|
Post by Telemachus on Sept 12, 2021 9:17:56 GMT
Chatting with our BSS examiner on the subject of liveaboard or not (for gas safe purposes) he said it was completely obvious when one stepped onto a boat, whether it was liveaboard or not, just by looking at what was visible on the boat. In our case, when you step onto our boat it is obviously not live aboard.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2021 9:20:06 GMT
Chatting with our BSS examiner on the subject of liveaboard or not (for gas safe purposes) he said it was completely obvious when one stepped onto a boat, whether it was liveaboard or not, just by looking at what was visible on the boat. In our case, when you step onto our boat it is obviously not live aboard. I don’t think that will be a revelation to anyone.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2021 9:39:23 GMT
I guess with your new duties, your saving money on not having to buy sweeties?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2021 9:42:52 GMT
Bus wanker.
|
|
|
Post by thebfg on Sept 12, 2021 10:38:43 GMT
I have to say that whilst not absolutely categorical, the evidence presented strongly indicates that Tony was already aboard when CRT arrived. Presumably this was early morning and if he wasn’t resident on the boat it seems unlikely he would have been there at crack of dawn, presuming there was no significant warning of CRT’s arrival. No evidence is presented to show that he wasn’t resident on the boat. So on balance I would say that he had slept on the boat and with that in mind, it’s highly likely that he was living on the boat at the time. The same conclusion I came to. Unless of course the otherwise want to show us something they are hiding.
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on Sept 13, 2021 10:47:21 GMT
Why do you persist with this speculative garbage about me not living aboard, when it's just malicious speculation that there's no evidence or proof of ? You weren’t living aboard. Obviously I can see why you wouldn’t want that to be common knowledge, but you’re fucked over by the eviction bit. Add to that the input from other Boaters in the area who state you were not living on the boat, and I struggle to understand why you you refer to it as malicious speculation. You have basically admitted to not living on the boat, but failed to recognise how you did this. I refer to the garbage that YOU are misrepresenting as factual, as 'malicious speculation' because that is precisely what it is ! If these "other Boaters in the area" whose "input" you set so much store by do actually exist, I would appreciate being given their names, locations, and any other contact details you have.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2021 11:00:14 GMT
You weren’t living aboard. Obviously I can see why you wouldn’t want that to be common knowledge, but you’re fucked over by the eviction bit. Add to that the input from other Boaters in the area who state you were not living on the boat, and I struggle to understand why you you refer to it as malicious speculation. You have basically admitted to not living on the boat, but failed to recognise how you did this. I refer to the garbage that YOU are misrepresenting as factual, as 'malicious speculation' because that is precisely what it is ! If these "other Boaters in the area" whose "input" you set so much store by do actually exist, I would appreciate being given their names, locations, and any other contact details you have. You know its not going to happen, so bother wasting your time with these demands, move on..
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on Sept 13, 2021 11:51:27 GMT
There is a connection. He is, after all, the last, probably the only, old age pensioner on record to assault and injure C&RT's phony/bogus Bailiffs when they turned up with, Stuart Garner, that little shit of a 'Customer/Licence Support Supervisor', to steal and to evict him from the boat he lived on. And what injuries exactly did you inflict? P.S. You weren't living on the boat. You were living in a caravan. Extracts from report dated 7 January 2021 by : PS 3656 Stephen Mackell Reasonable Proportionate Handling Complaints Professional Standards Directorate Notts Police FHQ Sherwood Lodge. "I have reviewed police systems and note that an incident report was created on 22/10/2020 at 09:17 hours when a 999 call was made to Nottinghamshire Police by Mr Stuart Garner, of the Canal and River Trust, reporting that whilst trying to seize your boat you have assaulted an enforcement officer.
I have reviewed the recording of this 999 call and note that you can be heard in the back ground threatening to “shove” someone, before Mr Garner then informs the control room operator that you have assaulted an enforcement officer. Mr Garner explains that he is an enforcement officer for the Canal and River Trust and in attendance were two of his colleagues and two additional enforcement officers, and he has d ocumentation to show to officers on arrival."
"Four police officers attended this incident; Pc 1971 Anderson, Pc 2276 Kelly, Pc 3390 McAuley and Pc 1558 Cartwright. A crime report for common assault was subsequently recorded, with you as the suspect, under reference 20000557895.
Pc Cartwright was assigned as the Officer in the Case and so I have discussed this incident with him.
Pc Cartwright explains he and his colleagues were requested to attend the incident location following a report that an enforcement officer, Mr Gerard Mills, had been assaulted by you whilst enforcing a court order.
Mr Mills informed officers that he was an enforcement officer employed by Greyknight Ltd and had been on your boat attempting to explain the seizure of your boat when you pushed him over causing him to strike his shin on a plank."
"Pc Cartwright explains that Mr Mills did not wish to support a prosecution for assault and so a decision was made that no further action would be taken against you regarding this allegation."
_______________________________________ As for your repetition of the misinformation with regard to my having accommodation elsewhere and not living aboard "Halcyon Daze", . . is this simply you regurgitating something that you've been pre-programmed with by JJ, or do you have other contacts that you'll admit to for sourcing your supply of mindless claptrap ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2021 12:13:02 GMT
It would be good if all those taunting Tony (yep, I'm not exactly free of guilt here either) would just give it a rest and leave it to pond life such as Steve. If nothing else Tony has shown he's in it for the long term and nothing anybody can say will alter his stance. I suppose it can be difficult not to respond to an insult but all it does is feed the fire. Consider what a better place the forum is since Ross turned the tap off.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2021 12:24:37 GMT
It would be good if all those taunting Tony (yep, I'm not exactly free of guilt here either) would just give it a rest and leave it to pond life such as Steve. If nothing else Tony has shown he's in it for the long term and nothing anybody can say will alter his stance. I suppose it can be difficult not to respond to an insult but all it does is feed the fire. Consider what a better place the forum is since Ross turned the tap off. I've got them both on ignore, life is better that way 😎
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2021 12:37:21 GMT
It would be good if all those taunting Tony (yep, I'm not exactly free of guilt here either) would just give it a rest and leave it to pond life such as Steve. If nothing else Tony has shown he's in it for the long term and nothing anybody can say will alter his stance. I suppose it can be difficult not to respond to an insult but all it does is feed the fire. Consider what a better place the forum is since Ross turned the tap off. The only pond life here is you, though I prefer to believe you’re just a mouthy fucktard looking to make yourself noticed, and get a response so you can play on that as well. Well there’s your response 🙂
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on Sept 13, 2021 13:45:08 GMT
It would be good if all those taunting Tony (yep, I'm not exactly free of guilt here either) would just give it a rest and leave it to pond life such as Steve. If nothing else Tony has shown he's in it for the long term and nothing anybody can say will alter his stance. I suppose it can be difficult not to respond to an insult but all it does is feed the fire. Consider what a better place the forum is since Ross turned the tap off. The only pond life here is you [ nemesis], though I prefer to believe you’re just a mouthy fucktard looking to make yourself noticed, and get a response so you can play on that as well. Well there’s your response 🙂 Why not try improve on the low regard in which you're held by nemesis, and everyone else who's ever had the displeasure of knowing or communicating with you, . . by responding honestly and directly to my earlier post ? Here it is again : - I refer to the garbage that you [JJ] are misrepresenting as factual, as 'malicious speculation', because that's precisely what it is !
If these "other Boaters in the area" whose "input" you set so much store by do actually exist, I would appreciate being given their names, locations, and any other contact details you have.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2021 16:23:50 GMT
The only pond life here is you [ nemesis], though I prefer to believe you’re just a mouthy fucktard looking to make yourself noticed, and get a response so you can play on that as well. Well there’s your response 🙂 Why not try improve on the low regard in which you're held by nemesis, and everyone else who's ever had the displeasure of knowing or communicating with you, . . by responding honestly and directly to my earlier post ? Here it is again : - I refer to the garbage that you [JJ] are misrepresenting as factual, as 'malicious speculation', because that's precisely what it is !
If these "other Boaters in the area" whose "input" you set so much store by do actually exist, I would appreciate being given their names, locations, and any other contact details you have.Dunkley, you are a liar, you were not “living” on halcyon days at the time of its removal. No matter how many times you state you were, it still won’t be true. If you had taken crt to court for eviction, they would have provided witnesses and evidence to prove it was not your sole and only residence. Hence why you could not use the eviction laws.
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on Sept 14, 2021 9:54:33 GMT
Why not try improve on the low regard in which you're held by nemesis, and everyone else who's ever had the displeasure of knowing or communicating with you, . . by responding honestly and directly to my earlier post ? Here it is again : - I refer to the garbage that you [JJ] are misrepresenting as factual, as 'malicious speculation', because that's precisely what it is !
If these "other Boaters in the area" whose "input" you set so much store by do actually exist, I would appreciate being given their names, locations, and any other contact details you have.Dunkley, you are a liar, you were not “living” on halcyon days at the time of its removal. No matter how many times you state you were, it still won’t be true. If you had taken crt to court for eviction, they would have provided witnesses and evidence to prove it was not your sole and only residence. Hence why you could not use the eviction laws. You've been banging this drum since the middle of last March, . . starting with this rubbish:- _____________________________________________________________ Mar 15, 2021 at 12:59pm -- Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2021 at 12:59pm Just had this sent to me on farcebook. Seems the owner of halcyon days is not giving us all the facts.
“Hey steve just been reading the dunkley thread on thunderboat.
He was not on the boat when canal and river trust operatives arrived to remove it. A phone call was made to let him know. He had not lived on halcyon daze for some time and the boat we thought had been abandoned by him. He has accommodation elsewhere as far as we know which is probably why he was not using the boat. The guy is a fruit cake don’t let him wind u up.” ______________________________________________________________________
. . . then this, just over 5 hours later :- Mar 15, 2021 at 6:05pm @bedruthan said: "I did seek clarification on the info from two separate parties who have no direct connection to the issue. He was 100% not living on the boat."_________________________________________________ Now you're saying that if i had instigated a criminal prosecution, police or private, against C&RT for evicting me in contravention of the Covid-19 regulations, then C&RT - " would have provided witnesses and evidence to prove it was not your sole and only residence." You've refused, several times, to identify or to put me in contact with these supposed informants, . . and now you've introduced some more anonymous "witnesses" that you say C&RT would "provide" if necessary, . . along with some unspecified "evidence" in support. Nothing that you've stated sounds at all convincing, . . but I can believe that C&RT's dishonest lawyers would be prepared to introduce witnesses who would perjure themselves on oath, and to falsify evidence, as they have previously done. On the other hand, verifiable evidence to the effect that "Halcyon Daze" was my sole residence until the morning of 22 October 2020 IS available from a broad spectrum of sources ranging from neighbouring boat owners and long standing close friends to local government officials, . . and the people who DO actually live in the house in Rectory Place, Barton-in-Fabis, that careless use of the postcode for my mooring takes you to. Are you, or your contacts at C&RT, aware of the Royal Mail postcode anomaly that affects the NG11 0AL and NG11 0BL postcodes in Barton-in-Fabis village ? The '0AL' and the '0BL' codes are for roads leading to the river, or for properties alongside the river in Barton. Incorrect use of the two slightly different codes throws up the postal address for my mooring as a house address in a village street called Rectory Place, about half a mile away from the river, . . and we all know how gifted C&RT are when it comes to getting things such as addresses correct, . . don't we ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2021 9:59:49 GMT
Dunkley, you are a liar, you were not “living” on halcyon days at the time of its removal. No matter how many times you state you were, it still won’t be true. If you had taken crt to court for eviction, they would have provided witnesses and evidence to prove it was not your sole and only residence. Hence why you could not use the eviction laws. You've been banging this drum since the middle of last March, . . starting with this rubbish:- _____________________________________________________________ Mar 15, 2021 at 12:59pm -- Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2021 at 12:59pm Just had this sent to me on farcebook. Seems the owner of halcyon days is not giving us all the facts.
“Hey steve just been reading the dunkley thread on thunderboat.
He was not on the boat when canal and river trust operatives arrived to remove it. A phone call was made to let him know. He had not lived on halcyon daze for some time and the boat we thought had been abandoned by him. He has accommodation elsewhere as far as we know which is probably why he was not using the boat. The guy is a fruit cake don’t let him wind u up.” ______________________________________________________________________
. . . then this, just over 5 hours later :- Mar 15, 2021 at 6:05pm @bedruthan said: "I did seek clarification on the info from two separate parties who have no direct connection to the issue. He was 100% not living on the boat."_________________________________________________ Now you're saying that if i had instigated a criminal prosecution, police or private, against C&RT for evicting me in contravention of the Covid-19 regulations, then C&RT - " would have provided witnesses and evidence to prove it was not your sole and only residence." You've refused, several times, to identify or to put me in contact with these supposed informants, . . and now you've introduced some more anonymous "witnesses" that you say C&RT would "provide" if necessary, . . along with some unspecified "evidence" in support. Nothing that you've stated sounds at all convincing, . . but I can believe that C&RT's dishonest lawyers would be prepared to introduce witnesses who would perjure themselves on oath, and to falsify evidence, as they have previously done. On the other hand, verifiable evidence to the effect that "Halcyon Daze" was my sole residence until the morning of 22 October 2020 IS available from a broad spectrum of sources ranging from neighbouring boat owners and long standing close friends to local government officials. Are you, or your contacts at C&RT, aware of the Royal Mail postcode anomaly that affects the NG11 0AL and NG11 0BL postcodes in Barton-in-Fabis village ? The '0AL' and the '0BL' codes are for roads leading to the river, or for properties alongside the river in Barton. Incorrect use of the two slightly different codes throws up the postal address for my mooring as a house address in a village street called Rectory Place, about half a mile away from the river, . . and we all know how gifted C&RT are when it comes to getting things such as addresses correct, . . don't we ? 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
|
|