|
Post by bettina on Oct 28, 2016 22:54:01 GMT
Why would anyone think that? You've formed you opinions based on your experiences with her (LM), as has everyone else. By reading through this thread, I'd say over 2/3rd's of the posts are of the same reflection as yours. The other 1/3 had more positive interactions with her, doesn't make any of us right or wrong we just have different experiences with the same person. Well that's my opinion anyway P Thats a bit like saying i went to a party, met this bloke who went on murder 1/3 of the people at the party. Still, he didn't murder 2/3rds of them so I think he's a really nice bloke. or to put it another way, when in a position of power one is expected to behave properly all the time, not just some of the time. I really don't see how you can use that first bit as a comparison really, it's worse then trying to compare a rat to a skunk. At least they are both commonly known to be a pest. One can bite and give you some very nasty infections, the worst the other can do is make you stink. Your second point I agree with entirely, but would offer this... Since I'm not privy to the PM's you've had between yourself & LM, or the history you have with each other over the years, all I can base my opinions on are what I've seen/read on the open threads. I haven't been spending much time over there since joining here, most of the info I get from over there is what I read here tbh. Some days I log in for a look around, others I don't Other than a few days ago, when I was extremely close to getting my first warning point (they had received a complaint about me, alleging that I had threatened another member with physical violence) and spent a good portion of my day defending/explaining myself in a bunch of PM's going back & forth. And even though it was quite obvious that she believed the member who issued the complaint, she eventually seen my side of it and changed her mind, to the point of sending a apology the next morning. That went a fair way with me.
|
|
|
Post by PaulG2 on Oct 28, 2016 23:22:13 GMT
P Thats a bit like saying i went to a party, met this bloke who went on murder 1/3 of the people at the party. Still, he didn't murder 2/3rds of them so I think he's a really nice bloke. or to put it another way, when in a position of power one is expected to behave properly all the time, not just some of the time. Other than a few days ago, when I was extremely close to getting my first warning point (they had received a complaint about me, alleging that I had threatened another member with physical violence) Betty, you are such a thug! What did you do, threaten you would make someone eat too many cookies so they'd get a tummy ache?
|
|
|
Post by bettina on Oct 29, 2016 0:07:52 GMT
Other than a few days ago, when I was extremely close to getting my first warning point (they had received a complaint about me, alleging that I had threatened another member with physical violence) Betty, you are such a thug! What did you do, threaten you would make someone eat too many cookies so they'd get a tummy ache? LMAO - not quite
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Oct 29, 2016 7:35:19 GMT
P Thats a bit like saying i went to a party, met this bloke who went on murder 1/3 of the people at the party. Still, he didn't murder 2/3rds of them so I think he's a really nice bloke. or to put it another way, when in a position of power one is expected to behave properly all the time, not just some of the time. I really don't see how you can use that first bit as a comparison really, it's worse then trying to compare a rat to a skunk. At least they are both commonly known to be a pest. One can bite and give you some very nasty infections, the worst the other can do is make you stink. Your second point I agree with entirely, but would offer this... Since I'm not privy to the PM's you've had between yourself & LM, or the history you have with each other over the years, all I can base my opinions on are what I've seen/read on the open threads. I haven't been spending much time over there since joining here, most of the info I get from over there is what I read here tbh. Some days I log in for a look around, others I don't Other than a few days ago, when I was extremely close to getting my first warning point (they had received a complaint about me, alleging that I had threatened another member with physical violence) and spent a good portion of my day defending/explaining myself in a bunch of PM's going back & forth. And even though it was quite obvious that she believed the member who issued the complaint, she eventually seen my side of it and changed her mind, to the point of sending a apology the next morning. That went a fair way with me. Well I think she is a ranting bossy, rude, 2-faced cow. That is her internet persona of course. Perhaps she is all sweetness and light in real life - who knows? I certainly don't intend to find out.
|
|
|
Post by patty on Oct 29, 2016 8:02:54 GMT
She's a woman who got very stressed and het up..when women(I'll exclude myself here!) see perceived criticism against them or summit they are connected to they may take it personal and reaction is on level of a nuclear melt down and anything it the path zapped.... It happens..she probably feels bit uncomfortable now ref her rant..or maybe not..whatever..in the grand scheme whats a one woman tirade..
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Oct 29, 2016 8:11:57 GMT
She's a woman who got very stressed and het up..when women(I'll exclude myself here!) see perceived criticism against them or summit they are connected to they may take it personal and reaction is on level of a nuclear melt down and anything it the path zapped.... It happens..she probably feels bit uncomfortable now ref her rant..or maybe not..whatever..in the grand scheme whats a one woman tirade.. I've criticised her capabilities as a mod to her face, based on her aggressive and confrontational style. Several times. Her revenge for that was to make hints that I had sent abusive emails to the site staff, which she and I know is completely untrue. If it was accidental, she could have fixed it but she declined to make her meaning clear when GG pointed it out on open forum. That is inexcusable. She is a 2 faced lying cow. By contrast when I did the same to Dan he .... just banned me! But actually that is a better reaction than to try to run a whispering campaign against me. At least Dan was up front and not trying to bring my character into disrepute by lying.
|
|
|
Post by JohnV on Oct 29, 2016 8:14:48 GMT
She's a woman who got very stressed and het up..when women people (I'll exclude myself here!) see perceived criticism against them or summit they are connected to they may take it personal and reaction is on level of a nuclear melt down and anything it the path zapped.... It happens..she probably feels bit uncomfortable now ref her rant..or maybe not..whatever..in the grand scheme whats a one woman tirade..
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Oct 29, 2016 8:21:06 GMT
One good thing about Thunderboat is that it has allowed people with 'previous issues' to clear the air and make a fresh start. Wot - you mean Lady Muck is coming on HERE???!!! Be very afraid!
|
|
|
Post by junior on Oct 29, 2016 8:21:08 GMT
Is the rant still there?
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Oct 29, 2016 8:22:10 GMT
Others will correct but pretty sure it's gone along with the whole thread. But anyway not really worth reading, it was a near replica of one of teenager Perry's "SO UNFAIR" rants (the Harry Enfield character.)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2016 8:57:46 GMT
Well I think she is a ranting bossy, rude, 2-faced cow. Spot on, and I've met her.
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Oct 29, 2016 9:00:29 GMT
Yes, in the "clarification of a rule" thread.
|
|
|
Post by Bad-Bitch on Oct 29, 2016 12:41:02 GMT
well shes still a mod so nothings changed there then
|
|
|
Post by patty on Oct 29, 2016 15:21:36 GMT
She's a woman who got very stressed and het up..when women(I'll exclude myself here!) see perceived criticism against them or summit they are connected to they may take it personal and reaction is on level of a nuclear melt down and anything it the path zapped.... It happens..she probably feels bit uncomfortable now ref her rant..or maybe not..whatever..in the grand scheme whats a one woman tirade.. I've criticised her capabilities as a mod to her face, based on her aggressive and confrontational style. Several times. Her revenge for that was to make hints that I had sent abusive emails to the site staff, which she and I know is completely untrue. If it was accidental, she could have fixed it but she declined to make her meaning clear when GG pointed it out on open forum. That is inexcusable. She is a 2 faced lying cow. By contrast when I did the same to Dan he .... just banned me! But actually that is a better reaction than to try to run a whispering campaign against me. At least Dan was up front and not trying to bring my character into disrepute by lying. Women can be fairly vindictive..I had a campaign against me by one...I won't name the bitch but she tried to wreck my life. I chose path of zero contact and did not retaliate, said nothing. TBH I was quite unwell and mentally not up to firing rockets of mass destruction or other wise. She did her worst and people who believed the campaign I lost as friends...but were they friends?...they believed lies...so no not really. Many years down the line Ive moved on. Those "friends" I do not miss. Don't let one woman bitterness spoil one minute of any day...she's not with it..no-one is. People have spoken out in your defence recognising the who you are...those who are negative are unimportant, they probably didn't like your posting style anyway.
|
|
|
Post by rockdodger on Oct 30, 2016 13:48:03 GMT
I see that the CWDF site staff page has a 'last active' collumn, in which 3 staff members including LM are showing as 'private'. Does this mean they dont want anyone to know when they online on the forum, or is it something else completely innocent?
|
|