Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2021 13:28:38 GMT
As we are repeating ourselves, be rude not to.. Seized yours though didn't they.. You can blart all day long Tony, but they are doing it and getting away with it. Different set of rules cover a boat that’s not lived on, so they didn’t really get away with anything, Dunkley gifted it to them.
|
|
|
Post by JohnV on Apr 15, 2021 14:11:00 GMT
As we are repeating ourselves, be rude not to.. Seized yours though didn't they.. You can blart all day long Tony, but they are doing it and getting away with it. Different set of rules cover a boat that’s not lived on, so they didn’t really get away with anything, Dunkley gifted it to them. so far we only have your word for it that it was not lived on
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2021 14:14:39 GMT
Different set of rules cover a boat that’s not lived on, so they didn’t really get away with anything, Dunkley gifted it to them. so far we only have your word for it that it was not lived on I’m not really bothered John. I know he wasn’t living aboard, and more importantly, so did crt. Hence why they didn’t break the law and evict him.
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on Apr 15, 2021 16:11:57 GMT
As we are repeating ourselves, be rude not to.. Seized yours though didn't they.. You can blart all day long Tony, but they are doing it and getting away with it. I'm unsure as to the point you're trying to make. They, . . being the mendacious lowlifes in charge of C&RT's laughingly named Customer/Licence Support Team and its similarly misnamed Legal and Governance Services, . . certainly have been 'getting away' with misleading and hoodwinking the Courts through abuse of due process, and grossly exceeding the boat removal powers they enjoy (hugely) under S.8 of the 1983 Act. Are you condoning C&RT's 8(+) years of as yet unpunished illegal activities, . . or are you complaining that up until now no organization or individual has been wholly successful in curbing at least some of the outrageous excesses in which this so-called Trust has indulged ?
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on Apr 15, 2021 16:39:59 GMT
so far we only have your word for it that it was not lived on I’m not really bothered John. I know he wasn’t living aboard, and more importantly, so did crt. Hence why they didn’t break the law and evict him. You don't 'know' anything ! You're either spouting malicious twaddle that's come from nowhere but your own warped mind, . . or you're relaying equally dubious drivel originating from some other congenital liar. I've asked you twice before to identify the source of your supposedly '100% assured' information about me not living aboard "Halcyon Daze", . . now I'm asking again. Break the habits of a lifetime, . . either come clean, or shut up !
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2021 17:03:23 GMT
I’m not really bothered John. I know he wasn’t living aboard, and more importantly, so did crt. Hence why they didn’t break the law and evict him. You don't 'know' anything ! You're either spouting malicious twaddle that's come from nowhere but your own warped mind, . . or you're relaying equally dubious drivel originating from some other congenital liar. I've asked you twice before to identify the source of your supposedly '100% assured' information about me not living aboard "Halcyon Daze", . . now I'm asking again. Break the habits of a lifetime, . . either come clean, or shut up !
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on Apr 16, 2021 19:07:14 GMT
As we are repeating ourselves, be rude not to.. Seized yours though didn't they.. You can blart all day long Tony, but they are doing it and getting away with it. I'm unsure as to the point you're trying to make. They, . . being the mendacious lowlifes in charge of C&RT's laughingly named Customer/Licence Support Team and its similarly misnamed Legal and Governance Services, . . certainly have been 'getting away' with misleading and hoodwinking the Courts through abuse of due process, and grossly exceeding the boat removal powers they enjoy (hugely) under S.8 of the 1983 Act. Are you condoning C&RT's 8(+) years of as yet unpunished illegal activities, . . or are you complaining that up until now no organization or individual has been wholly successful in curbing at least some of the outrageous excesses in which this so-called Trust has indulged ?
|
|
|
Post by kris on Apr 19, 2021 8:48:34 GMT
I hope you lot have given to this fund. Despite what the grumpy dunk says with out some form of legal challenge boating as we know it is fucked. Or maybe you want cart to be able to tell you how much time you have to spend on your mooring every year.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Apr 19, 2021 10:01:53 GMT
How much did you give, kris? nothing to do with you foxy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2021 10:44:51 GMT
I hope you lot have given to this fund. nothing to with you, kris. Prick
|
|
|
Post by kris on Apr 19, 2021 10:47:25 GMT
I hope you lot have given to this fund. nothing to with you, kris. do
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on Apr 19, 2021 11:45:24 GMT
I hope you lot have given to this fund. Despite what the grumpy dunk says with out some form of legal challenge boating as we know it is fucked. Or maybe you want cart to be able to tell you how much time you have to spend on your mooring every year. No-one, least of all me, is saying that there shouldn't be a legal challenge to C&RT's extra-statutory T&C's. What I am saying is that the challenge should be founded in Nigel Moore's analysis and arguments in respect of the long standing misuse and abuse by C&RT of S.43 of the 1962 Transport Act, . . rather than blowing whatever money this appeal raises on yet another lot of destined to fail arguments over grounds that have failed previously, . . AND are directed merely at the latest proposed amendments to Licence T&C's that in truth were invalid and unenforceable from the time they were first introduced. I've no doubt that the distinction will go straight over the top of your head, . . again, . . but that's your problem !
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2021 12:23:57 GMT
I hope you lot have given to this fund. Despite what the grumpy dunk says with out some form of legal challenge boating as we know it is fucked. Or maybe you want cart to be able to tell you how much time you have to spend on your mooring every year. No-one, least of all me, is saying that there shouldn't be a legal challenge to C&RT's extra-statutory T&C's. What I am saying is that the challenge should be founded in Nigel Moore's analysis and arguments in respect of the long standing misuse and abuse by C&RT of S.43 of the 1962 Transport Act, . . rather than blowing whatever money this appeal raises on yet another lot of destined to fail arguments over grounds that have failed previously, . . AND are directed merely at the latest proposed amendments to Licence T&C's that in truth were invalid and unenforceable from the time they were first introduced. I've no doubt that the distinction will go straight over the top of your head, . . again, . . but that's your problem ! Watch and learn. What’s happening with your court challenge? I’ll tell you, free of charge, fuckall. You’re full of wind and piss, yet you criticise, condemn and ridicule others who are sincere and make the effort. You’re a waste of space and full of wind. Whilst one or two support you, the majority think you’re a joke.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Apr 19, 2021 12:38:07 GMT
How much did you give, kris? Have you contributed. I'm sure they'll accept €€€€€. Or is it all talk round at the Wallet Moth Preservation Society?
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on Apr 19, 2021 12:38:48 GMT
No-one, least of all me, is saying that there shouldn't be a legal challenge to C&RT's extra-statutory T&C's. What I am saying is that the challenge should be founded in Nigel Moore's analysis and arguments in respect of the long standing misuse and abuse by C&RT of S.43 of the 1962 Transport Act, . . rather than blowing whatever money this appeal raises on yet another lot of destined to fail arguments over grounds that have failed previously, . . AND are directed merely at the latest proposed amendments to Licence T&C's that in truth were invalid and unenforceable from the time they were first introduced. I've no doubt that the distinction will go straight over the top of your head, . . again, . . but that's your problem ! Watch and learn. What’s happening with your court challenge? I’ll tell you, free of charge, fuckall. You’re full of wind and piss, yet you criticise, condemn and ridicule others who are sincere and make the effort. You’re a waste of space and full of wind. Whilst one or two support you, the majority think you’re a joke. The distinction went straight over the top of your head as well, . . didn't it ?
|
|