Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2021 10:09:13 GMT
This is what the MSM creates..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2021 10:10:00 GMT
You can take the boy out of Beduff... Close but no cigar Exhall?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2021 10:14:08 GMT
Close but no cigar Exhall? Getting warmer
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2021 10:25:08 GMT
This is what the MSM creates.. Oh now I get it. But nah, that's just an average day in Welling.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2021 10:50:05 GMT
Getting warmer Not Fosehill ...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2021 10:56:39 GMT
Getting warmer Not Fosehill ... That's right. Not. ETA although in the early days of their marriage (and before I was born) my parents lived for a time in a converted bus somewhere (don't know precisely) in Mount Pleasant.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2021 11:20:53 GMT
I often wonder, in an idle moment, if the kinks' Mr and Mrs Pleasant lived in Mount Pleasant. It would be appropriate for them to do so.
The London one one would think.
|
|
|
Post by Clinton Cool on Sept 28, 2021 12:57:43 GMT
Maybe they need to consider a "new labour". Now there's a thought. I guess they could call themselves 'New, New Labour' Hopefully the organisation will learn something from the last 'New Labour'. For example: 'no more boom and bust' does not mean spending excessively during a boom, pretending that there will never be a bust. And then, if they really love Muslims so much they should in the future desist from starting wars in Muslim countries.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2021 13:26:40 GMT
I often wonder, in an idle moment, if the kinks' Mr and Mrs Pleasant lived in Mount Pleasant. It would be appropriate for them to do so. The London one one would think. Or the da-doo ron ron one
|
|
|
Post by JohnV on Sept 28, 2021 16:27:44 GMT
Remember that the two points highlighted in the press are unlikely to be the only items on the agenda. It's funny how everyone always seems to feel his or her self to be a free-thinker. Ever since the events of 1798 it has been the main tactic of the established right wing to use ridicule as it's primary weapon, last seen used most effectively in the smear campaign against Mr Corbyn. While I think Starmer is a disaster of a party leader, nevertheless a system of governance focussed on the genuine welfare of the people it is in theory there to serve must be superior to one which consistently uses it to line its own pockets and perpetuate inequality.but in practice you end up with people like Mr B. Liar and two Jags in charge ...... two sides of the same coin
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2021 16:40:59 GMT
I don't have a particularly snappy retort to that, but Blair only made one real mistake. It was a biggie though. Also I seem to recall that the two Jags in question were not both publicly funded. And just for you, it was Brown the Clown that removed restraints governing the conduct of the stock market - restraints which were put in place following the crash of 1929. However, it probably made little difference in the end since the 'credit crunch' (how I hated that term) originated in the U.S banking system.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2021 17:15:27 GMT
Remember that the two points highlighted in the press are unlikely to be the only items on the agenda. It's funny how everyone always seems to feel his or her self to be a free-thinker. Ever since the events of 1798 it has been the main tactic of the established right wing to use ridicule as it's primary weapon, last seen used most effectively in the smear campaign against Mr Corbyn. While I think Starmer is a disaster of a party leader, nevertheless a system of governance focussed on the genuine welfare of the people it is in theory there to serve must be superior to one which consistently uses it to line its own pockets and perpetuate inequality.but in practice you end up with people like Mr B. Liar and two Jags in charge ...... two sides of the same coin I quite liked two jags. He was a bit of a character, and he was a jag man.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2021 17:18:49 GMT
By the time Labour realise that the halfwit leadership is not getting anywhere, their best chance (Andy Burnham) will have buggered off again. I’m not suggesting he’s any good, but he’s more electable than mr and Mrs dimwit.
|
|
|
Post by JohnV on Sept 28, 2021 18:24:20 GMT
but in practice you end up with people like Mr B. Liar and two Jags in charge ...... two sides of the same coin I quite liked two jags. He was a bit of a character, and he was a jag man. I didn't like him from way way back in his NUS days, a bully boy then as well
|
|
|
Post by Clinton Cool on Sept 28, 2021 18:47:53 GMT
By the time Labour realise that the halfwit leadership is not getting anywhere, their best chance (Andy Burnham) will have buggered off again. I’m not suggesting he’s any good, but he’s more electable than mr and Mrs dimwit. He probably is more electable than Starmer who frankly, is just boring. However, if you ever wanted to see a prime example of the career politician, one who jumps from pillar to post depending on where he can best get his name in the press, who has no principles other than being a success himself, Burnham is that person. I remember his first speech as major of Manchester 'we are going to end homelessness in Manchester' to raucous applause from his supporters. A few years on, homelessness having risen in Manchester his only responses were 'I make no apologies for setting high targets'. Oh, and blaming the government.
|
|