|
Post by on Jul 12, 2023 18:47:20 GMT
He makes valid points though. The only point he makes is that he is awash with homophobia. Your head is too big.
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Jul 12, 2023 18:49:14 GMT
In these particular circumstances there is nothing wrong with it. As the police have repeatedly said. If it had been with a girl, you would have thought he was a jolly good chap for getting to see some young titty. Funnily enough the Sun didn’t have a problem repeatedly showing pictures of Sam Fox’s bare breasts to the entire country when she was 16. I bet you had many a good wank over those. But because Huw’s preference was male, your homophobia overwhelms you and you think it disgusting. If it was a girl I would have thought exactly the same thing, but well done for playing the homophobia card. So could you explain why it was OK for the Sun to regularly publish semi-naked photographs of teenagers for thousands of dirty old men to wank over right up until 2015, whereas you find two consenting males privately sharing photos of their bottoms (or whatever) so abhorrent? Don’t bother, there is only one explanation.
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Jul 12, 2023 18:49:52 GMT
The only point he makes is that he is awash with homophobia. Your head is too big. Well that is certainly what my mother said as she was pushing me out.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Jul 12, 2023 18:49:56 GMT
And out it comes again...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 12, 2023 18:50:56 GMT
He makes valid points though. The only point he makes is that he is awash with homophobia. Not at all, he’s making points on factual issues. I know morals are not your strong point, but batting facts away with accusations of homophobia are pretty limp. However, we all know your history, so I suppose your sticking up for Huw will make you feel better about yourself.
|
|
|
Post by metanoia on Jul 12, 2023 18:52:15 GMT
It's SO very boring and predictable .... you'd have thought he'd got over it by now.
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Jul 12, 2023 18:54:40 GMT
And out it comes again... Yes. That is because you have one set of standards for heterosexual things and a different set of standards for homosexual things. You can meme it as much as you like but you are still a sad old homophobe. And actually, sad old homophobes often turn out to be frustrated homosexuals that don’t have the balls (pun intended) to come out. I feel sorry that you remain so closeted that you have to live alone on a boat in the middle of nowhere, and your only joy is going to work so you can be around roughy toughy truckers. And we all know what they get up to in the dead of night in the motorway service station lorry park.
|
|
|
Post by Trina on Jul 12, 2023 18:55:24 GMT
The only point he makes is that he is awash with homophobia. Not at all, he’s making points on factual issues. I know morals are not your strong point, but batting facts away with accusations of homophobia are pretty limp. However, we all know your history, so I suppose your sticking up for Huw will make you feel better about yourself. 'Sticking up for Hugh' is a comment which can be read in a variety of ways...
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Jul 12, 2023 18:58:51 GMT
And out it comes again... Yes. That is because you have one set of standards for heterosexual things and a different set of standards for homosexual things. You can meme it as much as you like but you are still a sad old homophobe. And actually, sad old homophobes often turn out to be frustrated homosexuals that don’t have the balls (pun intended) to come out. I feel sorry that you remain so closeted that you have to live alone on a boat in the middle of nowhere, and your only joy is going to work so you can be around roughy toughy truckers. And we all know what they get up to in the dead of night in the motorway service station lorry park. Obviously the gin bottle is in full use already.
|
|
|
Post by metanoia on Jul 12, 2023 18:59:13 GMT
And out it comes again... Yes. That is because you have one set of standards for heterosexual things and a different set of standards for homosexual things. You can meme it as much as you like but you are still a sad old homophobe. And actually, sad old homophobes often turn out to be frustrated homosexuals that don’t have the balls (pun intended) to come out. I feel sorry that you remain so closeted that you have to live alone on a boat in the middle of nowhere, and your only joy is going to work so you can be around roughy toughy truckers. And we all know what they get up to in the dead of night in the motorway service station lorry park. What a truly depraved, deprived nasty person you are. Hope you and Huw are having a good laugh over your G&Ts tonight, mocking poor sad, confused teenagers and taking the piss out of the mentally ill.
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Jul 12, 2023 18:59:48 GMT
The only point he makes is that he is awash with homophobia. Not at all, he’s making points on factual issues. I know morals are not your strong point, but batting facts away with accusations of homophobia are pretty limp. However, we all know your history, so I suppose your sticking up for Huw will make you feel better about yourself. So what point was he actually making? That the Sun has outed Huw for an online image sharing thing with someone over the age of consent, whilst having no opinion on the Sun’s decades of publishing daily pictures of people of similar age’s intimate parts. The difference? Heterosexual vs Homosexual. Well not even that I suppose, since probably some lezzers liked the suns titifications. No, it is because it is OK to interact with pictures of girls (over the age of consent) but not with those of boys (ditto). So we can add misogyny to homophobia. All of which of course is why he lives alone in the middle of nowhere etc etc.
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Jul 12, 2023 19:01:31 GMT
Yes. That is because you have one set of standards for heterosexual things and a different set of standards for homosexual things. You can meme it as much as you like but you are still a sad old homophobe. And actually, sad old homophobes often turn out to be frustrated homosexuals that don’t have the balls (pun intended) to come out. I feel sorry that you remain so closeted that you have to live alone on a boat in the middle of nowhere, and your only joy is going to work so you can be around roughy toughy truckers. And we all know what they get up to in the dead of night in the motorway service station lorry park. What a depraved, deprived nasty person you truly are. Hope you and Huw are having a good laugh over your G&Ts tonight, mocking sad teenagers and the mentally ill. Well I do agree that you are mentally ill. Although I’m told ECT is very successful. You should try it. Can I watch?
|
|
|
Post by on Jul 12, 2023 19:01:36 GMT
It would be unteresting to see what happened if it had been a 60 yar old woman engaging with a 17 yar old female.
The reaction could have been quite different.
One of my mothers friends was a teacher and she was being dicked by a 15 yar old boy in her class for a while. She was around 50 with teenage children. It fizzled out after a while and the story was that her own dad had been shagging her from a fairly early age which caused some issues.
Sad really but I suppose these things happen.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 12, 2023 19:02:22 GMT
And out it comes again... your only joy is going to work so you can be around roughy toughy truckers. And we all know what they get up to in the dead of night in the motorway service station lorry park. Do we? Not all of us have a cv with such qualifications as yours. 😏
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Jul 12, 2023 19:05:29 GMT
Not at all, he’s making points on factual issues. I know morals are not your strong point, but batting facts away with accusations of homophobia are pretty limp. However, we all know your history, so I suppose your sticking up for Huw will make you feel better about yourself. So what point was he actually making? That the Sun has outed Huw for an online image sharing thing with someone over the age of consent At least two of the teenagers involved were under the age of consent. "The Protection of Children Act 1978 makes it illegal to take, make, show, distribute or possess in order to distribute “indecent photographs” of anyone under eighteen. It is also illegal for anyone to permit indecent photos of children to be taken, either by the child or someone else".
|
|