|
Post by Mr Stabby on Apr 21, 2023 21:34:03 GMT
So whats the criteria for being a vulnerable person in a vulnerable position? Was George vulnerable 10 years ago when this standoff started? Freeloading, chancing twat is my opinion of him, not dissimilar to Dunkley Apparently his has a registered disability. He's blind in one eye following an workplace incident where a battery blew up in his face, as I recall.
|
|
|
Post by Murgatroyd on Apr 21, 2023 22:06:31 GMT
G has also has a disability. He's a nasty cunt.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Apr 22, 2023 4:11:12 GMT
As mentioned elsewhere all that is likely to happen is the police will be authorised to eject the person from the boat then the boat will be removed. Haven't thought any of this through at all, . . have you, Mr Nutty Nobody. Who do you imagine will be 'authorising' the Police to 'eject' George Ward from a privately owned boat of which he is the undisputed owner ? There is no question that this man is in contempt of Court through his non-compliance with paragrahs 2) and 3), the Injunction part of the (Court) Order for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief obtained by C&RT Ltd on 23 January 2023. Do you imagine, as does your like-minded garbage spouting friend, Shit-for-Brains Coventon, that the Court will be following the course of events at Bradford-on-Avon, . . and that by some sort of automatic process it will be instructing the Police to go and drag George Ward off his boat and bring him before the Court to purge his contempt and be punished accordingly ? C&RT Ltd's wishful intentions to see George Ward unlawfully evicted from the boat he lives on were thwarted last Wednesday by the appropriate and wholly correct actions of the Police in refusing to do C&RT Ltd's unlawful dirty work for them. If C&RT Ltd's Matthew Aymes now wants to demonstrate that there is any truth in his statement claiming that all of these C&RT Ltd boat seizures and evictions are properly conducted executions of specific actions ordered by the Court, then he's going to have to get his equally dishonest colleague, Solicitor-Advocate Lucy Barry, to go back to the Court that made the 23 January 2023 Order and persuade it to impose whatever sanctions it sees fit on the contemptuous George Ward. Problem with that from C&RT Ltd's standpoint, of course, is that Lucy Barry will also have to explain to the Court, and excuse, her employer's own in contempt of Court actions last Wednesday in deploying its redesignated bogus Bailiffs - they're now called "contracted security operatives" - in a blatant move to contemptuously assume the powers the Court by way of an attempted imposition of their own of the non-compliance sanctions that are in fact the sole preserve of the Court to impose - ie, the seizure of assets.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Apr 22, 2023 6:40:58 GMT
As mentioned elsewhere all that is likely to happen is the police will be authorised to eject the person from the boat then the boat will be removed. Shit-for-Brains Coventon "I've got some sweeties in my pocket, little girl"
Tony Dunkley/ A.K. Dunkley, convicted thief and paedophile, marine engineer (unqualified) Nottinghamshire.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Apr 22, 2023 6:57:07 GMT
You forgot bankrupt.
|
|
|
Post by on Apr 22, 2023 7:27:09 GMT
Snipped for brevity. We'll have to see what happens. Presumably you think nothing will happen. I find that unlikely but you may be right. It is slightly difficult to take you seriously when you have been through similar and lost your boat.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Apr 22, 2023 7:41:06 GMT
Snipped for brevity. We'll have to see what happens. Presumably you think nothing will happen. I find that unlikely but you may be right. It is slightly difficult to take you seriously when you have been through similar and lost your boat. If The Law has ordered that the boat shall be removed from the waterway, then one way or another it will be. One of the most basic principles of Law is that compliance is not optional. Another is that no matter how slowly the wheels of justice turn, they continue to turn. It's taken 12 years to get this far, another week or two makes no difference to the authorities.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Apr 22, 2023 7:57:06 GMT
So whats the criteria for being a vulnerable person in a vulnerable position? Was George vulnerable 10 years ago when this standoff started? Freeloading, chancing twat is my opinion of him, not dissimilar to Dunkley If you don’t have access to the Internet you can be considered vulnerable. Because it’s needed to access so many of the services now a days. Sorry it’s obvious you don’t know what your talking about.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2023 8:06:58 GMT
Snipped for brevity. We'll have to see what happens. Presumably you think nothing will happen. I find that unlikely but you may be right. It is slightly difficult to take you seriously when you have been through similar and lost your boat. If The Law has ordered that the boat shall be removed from the waterway, then one way or another it will be. One of the most basic principles of Law is that compliance is not optional. Another is that no matter how slowly the wheels of justice turn, they continue to turn. It's taken 12 years to get this far, another week or two makes no difference to the authorities. In what context can the boat be removed using the present order issued on the 23rd January? If you cannot define this, it would probably be better if you took your own advice of "let's wait and see". Just parping on with the same old shit is no better than dunkley, except most of the shit your coming up with is pure shit. It's obvious you have no grasp on the complexity of such orders, so do us all a favour and stop pretending you do.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2023 8:13:10 GMT
Snipped for brevity. We'll have to see what happens. Presumably you think nothing will happen. I find that unlikely but you may be right. It is slightly difficult to take you seriously when you have been through similar and lost your boat. I hate to say this, but i find it easier to take dunkley seriously, than I do you. Your airhead ramblings are both puny and senseless, even the entertainment factor of said ramblings has gone.
|
|
|
Post by on Apr 22, 2023 8:38:42 GMT
I'm not here to be taken seriously so don't worry about it.
|
|
|
Post by on Apr 22, 2023 8:59:49 GMT
Rather than just being annoying do you have a prediction of how this situation may resolve itself? It is fairly pointless getting into personal discussions about individual posters. The subject is interesting. This is an unmoderated forum so no holds are barred. This means that people can just post what they like and they frequently do.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2023 9:00:08 GMT
Rather than just being annoying do you have a prediction of how this situation may resolve itself? It is fairly pointless getting into personal discussions about individual posters. The subject is interesting. This is an unmoderated forum so no holds are barred so people can just post what they like and they frequently do. Oh the irony.
|
|
|
Post by on Apr 22, 2023 9:02:21 GMT
What do you think might or should happen with this situation of the geyser on the boat in Bradford on Avon?
You know a lot about these things so you must have an opinion.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Apr 22, 2023 9:03:08 GMT
I thought you where on holiday Steve?
|
|