|
Post by Jim on Nov 6, 2023 18:09:48 GMT
I see you still haven’t bothered to explain why you think the cc’ers surcharge is a good idea even though it will cost more than it ever raises? I've said why several times, equality of total contribution to CRT. You haven't presented any evidence that it will cost more, it's just a firmly held opinion.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Nov 6, 2023 18:36:41 GMT
I see you still haven’t bothered to explain why you think the cc’ers surcharge is a good idea even though it will cost more than it ever raises? I've said why several times, equality of total contribution to CRT. You haven't presented any evidence that it will cost more, it's just a firmly held opinion. Licence evasion is already on the rise. Ps Jim the equality argument has been proven to be bollocks. You pay extra for extra services. Use of a mooring, it’s your choice to use that or not.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Nov 6, 2023 18:42:33 GMT
I've said why several times, equality of total contribution to CRT. You haven't presented any evidence that it will cost more, it's just a firmly held opinion. Licence evasion is already on the rise. That's not evidence to support your proposition though. You are presenting a false arguement... Murdering babies isnt right, so let's make it illegal, Noooo, shout the naysayers, that will result in the murder of more babies, we'll make sure it happens. We love murdering babies, lovely on toast.
|
|
|
Post by dogless on Nov 6, 2023 20:18:59 GMT
Licence evasion is already on the rise. That's not evidence to support your proposition though. You are presenting a false arguement... Murdering babies isnt right, so let's make it illegal, Noooo, shout the naysayers, that will result in the murder of more babies, we'll make sure it happens. We love murdering babies, lovely on toast. Did you read what you wrote before posting Jim ? I fear your meds are too strong. That's utter piffle my friend. Rog
|
|
|
Post by on Nov 6, 2023 20:21:25 GMT
Also it is argument not arguement.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Nov 7, 2023 16:34:10 GMT
That's not evidence to support your proposition though. You are presenting a false arguement... Murdering babies isnt right, so let's make it illegal, Noooo, shout the naysayers, that will result in the murder of more babies, we'll make sure it happens. We love murdering babies, lovely on toast. Did you read what you wrote before posting Jim ? I fear your meds are too strong. That's utter piffle my friend. Rog Of course it's piffle, just demonstrating, by using the same unevidenced reasoning, what piffle is.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2023 8:49:33 GMT
The thing is, CRT have used the term surcharge and they are entitled to use it. Both NABO and NBTA are shouting about legality etc when in fact neither understand what the fuck the legal position is anyway. Meanwhile, parry and his (now expanding) legal team are laughing their socks off whilst plotting the next pension pot filler. Even if someone legally challenged the decision, the judge is going to be on CRT's side, because quite simply, the money has to come from somewhere. The only way to fuck CRT would be a mass withholding of licence payments and a total lockdown of towpath and canals by boat owners. Neither of course will happen, because the majority of ccers are lazy and apathy rules. Parrys empire building will continue until such time as he feels he has enough money in his pot to retire.
|
|