|
|
Post by on Mar 1, 2023 20:56:31 GMT
The above is a bogus post. What makes you think that. You fag scrounger... 
It is all bogus. I have suddenly realised this.
Sorry you were just part of the collateral damage. Don't take it personally.
|
|
|
|
Post by on Mar 1, 2023 20:57:23 GMT
It always amazes me how many people like telling other people what they should be doing.
You mean like deliberately running one's boat aground just to irritate the navigation authority?
|
|
|
|
Post by kris on Mar 1, 2023 21:00:09 GMT
It always amazes me how many people like telling other people what they should be doing.
You mean like deliberately running one's boat aground just to irritate the navigation authority?
Yes that’s a good example. It seems to be quite a common trait amongst the human race. The plandemic seems to have just aggravated the situation. |
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Mar 1, 2023 21:01:11 GMT
He makes a good point though. If nobody responded he'd get bored. Eventually.
|
|
|
|
Post by on Mar 1, 2023 21:02:45 GMT
People don't tend to tell me to do many things at all. They usually just say do one.
|
|
|
|
Post by on Mar 1, 2023 21:04:12 GMT
I wonder about the laws around precedents when it comes to all this CRT boat lifting lark.
Maybe they actually are allowed to do it because it has been going on so long without proper challenges.
|
|
|
|
Post by fi on Mar 1, 2023 21:14:16 GMT
I wonder about the laws around precedents when it comes to all this CRT boat lifting lark. Maybe they actually are allowed to do it because it has been going on so long without proper challenges. Stop baiting! |
|
|
|
Post by on Mar 1, 2023 21:30:07 GMT
What about the children? Just think of the children.
I know. Shocking isn't it.
The poor baby, just left in the woods to die and be found by intensive police searches.
Some people !
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Mar 1, 2023 21:32:21 GMT
I wonder about the laws around precedents when it comes to all this CRT boat lifting lark. Maybe they actually are allowed to do it because it has been going on so long without proper challenges. It's a pretty standard and long-established concept that if you have something which needs to be licensed and you decline to get a licence for it then the relevant licensing authority isn't just going to say "Oh, ok then". I would imagine that the overwhelming majority of decent, honest boaters would fully support CRT in the actions they have taken against Dunkley. |
|
|
|
Post by kris on Mar 1, 2023 22:58:55 GMT
Not quite true. Crt don’t bother if you don’t show a number or name on the boat and they can’t link it to any individual. It’s too much work for them. There’s quite a few boats like that around here. In fact I’m not sure why I bother paying a licence anymore, I’m just to honest I suppose. Tony got under garners skin too much and then all the nonsense with selby Micheal was the final straw. I wouldn’t be surprised if it was the last boat garner stole before he retired.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Mar 2, 2023 8:42:48 GMT
Not quite true. Crt don’t bother if you don’t show a number or name on the boat and they can’t link it to any individual. It’s too much work for them. There’s quite a few boats like that around here. In fact I’m not sure why I bother paying a licence anymore, I’m just to honest I suppose. Tony got under garners skin too much and then all the nonsense with selby Micheal was the final straw. I wouldn’t be surprised if it was the last boat garner stole before he retired. . . . meaning ? |
|
|
|
Post by kris on Mar 2, 2023 8:53:08 GMT
Not quite true. Crt don’t bother if you don’t show a number or name on the boat and they can’t link it to any individual. It’s too much work for them. There’s quite a few boats like that around here. In fact I’m not sure why I bother paying a licence anymore, I’m just to honest I suppose. Tony got under garners skin too much and then all the nonsense with selby Micheal was the final straw. I wouldn’t be surprised if it was the last boat garner stole before he retired. . . . meaning ? You know very well what it means. |
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Mar 2, 2023 9:25:51 GMT
You know very well what it means. No, . . I don't. You need to explain, . . in a post, . . so I can get a screenshot of it. |
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Mar 2, 2023 10:50:48 GMT
You know very well what it means. No, . . I don't. You need to explain, . . in a post, . . so I can get a screenshot of it. Please allow me to help. Kris is referring to you deliberately untying Selby Michael and setting it adrift in order to cause damage to other boats and waterways structures and then pretending that CRT had done it. |
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Mar 2, 2023 10:59:49 GMT
[Edited/expanded] What a remarkable coincidence ! Vince (Shit-for-Brains) Coventon is fooled, along with all the rest of Thunderboat's other mental cripples, by the very same wording that C&RT's crooked lawyers and bogus Bailiffs rely on to fool targeted boatowners, . . and to con thick inadequately trained Police officers into actively assisting them in unlawful boat seizures. The wording in question is :- " If you do not obey Paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Order then you may be held in contempt of court and imprisoned or fined, or your assets may be seized." - and is to be found on every one of the flawed, ultra vires, and therefore voidable Court Orders that C&RT dishonestly obtain under Part 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules That same warning, in the same or very similar form of words, appears on many of the numerous different types of County Court Orders, . . and invariably appears on the Orders for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief that are obtained by the C&RT for the sole purpose of using those Orders to knowingly in contempt of Court, fraudulently, and unlawfully seize and subsequently dispose of the Defendant's boat. The 'seizure' of a Defendant's assets is in fact a sanction reserved for the Court alone to impose, in the event of the Defendant failing to comply with the terms of an Order, . . it is NOT, under any circumstances, a sanction that is available to a successful Claimant - in these cases, the C&RT - to impose themselves as they see fit. In the event of non-compliance with paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Order(s) on the part of the Defendant, the correct and only lawful procedure is for the Claimant (C&RT) to apply to the Court asking for the Court to enforce the Order together with whatever form of sanction (imprisonment, fine, or seizure of assets) it deems fit to impose. C&RT's sole reason for obtaining these Court Orders is not as told in the hypocritical dishonest piffle that is published on the Licensing/Enforcement pages of its website -- < canalrivertrust.org.uk/the-publication-scheme/governance/legal-documents/court-action-to-remove-boats-from-our-waterways > -- but is simply for the purpose of obtaining a piece of paper, complete with Court Seal, and the magic words - " If you do not obey Paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Order then you may be held in contempt of court and imprisoned or fined, or your assets may be seized." - printed one side of it. These pieces of paper - C&RT's much vaunted 'Court Orders' - are then fraudulently, in contempt of Court and due process, misrepresented to both the Police and the unfortunate targeted boatowner to facilitate what is in truth the wholly unlawful seizure of his or her boat/home by C&RT management's squads of bogus Bailiffs, thieving contractors, and lying Customer/Licence Support Officers. |
|
