Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2022 9:35:06 GMT
What happens if you want to licence a boat but have no address to declare? This is an interesting question. Perhaps you can't in fact obtain a licence without an address. There was a time when you could walk in and buy a boat license at the BW offce in Watford. Same with the EA in Reading but I don't think its an option any more. NFA status and boats seems interesting.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Aug 29, 2022 9:42:27 GMT
You can use a homeless drop in centres adress if you are NFA for bank accounts etc. So I imagine crt would have to take a co address like other bodies do.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2022 9:46:06 GMT
I guess so. I did arrange registration for a Thames friend with no address and called myself his "agent". I then recieved an notice from district enforcement scum but as I was the agent not the owner they could not chase me for it.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Aug 29, 2022 10:24:58 GMT
Is Tony really expecting me to reply to him? No, . . of course not, . . not with anything intelligent or constructive. I did, however, expect just the reaction I've had, . . mindless lowlifes such as you are rather predictable when out of their depth. Making even bigger fools of themselves than on so many previous occasions.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Aug 29, 2022 10:34:12 GMT
Blah blah blah.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2022 10:35:32 GMT
Tony.
If you read the thread with your blinkers off you will discover what Kris was referring to with his "plausible denial" commemt.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Aug 29, 2022 10:56:59 GMT
There’s no point Andrew, your wasting your time. Ps It’s “plausible deniability,” it’s a legal term, so Tony wouldn’t understand it.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Aug 29, 2022 11:26:56 GMT
Tony. If you read the thread with your blinkers off you will discover what Kris was referring to with his "plausible denial" commemt. The wording used was - " a plausible deniability defence" - get your facts right ! Three chances to respond to perfectly reasonable posts, . . the last one raising, once again, the subject matter - the mis-application/misuse of S.43 of the 1963 Act - that if used wisely and effectively to argue against the unlawful application of C&RT's extra-statutory T&C's, would go a very long way to putting a stop to an awful lot of the C&RT nonsense once and for all, . . shithouses included, . . the managerial sort, . . and the sort the Trust are denying CC'ers the use of. Three times, the mindless little shit chose not to respond, . . then the mindless little shit was treated in just the way that sort of scum should be treated.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Aug 29, 2022 11:27:49 GMT
Blah blah blah.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Aug 29, 2022 11:32:55 GMT
Tony why haven’t you brought a case against any of the bodies you think have acted illegally towards you and “your,” property? You could start a private prosecution quite easily if you feel so strongly, but you haven’t?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2022 11:47:13 GMT
Also it has nothing to do with the "t&c" bullshit. The previous comments were referring to whether CRT is effectively a housing authority with regards to the cc ing question.
It seems plausible that they (CRT) could argue that people who have land addresses don't live on boats.
To be fair to CRT either have "no idea" or are "spies of the highest order" I know this topic because I had a boat on a residential mooring and another overataying on towpath.
The towpath boat which I did spend a lot of time on was subjected to cc1 and cc2. Letters were sent to my residential boat address suggesting I find somewhere else to live as they would be pursuing S8 at some future date. Residential mooring boat was not being rented out as I would never consider doing that.
Either clueless idiots or CRT keeping a very close eye on what people on boats are doing.
I suspect the latter.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Aug 29, 2022 12:42:15 GMT
Also it has nothing to do with the "t&c" bullshit. The previous comments were referring to whether CRT is effectively a housing authority with regards to the cc ing question. Not just “the cc ing question,” think how many moorings that they receive payments from, that people live on?They act as a landlord if they like it or not. So they definately can’t avoid their duty of care.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Aug 29, 2022 13:07:13 GMT
There’s no point Andrew, your wasting your time. Ps It’s “plausible deniability,” it’s a legal term, so Tony wouldn’t understand it. It's: you're Not sure if you understand that.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Aug 29, 2022 13:10:52 GMT
Is Highways England (or whatever they call themselves now, they seem to change their name once a year) responsible for care of motorists? Some of them sleep and eat and live in their cars. Lorry drivers certainly do. Would Highways England be considered 'a housing authority' ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2022 13:11:31 GMT
Also it has nothing to do with the "t&c" bullshit. The previous comments were referring to whether CRT is effectively a housing authority with regards to the cc ing question. Not just “the cc ing question,” think how many moorings that they receive payments from, that people live on?They act as a landlord if they like it or not. So they definately can’t avoid their duty of care. Not a wasps nest I would poke if I was still living on board. It may be legal to ban living on board altogether, now that would hurt a lot of people. 30 years ago we went out of our way to make boats look as if they weren't lived in, things like no stove smoke in daylight hours etc just in case the local council got wind of it. Would you want to go back to that?
|
|