Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2021 16:08:23 GMT
Here’s some food for thought. Some women will purposely seek to purchase sexy nightwear, for what reason? Obviously to thrill, entice their man. The irony of that is so obviously pointed.
It’s not a problem of course, until they start wearing it on the street under the guise of being fashionable.
|
|
|
Post by JohnV on Mar 13, 2021 16:09:15 GMT
Both Bedruthen and dyertribe are right ..... and both dyertribe and Bedruthen are wrong
I have seen gangs of girls and gangs of boys each as leary as the other
As has been said attracting attention if you don't want attention is a bit daft.
Frequenting places that are filled with drunks, male and female "partying" if you are risk averse is unwise.
Violence is much more prevalent now than I remember in my youth, and even then there were areas and times you avoided unless you were looking for trouble
That said, nobody minding their own business should be at risk of unwanted attention.
If you are dressed or acting in a provocative way that would indicate you wished attention you should still not be exposed to intimidation or violence and you should always be able to say "I'm not interested, bugger off" to unwanted attention.
How you achieve that balance God alone knows
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2021 16:10:07 GMT
Hey Rog, Bedruthan must think highly of you, so far you're only stupid - not fuckin stupid. (NB omission of y at the end of 'fuckin' intentional).
|
|
|
Post by JohnV on Mar 13, 2021 16:18:05 GMT
(NB omission of y at the end of 'fuckin' intentional). .......... is NB "omission of Y" the name of a a boat ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2021 16:25:57 GMT
Impossible to discuss anything with you without inviting insult ... the thoughtlessness is in blaming a victim for being attacked I would suggest. Rog You need to think before you post sometimes, because it’s virtually impossible to give you a sensible reply when you’re being stupid. Yes you're absolutely right ... a lady dressing provocatively in leggings, anorak, and woolly hat is simply INVITING attack. The temptress ... what man can possibly be expected to resist ! The world has run mad. Rog
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Mar 13, 2021 16:27:37 GMT
Yet more twaddle in the same vein. Go and take a dip in the cut. No, you’re just going into thick mode again, as you always do when you cannot think of a sensible reply. And you go into default insult mode when you can't think of a reply, blaming the messenger etc.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2021 16:29:17 GMT
Don’t be so stupid roger. Making that comparison is pretty thoughtless. Impossible to discuss anything with you without inviting insult ... the thoughtlessness is in blaming a victim for being attacked I would suggest. Rog I was not blaming the victim in any way, and neither was anyone else. The thread was moving on with opinions in general on temptation. Hardly my fault you stepped in dog shit because you weren’t looking where you were going.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2021 16:30:15 GMT
You need to think before you post sometimes, because it’s virtually impossible to give you a sensible reply when you’re being stupid. Yes you're absolutely right ... a lady dressing provocatively in leggings, anorak, and woolly hat is simply INVITING attack. The temptress ... what man can possibly be expected to resist ! The world has run mad. Rog There you go again, taking everything out of context. Twat.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2021 16:32:10 GMT
No, you’re just going into thick mode again, as you always do when you cannot think of a sensible reply. And you go into default insult mode when you can't think of a reply, blaming the messenger etc. You really can be an idiot at times. There was nothing wrong with the discussion until you and roger waded in with crap on your boots.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Mar 13, 2021 16:32:20 GMT
And here we have it; why should women cover up? Why can’t men control themselves? Why do these, often ugly, overweight, badly dressed, poorly educated and supremely bigoted men thing that any women would fancy them? Dressing scantily is a fashion choice, not “putting it on offer”. It may not be the fashion choice of all women but we should all defend their right to dress as they like without harassment from anyone. Well let me put it this way for you. I’m on the tube midsummer minding my own business. A woman gets on, sits opposite me with the flimsiest of clothing and happily displaying that she had shaved that morning, whose the bloody pervert? It ain’t me, oh, and this is something I have actually experienced. If you really want to solve something, you have to approach all of the issues. If you think it’s about fashion, I’m just thinking you’re really naive. If you don’t want harassment, dress appropriately. Simple. It's only womens bits you are imagining. Get a grip. Go to a naturist camp for therapy. I'll bet you stick with the daily express, to save on trouser seams and zips bursting.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2021 16:33:16 GMT
Well let me put it this way for you. I’m on the tube midsummer minding my own business. A woman gets on, sits opposite me with the flimsiest of clothing and happily displaying that she had shaved that morning, whose the bloody pervert? It ain’t me, oh, and this is something I have actually experienced. If you really want to solve something, you have to approach all of the issues. If you think it’s about fashion, I’m just thinking you’re really naive. If you don’t want harassment, dress appropriately. Simple. It's only womens bits you are imagining. Get a grip. Go to a naturist camp for therapy. I'll bet you stick with the daily express, to save on trouser seams and zips bursting. *yawn*
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Mar 13, 2021 16:35:19 GMT
And you go into default insult mode when you can't think of a reply, blaming the messenger etc. You really can be an idiot at times. There was nothing wrong with the discussion until you and roger waded in with crap on your boots. Oh yes dogless and I disagreeing with you and others misogynist views. Stepped in BECAUSE there was a lot wrong. Sorry to disagree with you. Not!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2021 16:38:29 GMT
You really can be an idiot at times. There was nothing wrong with the discussion until you and roger waded in with crap on your boots. Oh yes dogless and I disagreeing with you and others misogynist views. Stepped in BECAUSE there was a lot wrong. Sorry to disagree with you. Not! *yawn*
|
|
|
Post by dyertribe on Mar 13, 2021 17:09:30 GMT
And here we have it; why should women cover up? Why can’t men control themselves? Why do these, often ugly, overweight, badly dressed, poorly educated and supremely bigoted men thing that any women would fancy them? Dressing scantily is a fashion choice, not “putting it on offer”. It may not be the fashion choice of all women but we should all defend their right to dress as they like without harassment from anyone.
so you condone dangling a tasty fruit in front of every man who may admire a beautiful woman, and then pulling it away just as he is tempted to take a bite. there's a word for that - prick-teasing.
perhaps you should consider the way a man's hormones work - it's the way nature works and is part of the wonderful world of procreation ............. and of course dressing the way bedruthan describes is the result of the woman's hormones at work in much the same way.
I don’t buy the “that’s how a man’s hormones work” argument, we would still be in the Stone Age if we succumbed to that line of reasoning. We are supposed to have come a long way from there. If two people are mutually attracted to each other then fill your boots, consenting adults and all that, but the cat calling and harassment is NOT mutual and NOT consenting and those who are hard of thinking of any sex need to learn that and teach their kids. It’s only a prick tease if you have a relationship in the first place. Window-shopping, in a non pervy way is one thing, handling the goods (or remarking on the goods in a crass and offensive way) is another and is totally unacceptable. If this is not obvious to you you need counselling, and quick. It may come as a shock to you but the vast majority of women do not and will not fancy you and they do not want you to comment on their appearance or touch them in anyway at all. The ego of you and your ilk is the only breathtaking thing about you.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2021 17:22:42 GMT
so you condone dangling a tasty fruit in front of every man who may admire a beautiful woman, and then pulling it away just as he is tempted to take a bite. there's a word for that - prick-teasing.
perhaps you should consider the way a man's hormones work - it's the way nature works and is part of the wonderful world of procreation ............. and of course dressing the way bedruthan describes is the result of the woman's hormones at work in much the same way.
I don’t buy the “that’s how a man’s hormones work” argument, we would still be in the Stone Age if we succumbed to that line of reasoning. We are supposed to have come a long way from there. If two people are mutually attracted to each other then fill your boots, consenting adults and all that, but the cat calling and harassment is NOT mutual and NOT consenting and those who are hard of thinking of any sex need to learn that and teach their kids. It’s only a prick tease if you have a relationship in the first place. Window-shopping, in a non pervy way is one thing, handling the goods (or remarking on the goods in a crass and offensive way) is another and is totally unacceptable. If this is not obvious to you you need counselling, and quick. It may come as a shock to you but the vast majority of women do not and will not fancy you and they do not want you to comment on their appearance or touch them in anyway at all. The ego of you and your ilk is the only breathtaking thing about you. That is such a naive and ignorant reply. There are situations where it is perfectly acceptable to walk around half naked, on the street is not one of them. Unless you and others start to recognise that this problem derives from both sexes, we will never see change. I don’t set out in the morning to look at half naked women, but it seems there are women who set out each morning to make sure I do. I suppose they get a buzz out of it? I don’t know, but it’s bloody weird.
|
|