|
Post by Mr Stabby on Feb 27, 2023 18:39:37 GMT
You are again missing the obvious truth that we don't really give a crap about your current version of events but simply would have liked to view any footage solely for purposes of amusement. Incidentally, some of us recall that it was stated you arrived on site shortly after the appearance of Garner and co., having been alerted by parties unknown. But, to use the popular idiom, whatever. I do hope that one day I'll meet you in person. He's not an eight-year-old girl, Tony.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Feb 27, 2023 18:40:48 GMT
So just for interest Tony, who are you posting all this stuff for? He's documenting legal evidence of course. Im just interested in who he imagines is reading thunderboat.
|
|
|
Post by on Feb 27, 2023 20:21:12 GMT
Maybe there are a load of invisible but Very Important people trawling through these pages.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Feb 28, 2023 10:58:13 GMT
Is there not a chance that there is film of Tony's altercation? I thought Police in public facing circumstances wore body cameras. Describing my efforts to resist the active assistance given to C&RT's bogus Bailiffs by four thick ill-trained Police officers in the unlawful/fraudulent seizure of Halcyon Daze on 22 October 2020 as an 'altercation' is misleading and inappropriate, . . to say the least. In answer to your question, however, . . yes, there was footage, and audio, of all three of my attempts to persuade the Nottinghamshire thickies to firstly check and verify the bogus Bailiff's credentials, and secondly to check and verify the true nature, power, and scope of the Court Order that C&RT's bogus Bailiffs, and 'Licence/Customer Support Supervisor', were fraudulently, and in contempt of Court, passing off as a Court issued Warrant or Writ of Control authorizing, and ordering, the seizure of the named craft. There was no Police footage, or audio, of me throwing the bogus Bailffs off my boat, . . the Police were called immediately after that by S. Garner, the C&RT Licence/Customer Support Supervisor, . . who had arrived at Barton Wharf with the Commercial Boat Services supplied boat thieving staff, and the bogus Bailiffs, expecting the boat to be unoccupied and an easy target.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Feb 28, 2023 11:00:40 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Feb 28, 2023 12:13:03 GMT
Is there not a chance that there is film of Tony's altercation? I thought Police in public facing circumstances wore body cameras. Describing my efforts to resist the active assistance given to C&RT's bogus Bailiffs by four thick ill-trained Police officers in the unlawful/fraudulent seizure of Halcyon Daze on 22 October 2020 as an 'altercation' is misleading and inappropriate, . . to say the least. In answer to your question, however, . . yes, there was footage, and audio, of all three of my attempts to persuade the Nottinghamshire thickies to firstly check and verify the bogus Bailiff's credentials, and secondly to check and verify the true nature, power, and scope of the Court Order that C&RT's bogus Bailiffs, and 'Licence/Customer Support Supervisor', were fraudulently, and in contempt of Court, passing off as a Court issued Warrant or Writ of Control authorizing, and ordering, the seizure of the named craft. There was no Police footage, or audio, of me throwing the bogus Bailffs off my boat, . . the Police were called immediately after that by S. Garner, the C&RT Licence/Customer Support Supervisor, . . who had arrived at Barton Wharf with the Commercial Boat Services supplied boat thieving staff, and the bogus Bailiffs, expecting the boat to be unoccupied and an easy target. And they were right.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Feb 28, 2023 12:57:25 GMT
Is there not a chance that there is film of Tony's altercation? I thought Police in public facing circumstances wore body cameras. Describing my efforts to resist the active assistance given to C&RT's bogus Bailiffs by four thick ill-trained Police officers in the unlawful/fraudulent seizure of Halcyon Daze on 22 October 2020 as an 'altercation' is misleading and inappropriate, . . to say the least. In answer to your question, however, . . yes, there was footage, and audio, of all three of my attempts to persuade the Nottinghamshire thickies to firstly check and verify the bogus Bailiff's credentials, and secondly to check and verify the true nature, power, and scope of the Court Order that C&RT's bogus Bailiffs, and 'Licence/Customer Support Supervisor', were fraudulently, and in contempt of Court, passing off as a Court issued Warrant or Writ of Control authorizing, and ordering, the seizure of the named craft. There was no Police footage, or audio, of me throwing the bogus Bailffs off my boat, . . the Police were called immediately after that by S. Garner, the C&RT Licence/Customer Support Supervisor, . . who had arrived at Barton Wharf with the Commercial Boat Services supplied boat thieving staff, and the bogus Bailiffs, expecting the boat to be unoccupied and an easy target. The civil wrongs and the criminal offences, committed under the noses and with the active assistance of the Police, on 22 October 2020 are broadly covered under the relevant sections and sub-sections of the following Acts :- Theft Act 1968 Torts(Interference with Goods)Act 1977 Fraud Act 2006 Tribunals, Courts, and Enforcement Act 2007
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Feb 28, 2023 13:57:31 GMT
|
|
|
Post by kris on Feb 28, 2023 16:04:55 GMT
. . . and you are missing the point that nothing I post here, or anywhere else, is directed at or for the benefit of you or any of the other mindless arseholes who debase Thunderboat with their presence. So just for interest Tony, who are you posting all this stuff for? Ive asked again in case you missed it Tony.
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Feb 28, 2023 16:52:56 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Feb 28, 2023 17:09:57 GMT
So just for interest Tony, who are you posting all this stuff for? Ive asked again in case you missed it Tony. Pointless unless you post in larger font size. Possibly underline a few bits too.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Feb 28, 2023 18:07:50 GMT
Describing my efforts to resist the active assistance given to C&RT's bogus Bailiffs by four thick ill-trained Police officers in the unlawful/fraudulent seizure of Halcyon Daze on 22 October 2020 as an 'altercation' is misleading and inappropriate, . . to say the least. In answer to your question, however, . . yes, there was footage, and audio, of all three of my attempts to persuade the Nottinghamshire thickies to firstly check and verify the bogus Bailiff's credentials, and secondly to check and verify the true nature, power, and scope of the Court Order that C&RT's bogus Bailiffs, and 'Licence/Customer Support Supervisor', were fraudulently, and in contempt of Court, passing off as a Court issued Warrant or Writ of Control authorizing, and ordering, the seizure of the named craft. There was no Police footage, or audio, of me throwing the bogus Bailffs off my boat, . . the Police were called immediately after that by S. Garner, the C&RT Licence/Customer Support Supervisor, . . who had arrived at Barton Wharf with the Commercial Boat Services supplied boat thieving staff, and the bogus Bailiffs, expecting the boat to be unoccupied and an easy target. The civil wrongs and the criminal offences, committed under the noses and with the active assistance of the Police, on 22 October 2020 are broadly covered under the relevant sections and sub-sections of the following Acts :- Theft Act 1968 Torts(Interference with Goods)Act 1977 Fraud Act 2006 Tribunals, Courts, and Enforcement Act 2007 Dealing first with the criminal offences committed under the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, . . there were three primary active offenders, . . C&RT's so-called Licence/Customer Support Supervisor, S.Garner - who misrepresented or passed himself off as an 'Enforcement Officer' authorized by the Court to act as such, . . and a couple of goons, provided by C&RT contractor Brian Clarke of Commercial Boat Services, from an outfit going under the name of Greyknight Ltd. All three claimed -falsely- to be acting on the order, and authority, of the Court under Section 63(2) of the TCE Act 2007. This false claim was conveyed initially to the four Nottinghamshire thickies - whilst at the same time lying to them and convincing them that the 19 August 2019 Court Order authorized the seizure of my boat Halcyon Daze. The same false claim as to the authority and scope of the 19 August 2019 Order was repeated with the same degree of success, by S.Garner, to the investigating officer who dealt with my fomal complaint to Nottinghamshire Police. Anyone guilty of such an offence under S.63 is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale. With regard to S.Garner, . . he, as the participant who subsequently lied to the Police under questioning is, of course, subject to being charged with the further offence of obstructing the Police in the course of their duty.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Feb 28, 2023 18:12:40 GMT
Describing my efforts to resist the active assistance given to C&RT's bogus Bailiffs by four thick ill-trained Police officers in the unlawful/fraudulent seizure of Halcyon Daze on 22 October 2020 as an 'altercation' is misleading and inappropriate, . . to say the least. In answer to your question, however, . . yes, there was footage, and audio, of all three of my attempts to persuade the Nottinghamshire thickies to firstly check and verify the bogus Bailiff's credentials, and secondly to check and verify the true nature, power, and scope of the Court Order that C&RT's bogus Bailiffs, and 'Licence/Customer Support Supervisor', were fraudulently, and in contempt of Court, passing off as a Court issued Warrant or Writ of Control authorizing, and ordering, the seizure of the named craft. There was no Police footage, or audio, of me throwing the bogus Bailffs off my boat, . . the Police were called immediately after that by S. Garner, the C&RT Licence/Customer Support Supervisor, . . who had arrived at Barton Wharf with the Commercial Boat Services supplied boat thieving staff, and the bogus Bailiffs, expecting the boat to be unoccupied and an easy target. The civil wrongs and the criminal offences, committed under the noses and with the active assistance of the Police, on 22 October 2020 are broadly covered under the relevant sections and sub-sections of the following Acts :- Theft Act 1968 Torts(Interference with Goods)Act 1977 Fraud Act 2006 Tribunals, Courts, and Enforcement Act 2007 1). Your boat was lawfully seized in accordance with a Court Order issued at Nottingham County Court. 2) You aren't going to be getting it back. 3) Nobody involved with its removal has committed any criminal offence, neither are they ever going to be charged with any criminal offence. 4) The sooner you get your head around this, the sooner you will be able to move on with your sad and inadequate life.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Feb 28, 2023 18:16:31 GMT
The civil wrongs and the criminal offences, committed under the noses and with the active assistance of the Police, on 22 October 2020 are broadly covered under the relevant sections and sub-sections of the following Acts :- Theft Act 1968 Torts(Interference with Goods)Act 1977 Fraud Act 2006 Tribunals, Courts, and Enforcement Act 2007 With regard to S.Garner, . . he, as the participant who subsequently lied to the Police under questioning is, of course, subject to being charged with the further offence of obstructing the Police in the course of their duty. Bwa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Bwa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! (Gasp) Bwa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Feb 28, 2023 18:32:56 GMT
Which gif do you feel is most appropriate to Tony's intransigent position? Is it this one:
|
|