|
Post by on Mar 16, 2023 22:06:11 GMT
I know. Nor is threatening to kill yourself.
|
|
|
Post by on Mar 16, 2023 22:09:53 GMT
Get the wrecks off the cut at huge cost to the CRT then tell the idiot to fuck off.
Isn't it.
Any other options here?
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Mar 16, 2023 22:44:24 GMT
I'd say it's the option that's going to happen.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Mar 16, 2023 22:57:44 GMT
News paper article - speaks of an " Eviction Order" obtained by C&RT :- www.gazetteandherald.co.uk/news/23388946.bradford-avon-boater-will-set-fire-boat-armed-garden-fork/"What is a 'houseboat' ?
A 'houseboat' is what most people - including the people at the Government's Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy - would call a boat that's used for residential purposes in addition to sometimes being used for cruising, . . and it's also what the professional liars at C&RT dishonestly call a self-propelled canal or river pleasure craft, if it happens to have been licensed under the CC'ing clause (S.17, subsection 3/c/ii) of the 1995 BW Act, . . and if the Trust's corrupt management have targeted the boat and its owner to be subjected to one of their specialist frauds.
The fraud is initiated by C&RT's so-called Legal & Governance Services by way of a known (to the C&RT) to be inappropriate and dishonest application to the Courts, under Part 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules, for an Order for what is technically called Declaratory and Injunctive Relief. These Court Orders are applied for under the known (to the C&RT) false pretence of needing to to apply to and to gain the authority and blessing of the Courts to enforce the statutory powers of boat removal already available to the Trust under Sections 8 and 13 (respectively) of the British Waterways Acts of 1983 and 1971 (respectively).
Having obtained such an Order, the C&RT then use it to defraud targeted CC'ers out of their boats by employing bogus Bailiffs impersonating genuine officers of the Court - a serious criminal offence - to forcibly and unlawfully disposess selected boatowners of their homes and property. These bogus Bailiffs, working for and supplied to the C&RT by a crook called Brian Clarke of Commercial Boat Services of Chester, are deployed to lie to and convince both the boat owner and the Police that they have what amounts to a Writ or Warrant of Control that entitles and authorizes them to seize and take possession of the boat named on the Court Order. Once separated from its rightful owner, the boat is spirited away and disposed of, illegally, on behalf of the C&RT, and ultimately on the instructions of its Company Secretary, Tom Deards, head of what should and would be more appropriately called the Trust's 'Illegal & Connivance Services'.
On the other side of the 'houseboat' coin, however, . . when the professional liars at C&RT are talking to the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, the Government department that decides on the question of eligibility for the £400 EBSS fuel payment in respect of boats licensed under the CC'ing clause (S.17, subsection 3/c/ii) of the 1995 Act, . . it turns out that the boats that are 'houseboats' when it suits C&RT and its dishonest lawyers and management for them to be, aren't really 'houseboats' at all, . . or at least NOT when the Government's Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy tells the Trust's professional liars that 'houseboats' on its waters ARE ELIGIBLE for the £400 EBSS fuel payments. Now, . . . why could that be, I wonder ?"___________________________________________________________________ Would anyone, . . that's anyone with the wit to understand the above (first three) paragraphs, . . care to to comment on the supposed " Eviction Order" (the one that was invented by the C&RT and used to embroider the newspaper article), . . and then to go on and explain how they think such a (Court) Order was supposedly obtained by way of a County Court Claim against George Ward for 'Declaratory and Injuntive Relief' -- a Claim which was successful and resulted in an Injunction, enforcible ONLY by the Court that made the Order, and a Declaration that the C&RT is entitled to do no more that to remove the boats in question " pursuant to its statutory powers" ? As I've explained on many previous occasions, the (Declaratory and Injunctive Relief) Court Orders that C&RT mislead the Courts into making ARE NOT seizure or eviction powers, and therefore DO NOT authorize or empower C&RT, or its bogus Bailiffs and crooked contractors, to 'seize' anything or to evict anyone from anything, . . be it boat, home or C&RT controlled inland waterway.
|
|
|
Post by thebfg on Mar 17, 2023 8:15:56 GMT
The eviction order is what George or his "team" used to describe it to the press.
Or the press made it up.
CrT haven't replied for the article so it didn't come from them.
Their reply to the previous article contained no such phrase.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Mar 17, 2023 9:31:51 GMT
The eviction order is what George or his "team" used to describe it to the press. Or the press made it up. CrT haven't replied for the article so it dident come from them. There reply to the previous article contained no such phrase. Any excuse to repetitively post a load of anti crt old guff though eh?
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Mar 17, 2023 16:46:07 GMT
. . . . . . ( in a post on TheUnstableBar) The big question now is I don't know what Tony posted, but having found the loophole did he use it as a chance to to be nice and show what his intentions are in wanting to join or did he use to post rubbish? I dont post rubbish, . . I post factual material on subjects that I know, . . and I don't wrap my opinions up in a lot of hypocritical double talk either. Here's my response to what ianali said in the 'Ellis cruising plans' thread. I was going to say the same thing to Telemachus, but never got the chance, . . . thanks to the rapid onset of JohnV's attack of Canalworlditis :- "Stupid, and highly irresponsible, remark, . . particularly from someone speaking from his vast experience of a one off trip on the Trent, in good weather and river conditions, . . and with the benefit of good advice based on current conditions.
Anyone who thinks that any river, especially in its lower tidal reaches, is always going to be "no big deal" is a complete fool, . . and they shouldn't encourage others to be just as foolish."
|
|
|
Post by kris on Mar 17, 2023 17:01:04 GMT
So you where personally insulting. That’s why your posts where removed.
|
|
|
Post by thebfg on Mar 17, 2023 18:37:09 GMT
It's a shame, you may make some great points but they just get lost, covered by by insults.
Opening up a discussion on the matter makes it easier to see someone else's viewpoint. The insults just make people do the same in return and ignore the discussion at hand.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Mar 17, 2023 18:42:33 GMT
It's a shame, you may make some great points but they just get lost, covered by by insults. Opening up a discussion on the matter makes it easier to see someone else's viewpoint. The insults just make people do the same in return and ignore the discussion at hand. But but but... No other viewpoints are allowed!
|
|
|
Post by fi on Mar 17, 2023 18:42:38 GMT
There are a couple of other boating forums available if people wish to avoid the insults.
Just saying, like...
|
|
|
Post by kris on Mar 17, 2023 18:44:30 GMT
There are a couple of other boating forums available if people wish to avoid the insults.
Just saying, like...
Off you go then.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Mar 17, 2023 18:47:37 GMT
There are a couple of other boating forums available if people wish to avoid the insults.
Just saying, like...
Tony confirmed why he can't be a member of TUB. What other fora can he join that would put up with him? If he hadn't been arsey with a sneaky post he might have had a chance of being allowed in. How long could he have kept it up though? So much expertise wasted.
|
|
|
Post by fi on Mar 17, 2023 18:49:21 GMT
There are a couple of other boating forums available if people wish to avoid the insults.
Just saying, like...
Tony confirmed why he can't be a member of TUB. What other fora can he join that would put up with him? If he hadn't been arsey with a sneaky post he might have had a chance of being allowed in. How long could he have kept it up though? So much expertise wasted. My post wasn't aimed at Tony, I think he enjoys the insults.
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Mar 17, 2023 19:12:01 GMT
It's a shame, you may make some great points but they just get lost, covered by by insults. Opening up a discussion on the matter makes it easier to see someone else's viewpoint. The insults just make people do the same in return and ignore the discussion at hand. Tony doesn't make 'great points'; he makes statements designed to inform the reader that Tony knows more about everything than anybody who reads his shit and, most frequently, that everyone else is stupid. This includes you. Isn't six years of this tripe enough to convince you that Tony is an unbearable prick?
|
|