|
Post by Telemachus on May 21, 2018 20:21:45 GMT
By PM, in response to demands for a “Public Apology (WITHOUT mentioning my real name)”, I explained what “bluster” actually was, and at that point they went a bit quiet!
Dan sure knows how to pick ‘em!
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on May 21, 2018 20:22:42 GMT
Boohoo you have spoilt my line - was going to be: “NB Lolly PM’d me their name and guess what, it turns out to be Lady Cassandra!” Pompous or what! Well well well. Fuckin bitch mcbitchface. For the avoidance of doubt, “not really!”
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2018 20:44:32 GMT
Well well well. Fuckin bitch mcbitchface. For the avoidance of doubt, “not really!” Bummer. I see Paul (I lock myself in bathrooms) has also broke the surface for air again. 😂😂
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2018 20:47:30 GMT
Cwdf should be registered as some sort of last stop, given it's sheltering of senile old coffin dodgers.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2018 21:02:01 GMT
Someone give fincher a medal, he wants to be a hero.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2018 21:05:02 GMT
Someone give fincher a medal, he wants to be a hero. CRT/CWDF anthem?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2018 21:11:45 GMT
Someone give fincher a medal, he wants to be a hero. CRT/CWDF anthem? He wouldn't hear that, he's as deaf as a post. That's why he doesn't hear half of what's said at meetings he attends.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2018 5:20:51 GMT
He wouldn't hear that, he's as deaf as a post. That's why he doesn't hear half of what's said at meetings he attends. Pardon?
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on May 22, 2018 7:05:00 GMT
"So once again an interesting thread has degenerated into petty point scoring." - how many points did you give yourself for that?
"Which is why I have just skipped 2 pages which seams par for the coarse now". Of course!
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 22, 2018 7:15:39 GMT
"So once again an interesting thread has degenerated into petty point scoring." - how many points did you give yourself for that? "Which is why I have just skipped 2 pages which seams par for the coarse now". Of course!Foxy just for clarity, are you moaning about a thread going off topic?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2018 7:19:34 GMT
"So once again an interesting thread has degenerated into petty point scoring." - how many points did you give yourself for that? "Which is why I have just skipped 2 pages which seams par for the coarse now". Of course!Foxy just for clarity, are you moaning about a thread going off topic? Quoting from cwf
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on May 22, 2018 7:23:34 GMT
My morning amusement over cappuccino and chocolate biscuits.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2018 7:37:01 GMT
Unlucky Foxy. My morning amusement is going to be savaging a shagged set of roller drive gears with a gert big hammer. I know what I'd rather be doing
|
|
|
Post by JohnV on May 22, 2018 7:45:04 GMT
My morning amusement is going to be salvaging some more clean and sparkly diesel from the rest of the murky muck stored on my deck
|
|
|
Post by Allan on May 22, 2018 8:36:36 GMT
Dear Canal & River Trust I am writing to complain about your handling of of my information request ‘Board Minutes & Papers (January & March 2018)’ and request a review. Full details of this request can be found at - www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/b... My complaints are - - C&RT failed to respond to this request promptly and within the time limit set by law. - By conflating this request with a dissimilar one and making unfounded allegations relating to it, C&RT is seeking refuse the request whilst no basis exists to do so. I would point out that, in her response of 23 April 2018, Melissa Ashdown-Hoff states ‘I can confirm this request was received on 18-Apr-18 and I am dealing with it in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Under the terms of the Act you are entitled to a response within 20 working days of receipt’. Having accepted that the data requested falls within the scope of the the Act and that I was entitled to a response within 20 days she eventually replied slightly later than 20 days claiming that she had replied earlier. Her lengthy and confusing reply conflates this request with another and makes various demands of the requestor unrelated to the request. However, essentially she has refused the request as vexatious. I would refer the reviewing manager to C&RT’s publication scheme - canalrivertrust.org.uk/the-publi... (last updated 18 October 2016) and, in particular, its commitment to pro-actively publish minutes and other papers relating to meetings of its Board of Trustees - canalrivertrust.org.uk/the-publi... (last updated 1 December 2016) I would ask the reviewing manager to explain why it considers this request to be vexatious when it relates to errors and omissions in information that C&RT is committed to pro-actively publish under its publication scheme. I would also ask the reviewing manager to ensure C&RT honors its commitment to pro-actively publish this information and provides me with the relevant links when it has done so. Yours faithfully, Allan Richards
|
|