|
Post by emma on May 1, 2016 7:16:37 GMT
I have to confess to a certain perverse interest. There are no fuckwits in my life, I don't work in a factory or a pub so, rather like reading a discarded Faily Mail on the train, I read CWDF for the frisson of watching knuckle-draggers at play.
For this I welcome this forum as a place to hold them up to ridicule.
so my latest game, and I do hope you chaps, don't mind me amusing myself like this, or even if you do, is a rogues gallery of those who particularly catch my eye.
First up is Mr Angry, Graham Davis, proudly not a boat owner, so far to the right he almost falls off the bench, ever willing to pick a fight and with a few, like onion bargee, he's always one of the first in the fray.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2016 9:14:10 GMT
The problem for me is the number I deem fit and eligible for the category. There are a fair number. I flinch at the Payne incurred by naming them. Mayall of them ever suffer from Rabies rants, or The need for plumbers magic?
TBC
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2016 9:32:20 GMT
I have to confess to a certain perverse interest. There are no fuckwits in my life, I don't work in a factory or a pub so, rather like reading a discarded Faily Mail on the train, I read CWDF for the frisson of watching knuckle-draggers at play. For this I welcome this forum as a place to hold them up to ridicule. so my latest game, and I do hope you chaps, don't mind me amusing myself like this, or even if you do, is a rogues gallery of those who particularly catch my eye. First up is Mr Angry, Graham Davis, proudly not a boat owner, so far to the right he almost falls off the bench, ever willing to pick a fight and with a few, like onion bargee, he's always one of the first in the fray. You offer nothing new in your posts and as for fuckwits in your life ?I suspect you probably inhabit that role quite adequately yourself. I and I suspect a lot more contributors on here have absolutely no interest in your games and suspect your motives are simply to destroy the forum. We all have opinions of the members of CWDF you mention,but again so what ?
|
|
|
Post by emma on May 1, 2016 9:35:49 GMT
why thank you CDS for stepping up to the mark and providing a prime example. Apparently purely for my amusement. To paraphrase the honourable member, are you creaming for me? LOL.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2016 9:36:27 GMT
I have to confess to a certain perverse interest. There are no fuckwits in my life, I don't work in a factory or a pub so, rather like reading a discarded Faily Mail on the train, I read CWDF for the frisson of watching knuckle-draggers at play. For this I welcome this forum as a place to hold them up to ridicule. so my latest game, and I do hope you chaps, don't mind me amusing myself like this, or even if you do, is a rogues gallery of those who particularly catch my eye. First up is Mr Angry, Graham Davis, proudly not a boat owner, so far to the right he almost falls off the bench, ever willing to pick a fight and with a few, like onion bargee, he's always one of the first in the fray. You offer nothing new in your posts and as for fuckwits in your life ?I suspect you probably inhabit that role quite adequately yourself. I and I suspect a lot more contributors on here have absolutely no interest in your games and suspect your motives are simply to destroy the forum. We all have opinions of the members of CWDF you mention,but again so what ? Its no worse than some from the other channel who use the fb group to do similar
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2016 9:46:12 GMT
You offer nothing new in your posts and as for fuckwits in your life ?I suspect you probably inhabit that role quite adequately yourself. I and I suspect a lot more contributors on here have absolutely no interest in your games and suspect your motives are simply to destroy the forum. We all have opinions of the members of CWDF you mention,but again so what ? Its no worse than some from the other channel who use the fb group to do similar I think Delta9 sooner or later will have a decision to make,its ok having little censorship and its an ideal we all subscribe to,but is there any value to constant retrospective attacks on CWDF,it is changing from a cathartic process to a raison d,être for the usual collection of Loony Tunes. To say that I don't have to read them is disingenuous as well because human nature is such that you want to view a forum in its entirety especially one that we all subscribed to name by name when Delta9 asked for expressions of interest back in the day.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2016 9:48:45 GMT
why thank you CDS for stepping up to the mark and providing a prime example. Apparently purely for my amusement. To paraphrase the honourable member, are you creaming for me? LOL. I would rather throw a gallon of Petrol over you followed by a Match.You obviously don't know me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2016 9:56:10 GMT
Its no worse than some from the other channel who use the fb group to do similar I think Delta9 sooner or later will have a decision to make,its ok having little censorship and its an ideal we all subscribe to,but is there any value to constant retrospective attacks on CWDF,it is changing from a cathartic process to a raison d,être for the usual collection of Loony Tunes. To say that I don't have to read them is disingenuous as well because human nature is such that you want to view a forum in its entirety especially one that we all subscribed to name by name when Delta9 asked for expressions of interest back in the day. This forum is letting people respond, or let steam off, to some of the nonsense we read on CWF. After all it seems that we can get censored over there for trying to offer up an alternative opinion (which is what politics is all about!). At the same time, I think it would be a shame to see Delta shut this forum down because of slanderous posts. So I guess, everything in moderation and try not to feed fires.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2016 10:00:54 GMT
Its no worse than some from the other channel who use the fb group to do similar I think Delta9 sooner or later will have a decision to make,its ok having little censorship and its an ideal we all subscribe to,but is there any value to constant retrospective attacks on CWDF,it is changing from a cathartic process to a raison d,être for the usual collection of Loony Tunes. To say that I don't have to read them is disingenuous as well because human nature is such that you want to view a forum in its entirety especially one that we all subscribed to name by name when Delta9 asked for expressions of interest back in the day. I am often attacked for what I say, and how I say it. (i call it straight talking). I appreciate others doing the same, and I appreciate their right to do so. If someone has something to say, the right to speak it is paramount. If nothing else, it gives a picture of who they are. If you stop people from voicing their opinions and beliefs, your in my view attempting to wrap yourself in cotton wool. I don't even have a problem with you doing that, but please don't attempt to wrap me in it. I can make my own mind up.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2016 10:10:17 GMT
I think Delta9 sooner or later will have a decision to make,its ok having little censorship and its an ideal we all subscribe to,but is there any value to constant retrospective attacks on CWDF,it is changing from a cathartic process to a raison d,être for the usual collection of Loony Tunes. To say that I don't have to read them is disingenuous as well because human nature is such that you want to view a forum in its entirety especially one that we all subscribed to name by name when Delta9 asked for expressions of interest back in the day. This forum is letting people respond, or let steam off, to some of the nonsense we read on CWF. After all it seems that we can get censored over there for trying to offer up an alternative opinion (which is what politics is all about!). At the same time, I think it would be a shame to see Delta shut this forum down because of slanderous posts. So I guess, everything in moderation and try not to feed fires. You and I come from the same place on this alongside a few others.Its that difference between cathartic and raison d,etre. All week long some of us concentrate on giving the site some content by starting threads and contributing to them on the very subjects we couldn't discuss elsewhere and to see us being continually dragged back there is both hard to take and understand. We become the disgruntled ex CWDF Forum rather than forging ahead building up something fresh and new where all are both equal and accommodated.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2016 10:18:56 GMT
This forum is letting people respond, or let steam off, to some of the nonsense we read on CWF. After all it seems that we can get censored over there for trying to offer up an alternative opinion (which is what politics is all about!). At the same time, I think it would be a shame to see Delta shut this forum down because of slanderous posts. So I guess, everything in moderation and try not to feed fires. You and I come from the same place on this alongside a few others.Its that difference between cathartic and raison d,etre. All week long some of us concentrate on giving the site some content by starting threads and contributing to them on the very subjects we couldn't discuss elsewhere and to see us being continually dragged back there is both hard to take and understand. We become the disgruntled ex CWDF Forum rather than forging ahead building up something fresh and new where all are both equal and accommodated. Emotion and logic are equally important. The trouble is we miss the body langauge which go with it on a forum.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2016 10:22:04 GMT
I think Delta9 sooner or later will have a decision to make,its ok having little censorship and its an ideal we all subscribe to,but is there any value to constant retrospective attacks on CWDF,it is changing from a cathartic process to a raison d,être for the usual collection of Loony Tunes. To say that I don't have to read them is disingenuous as well because human nature is such that you want to view a forum in its entirety especially one that we all subscribed to name by name when Delta9 asked for expressions of interest back in the day. I am often attacked for what I say, and how I say it. (i call it straight talking). I appreciate others doing the same, and I appreciate their right to do so. If someone has something to say, the right to speak it is paramount. If nothing else, it gives a picture of who they are. If you stop people from voicing their opinions and beliefs, your in my view attempting to wrap yourself in cotton wool. I don't even have a problem with you doing that, but please don't attempt to wrap me in it. I can make my own mind up. Its not straight talking is it and what picture does Tossers of CWDF give of what we are. There is no opinion or belief attached to any of it only an attack on another Forum which once you hear it once becomes an irrelevance.What do we wake up to tomorrow ? " Graham Davis Shags Sheep "how does that rate as an opinion or a belief ? it doesn't. Noone is attempting to wrap anyone in cotton wool,we want a free for all but that doesn't mean denigrating each other by headlining topics in an incendiary way.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2016 10:24:04 GMT
This forum is letting people respond, or let steam off, to some of the nonsense we read on CWF. After all it seems that we can get censored over there for trying to offer up an alternative opinion (which is what politics is all about!). At the same time, I think it would be a shame to see Delta shut this forum down because of slanderous posts. So I guess, everything in moderation and try not to feed fires. You and I come from the same place on this alongside a few others.Its that difference between cathartic and raison d,etre. All week long some of us concentrate on giving the site some content by starting threads and contributing to them on the very subjects we couldn't discuss elsewhere and to see us being continually dragged back there is both hard to take and understand. We become the disgruntled ex CWDF Forum rather than forging ahead building up something fresh and new where all are both equal and accommodated. (coughs) ""I would rather throw a gallon of Petrol over you followed by a Match.You obviously don't know me"". Not the wisest of replies in the context of what you are attempting to promote.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on May 1, 2016 10:24:52 GMT
" Graham Davis Shags Sheep "how does that rate as an opinion or a belief ? it doesn't. Just a generic joke about Welsh people I think you'll find.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2016 10:25:06 GMT
I see the elusive Emma has departed having done her good deed of posting more anti CWDF rubbish.I question the motive behind that.
|
|