|
Post by kris on Jun 23, 2023 5:40:20 GMT
If your so concerned about the condition of my boat, why did you try to insist I ran it aground? Or have you forgotten about that?
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Jun 23, 2023 8:51:39 GMT
Stunning bridge don't you think ? Rog Nice but can't beat a nice skew arch.
|
|
|
Post by dinky on Jun 23, 2023 12:42:06 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Jun 23, 2023 14:51:23 GMT
Tony Dunkley <tonydtrent@gmail.com> 2:21 PM (1 hour ago) to Glyn.Bumford, Matthew, Tom, richard.parry Canalboat "Desiree" - Index No 73371 - Third Party InsuranceMr Bumford, The following e-mail has been transmitted twice: 0917hrs today and 1351hrs Thu 22 June 2023:- Mr Bumford,
Having had sight of your e-mail communication with V Coventon dated 21 June 2023 and timed at 1540 hrs, it is plain that you and Ms Barry have been foolish and naive enough to accept sight of an insurance certificate as proof that the proposal upon which the insurance cover is based is/was correctly completed and contained all the necessary relevant information.
A moment's thought on the part of anyone with even the most basic knowledge of the steps in the process of arranging insurance cover would expose the fundamental flaws in both your and Ms Barry's reasoning.
You and Ms Barry may regard Coventon's questionable assurances, and a certificate issued in good faith by a broker, as - quote - "the end of the matter" - but neither I nor others do, and are not prepared to let the matter rest on the outcome of the joint mis-directed, ill-considered and distinctly sloppy efforts made yesterday.
Regards, A.K Dunkley.
_____________________________________________________ Your attention is drawn, once again, to the last paragraph of the above. If, after giving further thought to the the last paragraph, your apparent difficulties in understanding this relatively simple matter continue, then I suggest that you read the explanations given in these two Thunderboat forum posts :- thunderboat.boards.net/post/370918/thread thunderboat.boards.net/post/371011/threadRegards, A.K.Dunkley
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Jun 23, 2023 14:56:18 GMT
Tony Dunkley <tonydtrent@gmail.com> 2:21 PM (1 hour ago) to Glyn.Bumford, Matthew, Tom, richard.parry Canalboat "Desiree" - Index No 73371 - Third Party InsuranceMr Bumford, The following e-mail has been transmitted twice: 0917hrs today and 1351hrs Thu 22 June 2023:- Mr Bumford,
Having had sight of your e-mail communication with V Coventon dated 21 June 2023 and timed at 1540 hrs, it is plain that you and Ms Barry have been foolish and naive enough to accept sight of an insurance certificate as proof that the proposal upon which the insurance cover is based is/was correctly completed and contained all the necessary relevant information.
A moment's thought on the part of anyone with even the most basic knowledge of the steps in the process of arranging insurance cover would expose the fundamental flaws in both your and Ms Barry's reasoning.
You and Ms Barry may regard Coventon's questionable assurances, and a certificate issued in good faith by a broker, as - quote - "the end of the matter" - but neither I nor others do, and are not prepared to let the matter rest on the outcome of the joint mis-directed, ill-considered and distinctly sloppy efforts made yesterday.
Regards, A.K Dunkley.
_____________________________________________________ Your attention is drawn, once again, to the last paragraph of the above. If, after giving further thought to the the last paragraph, your apparent difficulties in understanding this relatively simple matter continue, then I suggest that you read the explanations given in these two Thunderboat forum posts :- thunderboat.boards.net/post/370918/thread thunderboat.boards.net/post/371011/threadRegards, A.K.Dunkley I hope you publish the reply, whatever it says. That would be the honourable thing to do.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Jun 23, 2023 14:58:21 GMT
Tony Dunkley <tonydtrent@gmail.com> 2:21 PM (1 hour ago) to Glyn.Bumford, Matthew, Tom, richard.parry Canalboat "Desiree" - Index No 73371 - Third Party InsuranceMr Bumford, The following e-mail has been transmitted twice: 0917hrs today and 1351hrs Thu 22 June 2023:- Mr Bumford,
Having had sight of your e-mail communication with V Coventon dated 21 June 2023 and timed at 1540 hrs, it is plain that you and Ms Barry have been foolish and naive enough to accept sight of an insurance certificate as proof that the proposal upon which the insurance cover is based is/was correctly completed and contained all the necessary relevant information.
A moment's thought on the part of anyone with even the most basic knowledge of the steps in the process of arranging insurance cover would expose the fundamental flaws in both your and Ms Barry's reasoning.
You and Ms Barry may regard Coventon's questionable assurances, and a certificate issued in good faith by a broker, as - quote - "the end of the matter" - but neither I nor others do, and are not prepared to let the matter rest on the outcome of the joint mis-directed, ill-considered and distinctly sloppy efforts made yesterday.
Regards, A.K Dunkley.
_____________________________________________________ Your attention is drawn, once again, to the last paragraph of the above. If, after giving further thought to the the last paragraph, your apparent difficulties in understanding this relatively simple matter continue, then I suggest that you read the explanations given in these two Thunderboat forum posts :- thunderboat.boards.net/post/370918/thread thunderboat.boards.net/post/371011/threadRegards, A.K.Dunkley I hope you publish the reply, whatever it says. I can see why you're a clown.
|
|
|
Post by fi on Jun 23, 2023 15:03:07 GMT
Tony Dunkley <tonydtrent@gmail.com> 2:21 PM (1 hour ago) to Glyn.Bumford, Matthew, Tom, richard.parry Canalboat "Desiree" - Index No 73371 - Third Party InsuranceMr Bumford, The following e-mail has been transmitted twice: 0917hrs today and 1351hrs Thu 22 June 2023:- Mr Bumford,
Having had sight of your e-mail communication with V Coventon dated 21 June 2023 and timed at 1540 hrs, it is plain that you and Ms Barry have been foolish and naive enough to accept sight of an insurance certificate as proof that the proposal upon which the insurance cover is based is/was correctly completed and contained all the necessary relevant information.
A moment's thought on the part of anyone with even the most basic knowledge of the steps in the process of arranging insurance cover would expose the fundamental flaws in both your and Ms Barry's reasoning.
You and Ms Barry may regard Coventon's questionable assurances, and a certificate issued in good faith by a broker, as - quote - "the end of the matter" - but neither I nor others do, and are not prepared to let the matter rest on the outcome of the joint mis-directed, ill-considered and distinctly sloppy efforts made yesterday.
Regards, A.K Dunkley.
_____________________________________________________ Your attention is drawn, once again, to the last paragraph of the above. If, after giving further thought to the the last paragraph, your apparent difficulties in understanding this relatively simple matter continue, then I suggest that you read the explanations given in these two Thunderboat forum posts :- thunderboat.boards.net/post/370918/thread thunderboat.boards.net/post/371011/threadRegards, A.K.Dunkley I hope you publish the reply, whatever it says. That would be the honourable thing to do. Why the fuck are you bothering to engage with Tony? (genuine question btw) Many have realised it's best to leave him alone, the forum would be better if you followed them.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Jun 24, 2023 5:45:20 GMT
Remind us Tony did you have insurance on the two boats of your own that crt have taken from you?
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Jun 24, 2023 6:22:35 GMT
Tony Dunkley <tonydtrent@gmail.com> 2:21 PM (1 hour ago) to Glyn.Bumford, Matthew, Tom, richard.parry Canalboat "Desiree" - Index No 73371 - Third Party InsuranceMr Bumford, The following e-mail has been transmitted twice: 0917hrs today and 1351hrs Thu 22 June 2023:- Mr Bumford,
Having had sight of your e-mail communication with V Coventon dated 21 June 2023 and timed at 1540 hrs, it is plain that you and Ms Barry have been foolish and naive enough to accept sight of an insurance certificate as proof that the proposal upon which the insurance cover is based is/was correctly completed and contained all the necessary relevant information.
A moment's thought on the part of anyone with even the most basic knowledge of the steps in the process of arranging insurance cover would expose the fundamental flaws in both your and Ms Barry's reasoning.
You and Ms Barry may regard Coventon's questionable assurances, and a certificate issued in good faith by a broker, as - quote - "the end of the matter" - but neither I nor others do, and are not prepared to let the matter rest on the outcome of the joint mis-directed, ill-considered and distinctly sloppy efforts made yesterday.
Regards, A.K Dunkley.
_____________________________________________________ Your attention is drawn, once again, to the last paragraph of the above. If, after giving further thought to the the last paragraph, your apparent difficulties in understanding this relatively simple matter continue, then I suggest that you read the explanations given in these two Thunderboat forum posts :- thunderboat.boards.net/post/370918/thread thunderboat.boards.net/post/371011/threadRegards, A.K.Dunkley I hope you publish the reply, whatever it says. That would be the honourable thing to do. My reply to Jim's comment has been made in a more appropriately titled thread, . . a thread title that hasn't been pissed about with and altered by a mindless semi-literate psychopath with a shit fetish, called Kris Nadin. Kris Nadin is a well known local nutcase who hangs around the Long Eaton area, and is best known for storing Vince ( Mr Scabby) Coventon's reserve stock of brain transplant organs in cardboard boxes in the leaking bodged-up uninsurable old wreck he lives on, . . for the time being, . . until C&RT(Ltd)'s Customer/Licence Support Team catches up with him, evicts him from it, . . and then it's seized by CBS and Brian Clarke to add to his ever growing collection of stolen boats hidden on his farm near Chester.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Jun 24, 2023 6:34:22 GMT
Are you talking about the boats they have taken from yourself Tony?
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Jun 24, 2023 6:44:51 GMT
Remind us Tony did you have insurance on the two boats of your own that crt have taken from you? Not that it's any business of a mindless, semi-literate psychopath like you, . . . but Halcyon Daze was covered by my own insurance, whereas the responsibility for any insurance cover in respect of Selby Michael lay with the Official Receiver, . . from the time the OR took possession.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Jun 24, 2023 6:47:19 GMT
Remind us Tony did you have insurance on the two boats of your own that crt have taken from you? Not that it's any business of a mindless, semi-literate psychopath like you, . . . but Halcyon Daze was covered by my own insurance, whereas the responsibility for any insurance cover in respect of Selby Michael lay with the Official Receiver, . . from the time the OR took possession. Bullshit, halcyon daze didn’t have a safety cert so no insurance. As the official receiver wasn’t interested in selby micheal that’s bullshit as well. You should feel guilty for how you’ve treated selby micheal.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Jun 24, 2023 7:47:28 GMT
Not that it's any business of a mindless, semi-literate psychopath like you, . . . but Halcyon Daze was covered by my own insurance, whereas the responsibility for any insurance cover in respect of Selby Michael lay with the Official Receiver, . . from the time the OR took possession. Bullshit, halcyon daze didn’t have a safety cert so no insurance. As the official receiver wasn’t interested in selby micheal that’s bullshit as well. You should feel guilty for how you’ve treated selby micheal. . . . as I said, . . mindless, semi-literate psychopath, . . albeit, one who knows intimately the mind and workings of the Official Receiver.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Jun 24, 2023 7:49:45 GMT
Remind us Tony did you have insurance on the two boats of your own that crt have taken from you? It's a shame they weren't insured against theft. Or just maybe, they were, but the insurance company know nowts are colluding with CRT, CBS and the Courts. imgflip.com/gif/1lfu0c
|
|
|
Post by kris on Jun 24, 2023 7:53:42 GMT
Bullshit, halcyon daze didn’t have a safety cert so no insurance. As the official receiver wasn’t interested in selby micheal that’s bullshit as well. You should feel guilty for how you’ve treated selby micheal. . . . as I said, . . mindless, semi-literate psychopath, . . albeit, one who knows intimately the mind and workings of the Official Receiver. Remind us who is it lost his boat because he’s too tight to spend £100 and get a safety cert?
|
|