Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2016 21:25:42 GMT
Edited to remove content
|
|
|
Post by Phil on Oct 27, 2016 21:25:58 GMT
Looks like there is only one Thunderboat member still able to post on CWDF, and that is simply because he is an obsequious little arsewipe. Try washing your mouth out with soap. oh and you are factually incorrect yet again. There are several members on here who can still post there. Oh that's you is it, thought I might be me for a minute.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2016 21:27:16 GMT
I've done there. After 24 hours over here why would I want to go back? Anything exciting gets reported here so I'm done.
It's a private members club for a group of friends.
That's fine if you are one of the chosen. I am not one of that group.
This is home now. You've all done a great job.
Rog
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2016 21:28:19 GMT
Try washing your mouth out with soap. oh and you are factually incorrect yet again. There are several members on here who can still post there. Oh that's you is it, thought I might be me for a minute. I think IC"s been on the sherry....or is just confused.
|
|
|
Post by tonyqj on Oct 27, 2016 21:29:35 GMT
Try washing your mouth out with soap. oh and you are factually incorrect yet again. There are several members on here who can still post there. And where did I say I was referring to you? Hey, I resemble that remark...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2016 21:32:41 GMT
Well I never realised that you could actually entirely delete your own posts on here, you learn something every day.......
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2016 21:36:13 GMT
You can even delete your account via the profile section - but previous content will remain.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2016 21:40:08 GMT
I think this happened on cwdf šššš
|
|
|
Post by Albion on Oct 27, 2016 21:40:35 GMT
Looks like there is only one Thunderboat member still able to post on CWDF, and that is simply because he is an obsequious little arsewipe. No I'm not. Nor am I Roger
|
|
|
Post by tonyqj on Oct 27, 2016 21:41:36 GMT
Nor am IĀ Roger But are you sure?
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Oct 27, 2016 21:41:52 GMT
Well I emailed Dan at 5pm re. LM's hints of my serious wrongdoing. No reply, and no change to the hints. I must say it is disappointing that CWDF has to resort to dirty tricks to try to discredit me and justify their silly action. Clearly they have no honour or integrity.
If anyone would like to post that on CWDF please feel free.
|
|
|
Post by Phil on Oct 27, 2016 21:43:43 GMT
Someone has a sense of humour.
The newest member to register on CWDF is ' upacreekwithoutapaddle '
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2016 21:46:24 GMT
Well I emailed Dan at 5pm re. LM's hints of my serious wrongdoing. No reply, and no change to the hints. I must say it is disappointing that CWDF has to resort to dirty tricks to try to discredit me and justify their silly action. Clearly they have no honour or integrity. If anyone would like to post that on CWDF please feel free. Don't go taking it to heart. Dan has decided he wants his Waco moment, I'm sure you have not influenced that. I suspect it was brexit that set him off.
|
|
|
Post by Bad-Bitch on Oct 27, 2016 21:46:44 GMT
Well I emailed Dan at 5pm re. LM's hints of my serious wrongdoing. No reply, and no change to the hints. I must say it is disappointing that CWDF has to resort to dirty tricks to try to discredit me and justify their silly action. Clearly they have no honour or integrity. If anyone would like to post that on CWDF please feel free. done
|
|
|
Post by bills on Oct 27, 2016 21:55:04 GMT
From the inconsistency in moderation thread
Posted Today, 04:25 PM
Lady Muck, on 27 Oct 2016 - 4:07 PM, said:
I'm not discussing individuals. But some pms we have received from members (now ex members) were so abusive they broke the law, so why on earth would we not ban someone in that instance. Does it somehow not matter when they are in private? Any fule kno that that the worst of abuse will go on in private.
I don't think anyone would argue with that - but can you be a bit more specific about the total number of members who indulged in this behaviour and were reported to the police? Otherwise it might seem that the actions of a single individual have been used as justification for a trigger happy banning policy.
Lady Muck, on 27 Oct 2016 - 3:45 PM, said:
If you judge a situation purely on what someone tells you or what you've seen in public, you might not be getting the whole story.
You posted this response in reply to a specific question about Nick. Taken in conjunction with later post shown above, It appears that you may be inferring that Nick's private communications fall into the same category. Is that your intention?
zero response
|
|