|
Post by Telemachus on Aug 13, 2023 20:57:17 GMT
At least Tony produced content, even if it was repetitive. More than most people do here nowadays, it seems most people here wait for someone else to post content. Then jump in with negative, snarky comments. Irony 101
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Aug 13, 2023 20:59:19 GMT
Yes. You can actively not want to have a sexual relationship with other men (blow jobs, penetrative arse sex, heavy petting and public tongue kissing) and not be homophobic. I hope this helps. Correct. It does not make you homophobic. Just rather prudish and constrained by 20th century convention. If the idea of anal sex with another man is unappealing, then that makes a man rather prudish and constrained by 20th century convention? Are you for real? EDIT to add that is has been the 21st century for over 20 years now.
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Aug 13, 2023 21:04:05 GMT
Correct. It does not make you homophobic. Just rather prudish and constrained by 20th century convention. If the idea of anal sex is unappealing, then that makes a man rather prudish and constrained by 20th century convention? Are you for real? EDIT to add that is has been the 21st century for over 20 years now. Yes. I just pinched myself and I am definitely real. As to the edit, yes dumdum I know which century it is. That was the point, which was clearly too complex for you to grasp.
|
|
|
Nuneaton
Aug 13, 2023 21:06:17 GMT
via mobile
Post by kris on Aug 13, 2023 21:06:17 GMT
At least Tony produced content, even if it was repetitive. More than most people do here nowadays, it seems most people here wait for someone else to post content. Then jump in with negative, snarky comments. Irony 101 Thing is you took the bait.
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Aug 13, 2023 21:08:26 GMT
Thing is you took the bait. Is taking the bait a thing? Anyway I dislike hypocrisy and feel the need to call it out. Looks like I’m going to be busy…
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Aug 13, 2023 21:09:54 GMT
If the idea of anal sex is unappealing, then that makes a man rather prudish and constrained by 20th century convention? Are you for real? EDIT to add that is has been the 21st century for over 20 years now. Yes. I just pinched myself and I am definitely real. So if the idea of anal sex with another man is unappealing, then that makes a man rather prudish and constrained by 20th century convention?
|
|
|
Post by on Aug 13, 2023 21:12:24 GMT
Yes. I just pinched myself and I am definitely real. So if the idea of anal sex with another man is unappealing, then that makes a man rather prudish and constrained by 20th century convention? Not wanting to get shit on your dick does not make you prudish. Nick is just trying to get a rise out of you !
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Aug 13, 2023 21:18:13 GMT
Yes. I just pinched myself and I am definitely real. So if the idea of anal sex with another man is unappealing, then that makes a man rather prudish and constrained by 20th century convention? Seems quite echoey in here. Or maybe the TD style of posting is catching. Anyway it is always highly amusing that straight men can’t see beyond “anal sex” when they think of 2 blokes at it. No wonder your women left you, they were probably bored to tears with your complete repertoire comprising the missionary position and …no, just the missionary position. With the lights out, obviously.
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Aug 13, 2023 21:19:33 GMT
… just waiting to be slagged off again for “always turning every thread on to gay sex”…
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Aug 13, 2023 21:27:16 GMT
So if the idea of anal sex with another man is unappealing, then that makes a man rather prudish and constrained by 20th century convention? Anyway it is always highly amusing that straight men can’t see beyond “anal sex” when they think of 2 blokes at it. Do you put it in Geoff's fanny then?
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Aug 13, 2023 21:27:23 GMT
So if the idea of anal sex with another man is unappealing, then that makes a man rather prudish and constrained by 20th century convention? Seems quite echoey in here. Or maybe the TD style of posting is catching. Anyway it is always highly amusing that straight men can’t see beyond “anal sex” when they think of 2 blokes at it. No wonder your women left you, they were probably bored to tears with your complete repertoire comprising the missionary position and …no, just the missionary position. With the lights out, obviously. Personally I prefer not to speculate. As previously mentioned, I suspect the majority of people likely share the view while quietly respecting your right to live as you wish and hope that you keep it to your bloody self.
|
|
|
Nuneaton
Aug 13, 2023 21:29:33 GMT
via mobile
Post by on Aug 13, 2023 21:29:33 GMT
Ain't it awful.
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Aug 13, 2023 21:30:52 GMT
Seems quite echoey in here. Or maybe the TD style of posting is catching. Anyway it is always highly amusing that straight men can’t see beyond “anal sex” when they think of 2 blokes at it. No wonder your women left you, they were probably bored to tears with your complete repertoire comprising the missionary position and …no, just the missionary position. With the lights out, obviously. Personally I prefer not to speculate. As previously mentioned, I suspect the majority of people likely share the view while quietly respecting your right to live as you wish and hope that you keep it to your bloody self. Why should I keep it to my bloody self? Well, no more than any bloody heterosexuals should. But they tend not to. Anyway, it is not me constantly banging on about anal sex (which by the way is not limited to the poofs) so take your whinging up with thos who are.
|
|
|
Post by dogless on Aug 13, 2023 21:48:11 GMT
Have to say I've gone off Nuneaton if this is what we have to tolerate.
The bus journey home would be very uncomfortable 😁
Do we have to do this every other day folks ?
Rog
ETA Wouldn't it be great if we could all just accept each other as we are without the need to judge, criticise, or condemn ... agreement isn't essential, just tolerance
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Aug 13, 2023 23:24:10 GMT
Personally I prefer not to speculate. As previously mentioned, I suspect the majority of people likely share the view while quietly respecting your right to live as you wish and hope that you keep it to your bloody self. Why should I keep it to my bloody self? Well, no more than any bloody heterosexuals should. But they tend not to. Anyway, it is not me constantly banging on about anal sex (which by the way is not limited to the poofs) so take your whinging up with thos who are. Explicit description is usually confined to publications of various sorts dedicated to the subject while elsewhere euphemism and allusion tends to be the general usage. But, as previously highlighted, homosexuality is still a minority activity which often provokes humour as a secondary response in heterosexual folks; the primary reaction is not approval. I suspect most people have an imagination sufficient to the visualisation of many activities but some of us would prefer to contemplate something else. Reminders are entirely unnecessary. Which is why I, for one, would indeed prefer you keep it to your bloody self. Incidentally, I find the recent bout of abuse directed towards yourself and Jeff to be highly unpleasant and, in some instances, seemingly grounds for the very real possibility of criminal charges being brought. Such is the behaviour of the mob. The incredibly tolerant approach you've maintained thus far is surprising, to say the least. It just goes to show that there really are no limits to the depths to which some participants in this often very nasty cesspit will sink.
|
|