|
Post by kris on May 2, 2024 17:54:08 GMT
If you post a reference to the untruths you think I’ve posted I’ll answer to them. But I haven’t posted anything about you that I don’t believe to be true. So maybe you should actually contact the police and we will let them decide? There are no untruths that I THINK you have posted in the pages of this forum, . . but there ARE a great many malicious untruths that I KNOW you have posted in the pages of this forum. In your post preceding the one quoted here, and in a laughable attempt to substantiate one of the malicious fabrications published in this thread, you say - quote - "But it’s not false Tony. Unless you where lying when you told me about it?". You then go on to say, in the post quoted here, that you haven't posted anything that you - quote - "don't believe to be true". If that's the best you can do in an effort to substantiate the malicious fabrications you persist in publishing, or by way of a defence to the specific offences you have committed, and continue to commit, under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, then you would be well advised to seek legal advice, . . or give some time over to acquainting yourself with the provisions of the 1997 Act, . . if you're capable of understanding more than the odd word or two of any of them :- www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/40/contents So you didn’t end up in court over not paying for storage of your junk?
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on May 2, 2024 18:02:17 GMT
There are no untruths that I THINK you have posted in the pages of this forum, . . but there ARE a great many malicious untruths that I KNOW you have posted in the pages of this forum. In your post preceding the one quoted here, and in a laughable attempt to substantiate one of the malicious fabrications published in this thread, you say - quote - "But it’s not false Tony. Unless you where lying when you told me about it?". You then go on to say, in the post quoted here, that you haven't posted anything that you - quote - "don't believe to be true". If that's the best you can do in an effort to substantiate the malicious fabrications you persist in publishing, or by way of a defence to the specific offences you have committed, and continue to commit, under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, then you would be well advised to seek legal advice, . . or give some time over to acquainting yourself with the provisions of the 1997 Act, . . if you're capable of understanding more than the odd word or two of any of them :- www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/40/contents So you didn’t end up in court over not paying for storage of your junk? No, . . I didn't.
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 2, 2024 18:04:00 GMT
So your a liar then? Ps Tony wye has been sold as well as Mersey.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on May 2, 2024 20:16:14 GMT
So your a liar then? Ps Tony wye has been sold as well as Mersey. Interesting and rather unusual train of thought there, . . which, incidentally, brings the idiot's tally of malicious untruths in this thread alone, up to a total of five. I state that an earlier malicious fabrication on the part of habitual liar kris isn't true, and never was true, . . and that leads him to the conclusion that I'm the one who's been lying.
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 3, 2024 7:03:03 GMT
Notice the question mark Tony. “Your a liar then?” It’s a question?
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 4, 2024 11:59:15 GMT
Nobody reads your posts Tony.
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 5, 2024 5:58:52 GMT
Nobody reads your posts anymore Tony.
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 5, 2024 12:19:20 GMT
Nobody reads your posts anymore Tony. bump to you to.
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 8, 2024 7:23:47 GMT
There’s one way this forum would be good if it was like cwdf. If it banned you Tony. You really haven’t got anything to say anymore, you are a stuck record.
|
|
|
Post by Clinton Cool on May 8, 2024 7:32:09 GMT
There’s one way this forum would be good if it was like cwdf. If it banned you Tony. You really haven’t got anything to say anymore, you are a stuck record. Yes but then someone needs to decide who is banned. And then it might be me, simply for believing and stating that Israeli action in Gaza isn't genocide and to describe it as such cheapens and undermines the very small number of true acts of genocide which have been committed in recent history. So when someone decides, bias comes into play. As we can see above.
|
|
|
Post by on May 8, 2024 7:43:50 GMT
AI should be able to sort it out. There must be a way to automatically delete posts which are repetitions of previous posts.
All TD is doing is using the forum as an SEO tool when he doesn't understand how search engine optimisation functions.
If admin or software could delete repetition it would clean the place up considerably.
Its not about banning its about avoidance of tedium.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on May 8, 2024 8:01:35 GMT
AI should be able to sort it out. There must be a way to automatically delete posts which are repetitions of previous posts. All TD is doing is using the forum as an SEO tool when he doesn't understand how search engine optimisation functions. If admin or software could delete repetition it would clean the place up considerably. Its not about banning its about avoidance of tedium. H e also believes CRT are bothered by his posts, they aren't or they would have done something about it, apart from the letter. A tiny flea not worth scratching, a sad little man jumping up and down ( well he might get 10mm in the air on them old legs) annoying everyone around him. Could have been so different, he could have been the helpful avuncular boat expert with a boat.
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 8, 2024 11:41:26 GMT
There’s one way this forum would be good if it was like cwdf. If it banned you Tony. You really haven’t got anything to say anymore, you are a stuck record. Yes but then someone needs to decide who is banned. And then it might be me, simply for believing and stating that Israeli action in Gaza isn't genocide and to describe it as such cheapens and undermines the very small number of true acts of genocide which have been committed in recent history. So when someone decides, bias comes into play. As we can see above. It was a humorous comment. Is it obligatory to have a sense of humour bypass to live in Wales? 🙃just to save confusion.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on May 8, 2024 13:58:20 GMT
That's three malicious fabrications you now have to publicly retract and apologise for, . . and those three are on top of the approximately four years worth of similar untrue malicious garbage you've posted on the pages of this forum with the intention of doing harm to my professional reputation and good name. As above - see also :- thunderboat.boards.net/post/397376/thread If you post a reference to the untruths you think I’ve posted I’ll answer to them. But I haven’t posted anything about you that I don’t believe to be true. So maybe you should actually contact the police and we will let them decide? I don't THINK you have posted a great many malicious untruths in the pages of this forum, . . I KNOW you have posted a great many malicious untruths in the pages of this forum. In your post preceding the one quoted here, and in a laughable attempt to substantiate one of the malicious fabrications published in this thread, you say - quote - "But it’s not false Tony. Unless you where lying when you told me about it?". You then go on to say, in the post quoted here, that you haven't posted anything that you - quote - "don't believe to be true". If that's the best you can do in an effort to substantiate the malicious fabrications you persist in publishing, or by way of a defence to the specific offences you have committed, and continue to commit, under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, then you would be well advised to seek legal advice, . . or give some time over to acquainting yourself with the provisions of the 1997 Act, . . if you're capable of understanding more than the odd word or two of any of them :- www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/40/contents
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on May 10, 2024 12:11:02 GMT
A couple of days with the Thunderboat's wretched little collection of internet trolls, online stalkers, and vacuous all round arsewipes left more or less to their own devices in terms of providing interesting content for the forum's pages, . . and the number of 'Guests Online in the Last 24 Hours' drops from just under 2,100 to this, at 0630 hrs this morning :-
Users Online in the Last 24 Hours 0 Staff, 17 Members, 1,370 Guests.
|
|