canal and River Trust, reporting that whilst trying to seize your boat you have assaulted an enforcement officer. I have reviewed the recording of this 999 call and note that you can be heard in the back ground threatening to “shove” someone, before Mr Garner then informs the control room operator that you have assaulted an enforcement officer. Mr Garner explains that he is an enforcement officer for the Canal and River Trust and in attendance were two of his colleagues and two additional enforcement officers, and he has d ocumentation to show to officers on arrival."
"Four police officers attended this incident; Pc 1971 Anderson, Pc 2276 Kelly, Pc 3390 McAuley and Pc 1558 Cartwright. A crime report for common assault was subsequently recorded, with you as the suspect, under reference 20000557895. Pc Cartwright was assigned as the Officer in the Case and so I have discussed this incident with him. Pc Cartwright explains he and his colleagues were requested to attend the incident location following a report that an enforcement officer, Mr Gerard Mills, had been assaulted by you whilst enforcing a court order. Mr Mills informed officers that he was an enforcement officer employed by Greyknight Ltd and had been on your boat attempting to explain the seizure of your boat when you pushed him over causing him to strike his shin on a plank."
"Pc Cartwright reviewed the court order paperwork and identified that it was still valid, and the 2019 date was a deadline by which you were given to pay for a licence in order to keep your boat moored on the river. Pc Cartwright confirms that he verified the details of those present, and as stated earlier they were all either employees of the Canal and River Trust or Greyknight Ltd, who had been hired by the Canal and River Trust to assist them. Pc Cartwright explains that Mr Mills did not wish to support a prosecution for assault and so a decision was made that no further action would be taken against you regarding this allegation."_______________________________________ That doesn’t prove anything. The fact still remains that you were not living on the boat. This is why canal and river twust were able to remove the boat. If you had been living on the boat, and it was your only place of abode, they could not have taken it, because the law at the time banned eviction. You seem to think that waving your arms about and disturbing the smoke will create a diversionary sense of the truth, but it doesn’t. Mr Mills was a bit sly though, dropping any allegations of assault, denying you the chance of a court hearing.
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on Sept 11, 2021 22:32:53 GMT
When C&RT and the bogus Bailiffs arrived at my mooring on the morning of 22 October 2020, I was onboard "Halcyon Daze", inside the main accommodation cabin, and alerted to their presence by the movement of the boat and the sounds of someone clambering aboard. As will be apparent from the following passages from the Nottinghamshire Police report into their whitewashing of the formal complaint regarding the force's mishandling of the 22 October 2020 incident, the C&RT and the Nottinghamshire Police versions of the events of that morning tell a very different story from the speculative garbage that's been maliciously posted on this forum under the guise of being factual truth : Extracts from report dated 7 January 2021 by : PS 3656 Stephen Mackell Reasonable Proportionate Handling Complaints Professional Standards Directorate Notts Police FHQ Sherwood Lodge. "Following our conversation on 27/11/2020 you stated that you wished to complain about the actions of four Nottinghamshire Police Officers and a failure to take a report of a criminal fraud. You explained that your boat was seized using an order which was out of date by fourteen months on the day of seizure, and the police officers who attended the incident failed to check the identification of the individuals seizing your boat. You stated that when your boat was seized several people entered your boat and told you to leave so you used force to remove them. You explained that the police officers in attendance informed you that you had to leave your boat or you would be arrested, the boat would be seized anyway and you would spend time in a cell."
"I have reviewed police systems and note that an incident report was created on 22/10/2020 at 09:17 hours when a 999 call was made to Nottinghamshire Police by Mr Stuart Garner, of the Canal and River Trust, reporting that whilst trying to seize your boat you have assaulted an enforcement officer. I have reviewed the recording of this 999 call and note that you can be heard in the back ground threatening to “shove” someone, before Mr Garner then informs the control room operator that you have assaulted an enforcement officer. Mr Garner explains that he is an enforcement officer for the Canal and River Trust and in attendance were two of his colleagues and two additional enforcement officers, and he has d ocumentation to show to officers on arrival."
"Four police officers attended this incident; Pc 1971 Anderson, Pc 2276 Kelly, Pc 3390 McAuley and Pc 1558 Cartwright. A crime report for common assault was subsequently recorded, with you as the suspect, under reference 20000557895. Pc Cartwright was assigned as the Officer in the Case and so I have discussed this incident with him. Pc Cartwright explains he and his colleagues were requested to attend the incident location following a report that an enforcement officer, Mr Gerard Mills, had been assaulted by you whilst enforcing a court order. Mr Mills informed officers that he was an enforcement officer employed by Greyknight Ltd and had been on your boat attempting to explain the seizure of your boat when you pushed him over causing him to strike his shin on a plank."
"Pc Cartwright reviewed the court order paperwork and identified that it was still valid, and the 2019 date was a deadline by which you were given to pay for a licence in order to keep your boat moored on the river. Pc Cartwright confirms that he verified the details of those present, and as stated earlier they were all either employees of the Canal and River Trust or Greyknight Ltd, who had been hired by the Canal and River Trust to assist them. Pc Cartwright explains that Mr Mills did not wish to support a prosecution for assault and so a decision was made that no further action would be taken against you regarding this allegation."_______________________________________ That doesn’t prove anything. The fact still remains that you were not living on the boat. This is why canal and river twust were able to remove the boat. If you had been living on the boat, and it was your only place of abode, they could not have taken it, because the law at the time banned eviction. You seem to think that waving your arms about and disturbing the smoke will create a diversionary sense of the truth, but it doesn’t. Mr Mills was a bit sly though, dropping any allegations of assault, denying you the chance of a court hearing. Why do you persist in constantly repeating this garbage about me not living aboard, when it's just malicious speculation that there's no evidence or proof of ?
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Sept 11, 2021 22:41:57 GMT
I have to say that whilst not absolutely categorical, the evidence presented strongly indicates that Tony was already aboard when CRT arrived. Presumably this was early morning and if he wasn’t resident on the boat it seems unlikely he would have been there at crack of dawn, presuming there was no significant warning of CRT’s arrival. No evidence is presented to show that he wasn’t resident on the boat. So on balance I would say that he had slept on the boat and with that in mind, it’s highly likely that he was living on the boat at the time.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2021 22:47:00 GMT
That doesn’t prove anything. The fact still remains that you were not living on the boat. This is why canal and river twust were able to remove the boat. If you had been living on the boat, and it was your only place of abode, they could not have taken it, because the law at the time banned eviction. You seem to think that waving your arms about and disturbing the smoke will create a diversionary sense of the truth, but it doesn’t. Mr Mills was a bit sly though, dropping any allegations of assault, denying you the chance of a court hearing. Why do you persist with this speculative garbage about me not living aboard, when it's just malicious speculation that there's no evidence or proof of ? You weren’t living aboard. Obviously I can see why you wouldn’t want that to be common knowledge, but you’re fucked over by the eviction bit. Add to that the input from other Boaters in the area who state you were not living on the boat, and I struggle to understand why you you refer to it as malicious speculation. You have basically admitted to not living on the boat, but failed to recognise how you did this.
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on Sept 12, 2021 7:52:00 GMT
Why do you persist with this speculative garbage about me not living aboard, when it's just malicious speculation that there's no evidence or proof of ? You weren’t living aboard. Obviously I can see why you wouldn’t want that to be common knowledge, but you’re fucked over by the eviction bit. Add to that the input from other Boaters in the area who state you were not living on the boat, and I struggle to understand why you you refer to it as malicious speculation. You have basically admitted to not living on the boat, but failed to recognise how you did this. So, this "input" about me not living aboard has come from "other Boaters in the area" has it ? Who ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2021 8:50:44 GMT
I know it's a bit personal but there is quite a lot of personal detail to this thread so can you tell us what your accomodation is now? Land, on a boat or in a vehicle? Given that you have internet access I would tend to rule out the chance of you living under a bridge. As for living on the boat at the time of seizure I agree with Telemachus on the balance of probability you probably were "living on the boat" but one suspects there were other arrangements in place so it's possible that CRT had observed via their data collectors that the boat was used "sporadically" rather than being a full time residence. It's actually quite difficult to prove this either way but the fact is the boat has gone and -probably- been sold. A trip to Greenwalls Farm might prove that CRT still have it. I'm very interested in how one would define "living on the boat" for people who also have other accomodation arrangements for themselves. Staying on it now and then overnight? I personally think one should ignore comments from people who are known to inhabit the bowels of facebook, because there are a lot of private groups on there. They could be discussing you and you would never know. For example I know that it was discussed that I might be the person nicking things from other people's boats in Limehouse. Some people might think it actually was me but as this all comes from the alimentary canal of the world's biggest social media platform I believe it is worthless.
|
|