Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2021 14:17:28 GMT
Well the PRN has been discussed over the years by a couple of notable people who seemed to know their shit when it comes to the law. NigelMoore and TonyDunkley. I have always assumed the Thames had a PRN status but my 1979 "Launch Digest" issued by the then navigation authority Thames Water has disabused me of this notion. Quite intriguing. It's only the Thames but I really did think it was a PRN river.   |
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Aug 31, 2021 15:20:38 GMT
According to this: nabo.org.uk/files/members/right_of_nav.pdfthere is prn on the Thames. Presumably it is the need for a licence that is your issue, but maybe the answer is that the licence is just a vehicle to ensure you have a BSS, hence there is no charge for it. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2021 16:03:22 GMT
The publication it comes from is from 1979 which is 26 years before the BS Scheme came into existence.
I remember before 1995 there was a CofC but it was not mandatory in order to acquire a license / registration.
|
|
|
|
Post by tonyb on Sept 1, 2021 6:48:49 GMT
The publication it comes from is from 1979 which is 26 years before the BS Scheme came into existence. I remember before 1995 there was a CofC but it was not mandatory in order to acquire a license / registration. Not so sure about that. The local navigation officer inspected all new on the Thames hire boats and did random checks ober years. |
|
