Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2018 10:22:44 GMT
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46416134Diane Abbott once again proving she is detached from all sense of reality. A neat response from this Twitter user. Never had that phrase been more apt or accurately use
|
|
|
Post by bargemast on Dec 2, 2018 10:50:14 GMT
All very nice and even true, but I would have loved to see what her suggestion for a less dangerous alternative would be.
For the time being it does like a good solution, as now the basterds know what sort of risk they're taking when they use a moped or scooter for their practices.
Peter.
ps, I love the wise words of the woman in the video, they really fit like a glove here.
|
|
|
Post by Clinton Cool on Dec 2, 2018 10:55:22 GMT
I'm surprised Ms Abbott is bothered, it's normally white folk on mopeds isn't it?
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Dec 2, 2018 11:10:35 GMT
You called?
"Normally, when the Abbottopotamus is on TV, I have to press the mute button. There’s only so much stupid I can handle. For some reason though, I watched her being interviewed on TV by that other cunt, Piers Morgan. I find it truly soul destroying that there are people in this country, Corbyn supporters, but still people (just) , who consider this bulbous cretin, this enigma of evolution, this affront to the human race, to be a fit and proper person to be the Home Secretary in a Labour government. I wouldn’t trust the Queen of Retards to knock on a door, never mind be the person in charge of national security.
Having watched her dodge a simple question SIX times, it baffles me how she manages to walk upright. How the fuck can someone as staggeringly thick as this biological balloon put even one word together, never mind a whole sentence. And she has the nerve to claim that people hate her because WE are racist? No, Diane, we hate you because you’re an arrogant, self-important moron, who has an IQ so low, even a single celled organism would look at you and say, “fuck me, what a thick cunt SHE is”. This wasn’t a train wreck interview. It wasn’t a car crash interview. It was the interview equivalent of the impact of the meteor that hit Earth 65 million years ago and wiped out the dinosaurs. Those motherfuckers got lucky, they didn’t have to endure this slow witted waste of a sperm and an egg. How can someone as devoid of intellect as her be considered human? Even the fleas on a baboon’s arse are more intelligent than her.
What’s even more staggering, is that there are several thousand people even more stupid than she is. And by sheer coincidence, they all live in the same constituency, because the dumb cunts actually voted for her to represent them in Parliament. If ever there was proof that democracy died a horrible death about two centuries ago, the Abbottopotamus is it. And considering the low quality of our current crop of politicians, that takes some doing. She’s lucky that breathing is something that doesn’t require conscious thought, she’d be well and truly fucked otherwise. On the bright side though, we’d no longer have to endure the idiocy of Diane the Dipshit."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2018 11:17:34 GMT
If they are into direct action and injury is acceptable then are scooter owners allowed to booby trap their vehicles? I'm sure given a bit of imagination it would be easy enough to invent a small device which would snap or burn the fingers of anyone tampering with a scooter.
But that would be illegal.
Nichrome wire wrapped round a match. A new version of "hotwiring". Only activates if vehicle is started without the key.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Dec 2, 2018 11:21:35 GMT
Sign me up!
|
|
|
Post by peterboat on Dec 2, 2018 11:59:49 GMT
I dont think if they asked the country their would be many that thought the above wasnt a good thing? I for one would like the police to use guided missiles on them!! save taking them to court
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Dec 2, 2018 12:32:03 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Andyberg on Dec 3, 2018 12:22:37 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2018 18:42:56 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Clinton Cool on Dec 4, 2018 21:57:59 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2018 22:01:16 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2018 22:15:37 GMT
Interesting they mention firearms officers. I thought they were protected to some degree and looked after. The same should apply to officers deliberately knocking people off mopeds.
It seems to be rather similar.
|
|
|
Post by Clinton Cool on Dec 4, 2018 23:07:05 GMT
You'd think that the police don't suddenly wake up and think "hey, let's have a bit of fun today, let's go and knock some chavs off their scooters". So presumably, the tactic has been thought about, there are guidelines, there has been training. On this basis, unless the individual police officer has vey clearly overstepped the mark there should be no questions raised against him or her, as to his or her continuing employment, and continuing freedom. I think what's far more likely is that someone doesn't like the police tactic, but that isn't the fault of the officer concerned, nor should it ever be, if a country wants its police force to be able to do its job.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Dec 5, 2018 8:12:42 GMT
|
|