|
Post by metanoia on Apr 25, 2024 7:37:19 GMT
I'd go for some sort of home made mousse-the dead simple kind using jelly,fruit & condensed milk.They always turn out yummy. I always thought that was my Mum's own invention🤫! (We used evaporated milk, which I still like poured over steaming hot fruit crumble.)
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Apr 25, 2024 7:43:32 GMT
I'd go for some sort of home made mousse-the dead simple kind using jelly,fruit & condensed milk.They always turn out yummy. I always thought that was my Mum's own invention🤫! (We used evaporated milk, which I still like poured over steaming hot fruit crumble.) I prefer evap to condensed , it's a good price at Lidl.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Apr 25, 2024 11:47:03 GMT
Anyone remember this ?
It's a letter from a law firm, Blake Morgan, acting for C&RT, . . and it was sent with the express purpose and in the hope of deterring me from publishing details of how C&RT's lawyers intentionally mislead the Courts, . . of their preparedness to exhibit false evidence at hearing, . . and of their preparedness to instigate or facilitate the falsification of Court papers and documentation : --
Mr A.K.Dunkley 11 January 2021
Dear Sir
Our client: Canal & River Trust
We are instructed by Canal & River Trust ("the Trust") which is, as you are aware, a charity and statutory authority with responsibility for over 2000 miles of inland canals and waterways in England and Wales and takes reputational issues very seriously.
It has come to their attention that the Website Thunderboat, operated through ProBoards contains a chat thread -- General Boating Cart the only charity that works to make people homeless -- (https://thunderboat.boards.net/thread/6872/cart-charity-works-people-homeless?page=22) -- which contains a wide variety of comments posted by you which are untrue and misleading and are defamatory of the Trust and members of their staff.
Our client wrote to you on 1 December to express their concerns, in particular regarding posts on 18 November 2020 at 12.43am and 25 November 2020 at 8.04am.
The posts contained allegations regarding the Trust and a member of their legal team (who had previously been identified by name in earlier posts, Lucy Barry) suggesting that "doctored" evidence had been provided to the court and that the Trust paid bribes to opponents. These allegations are utterly without foundation and categorically untrue.
The posts are likely to cause serious harm to the reputation of Miss Barry and the Trust, and are intended to do so. They are defamatory of them and constitute malicious falsehood.
Subsequent postings by you during the months of November and December 2020 regarding the Trust and their personnel repeat references to "doctored" evidence, fraud, individuals retained by the Trust "posing" as bailiffs or being bogus etc. Again these claims are false and utterly without foundation and are defamatory and constitute malicious falsehood.
The Trust accept that it is legitimate for customers to express their views online in relation to genuine boating matters or customer service issues, and that there may be vigorous differences of opinion over matters of policy. What is not acceptable is to publish unsubstantiated allegations attacking individuals for no good reason as part of what appears to be a settling of scores.
Despite the Trust writing to you on 1 December setting out their concerns you have not removed the posts and indeed have made further posts with similar content and indeed posted the content of the letter of 1 December.
We take the view that is conduct is abusive and violates the ProBoards Terms of Service and in particular clauses 18 and 19 in that the posts amount to objectionable content which is defamatory, abusive and threatening and is also false and misleading. Accordingly we have been in touch with ProBoards who have reviewed the content in question and removed the offending posts.
The purpose of this letter is to advise you that our client will continue to monitor your activity on social media and in the event that further similar material is published by you they will not hesitate to take further action and this may include commencing legal proceedings against you. They reserve the right to refer to this correspondence should this prove necessary.
Yours faithfully Blake Morgan LLP __________________________________________________________________________________________________
Well, . . who does remember that letter, and all the empty threats in it, . . or why C&RT wisely thought better of instructing Blake Morgan to pursue the matter any further ?
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Apr 25, 2024 11:51:30 GMT
No, mainly due to safety reasons. You can buy it ready done now. Much less chance of things going wrong. I understand the risk but in my early years, tinned baked beans were always heated by boiling the can, we never had an explosion. I suppose it saved a bit of washing up. I believe that in the manufacturing process, baked beans are cooked in the sealed cans.
|
|
|
Post by fi on Apr 25, 2024 12:05:40 GMT
I'd go for some sort of home made mousse-the dead simple kind using jelly,fruit & condensed milk.They always turn out yummy. I always thought that was my Mum's own invention🤫! (We used evaporated milk, which I still like poured over steaming hot fruit crumble.) I always remember the time as a child when I was making fudge, mum left me to it thinking I knew what I was doing. Well I got distracted and the evapourated milk + sugar turned to burnt toffee.
2 weeks later I was finally excused trying to get her best saucepan clean...
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Apr 25, 2024 12:36:45 GMT
See posts :- thunderboat.boards.net/post/396344/thread -and- thunderboat.boards.net/post/396531/threadIt's remarkable but unsurprising how, amid the small number of internet trolls that blight this forum, the ability to read and understand plain written English appears to be an inversely proportional function of the frequency, rapidity of reponse, and seriousness of the specifically targeted on-line stalking activities that accompany, and result from, the constant close monitoring of any and all of the content I post on the Thunderboat forum. __________________________________________ Extracts from :- thunderboat.boards.net/post/396344/thread :- 5.The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (see Annex B) includes the following non-exhaustive list of examples of ‘acts or omissions associated with stalking’: ___________________________________________________ c) publishing any statement or other material - relating or purporting to relate to a person, or purporting to originate from a person, d) monitoring the use by a person of the internet, email or any other form of electronic communication, ___________________________________________________ The full text of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 is available to read at :- www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/40/contentsIf the forum members who are routinely committing either or both of the offences highlighted above wish to avoid prosecution under the provisions of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, they must refrain from adding to their existing Police file record (saved screenshots) of past offences, and cease committing any further offences of the same nature. I have no objection, for the present, if in future they cease the wilful targeted trollng of topics/threads I have initiated, and confine posted content resulting from their constant close monitoring of the content I post on this internet forum to the vast selection of pointless claptrap laden topics/threads from which they, . . and the other on-line trolls who have hi-jacked and treat this forum as if it were theirs to administer and run as their own, . . appear to gain so much mindless satisfaction.
|
|
|
Post by fi on Apr 25, 2024 13:29:24 GMT
Another slightly ironic post from Tony, telling us how to behave and threatening the 'law', whilst at the same time accusing others of trying to 'moderate' the forum...
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Apr 25, 2024 13:54:45 GMT
If Tony wants an uninterrupted forum to post on he can start his own. There are no rules about sticking to the thread title or topic, members post whatever they wish and have always carried on discussions across threads. Tony himself has taken full advantage, proffering insult and derision across the piste, now wishes to whinge, whine, cry and complain and make forum rules. Go make your own forum and have whatever rules you want Tony.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Apr 25, 2024 18:45:51 GMT
Another slightly ironic post from Tony, telling us how to behave and threatening the 'law', whilst at the same time accusing others of trying to 'moderate' the forum... Incredible and unlikely as it might have once appeared, your ability to read and understand plain simple written English lessens with every moronic post you make. This is what I actually said in the post you were too thick to properly read and understand, . . all you need to do now is find someone with enough wit to be able to read and explain it to you :- "If the forum members who are routinely committing either or both of the offences highlighted above wish to avoid prosecution under the provisions of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, they must refrain from adding to their existing Police file record (saved screenshots) of past offences, and cease committing any further offences of the same nature. I have no objection, for the present, if in future they cease the wilful targeted trollng of topics/threads I have initiated, and confine posted content resulting from their constant close monitoring of the content I post on this internet forum to the vast selection of pointless claptrap laden topics/threads from which they, . . and the other on-line trolls who have hi-jacked and treat this forum as if it were theirs to administer and run as their own, . . appear to gain so much mindless satisfaction."
|
|
|
Post by fi on Apr 25, 2024 18:50:54 GMT
Yes Tony. I'm Sorry.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Apr 25, 2024 18:51:17 GMT
If Tony wants an uninterrupted forum to post on he can start his own. There are no rules about sticking to the thread title or topic, members post whatever they wish and have always carried on discussions across threads. Tony himself has taken full advantage, proffering insult and derision across the piste, now wishes to whinge, whine, cry and complain and make forum rules. Go make your own forum and have whatever rules you want Tony. Incredible and unlikely as it might have once appeared, . . your ability to read and understand plain simple written English continues to lessen with every ridiculously moronic post you make. This is what I actually said in the post you were too thick to properly read and understand, . . now go and find someone with enough wit and patience to read and explain it to you in the simplest easiest to follow way they possibly can :- "If the forum members who are routinely committing either or both of the offences highlighted above wish to avoid prosecution under the provisions of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, they must refrain from adding to their existing Police file record (saved screenshots) of past offences, and cease committing any further offences of the same nature. I have no objection, for the present, if in future they cease the wilful targeted trollng of topics/threads I have initiated, and confine posted content resulting from their constant close monitoring of the content I post on this internet forum to the vast selection of pointless claptrap laden topics/threads from which they, . . and the other on-line trolls who have hi-jacked and treat this forum as if it were theirs to administer and run as their own, . . appear to gain so much mindless satisfaction."
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Apr 25, 2024 19:08:58 GMT
I understand the risk but in my early years, tinned baked beans were always heated by boiling the can, we never had an explosion. I suppose it saved a bit of washing up. I believe that in the manufacturing process, baked beans are cooked in the sealed cans. I've just looked it up and yes, they are cooked in the can, in a pressure cooker. Possibly this equalises internal and external pressure and prevents the cans exploding. However, I can't see any problem heating them in the can, especially if the lid is pierced before placing the can in the saucepan.
|
|
|
Post by ‎ on Apr 25, 2024 19:46:52 GMT
We've bean here before.
There must be some a-mung this group able to continue on this pleasurable diversion.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Apr 26, 2024 4:26:04 GMT
See posts :- thunderboat.boards.net/post/396344/thread -and- thunderboat.boards.net/post/396531/threadIt's remarkable but unsurprising how, amid the small number of internet trolls that blight this forum, the ability to read and understand plain written English appears to be an inversely proportional function of the frequency, rapidity of reponse, and seriousness of the specifically targeted on-line stalking activities that accompany, and result from, the constant close monitoring of any and all the content I post on the Thunderboat forum. __________________________________________ Extracts from :- thunderboat.boards.net/post/396344/thread :- 5.The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (see Annex B) includes the following non-exhaustive list of examples of ‘acts or omissions associated with stalking’: ___________________________________________________ c) publishing any statement or other material - relating or purporting to relate to a person, or purporting to originate from a person, d) monitoring the use by a person of the internet, email or any other form of electronic communication, ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Full text of the 1997 Act, available via this link :- www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/40/contentsIf the forum members who are routinely committing either or both of the offences highlighted above wish to avoid prosecution under the provisions of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, they must refrain from adding to their existing Police file record (saved screenshots) of past offences, and cease committing any further offences of the same nature. I have no objection, for the present, if in future they cease the wilful targeted trollng of topics/threads I have initiated, and confine posted content resulting from their constant close monitoring of the content I post on this internet forum to the vast selection of pointless claptrap laden topics/threads from which they, . . and the other on-line trolls who have hi-jacked and treat this forum as if it were theirs to administer and run as their own, . . appear to gain so much mindless satisfaction.
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Apr 26, 2024 5:39:12 GMT
A sadly missed product... Heinz used to sell boil in the tin sponge pud. Everyone thought the tin ought to be pierced, but it actually said in the label not to. The important bit (very important actually) was not allowing the saucepan to boil dry.
I suspect one could prove some element of the laws of thermodynamics in this way.
|
|