Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2016 13:22:03 GMT
Well it looks like I'm heading for a ban again, for pointing out the bleedin' obvious that Geo is the same person as graham.m. Never mind, I don't want to be a part of that lie so if Dan wants to ban me for telling the truth - again - then bring it on! Not sure why you would get banned for that, but sad and petty if you do!
|
|
|
Post by smileypete on Nov 28, 2016 13:25:18 GMT
Well it looks like I'm heading for a ban again, for pointing out the bleedin' obvious that Geo is the same person as graham.m. Never mind, I don't want to be a part of that lie so if Dan wants to ban me for telling the truth - again - then bring it on! Yer not fluffy enough dammit!
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Nov 28, 2016 14:24:17 GMT
Well it looks like I'm heading for a ban again, for pointing out the bleedin' obvious that Geo is the same person as graham.m. Never mind, I don't want to be a part of that lie so if Dan wants to ban me for telling the truth - again - then bring it on! Not sure why you would get banned for that, but sad and petty if you do! I'll get a warning if I persist. Presumably if I still persist I'll get a ban. So one gets banned for disobeying the mods, not for posting something bad.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Nov 28, 2016 14:31:04 GMT
I think the thing is Nick once you've be banned once, your on their norty list so it's just a matter of time.
|
|
|
Post by Saltysplash on Nov 28, 2016 14:36:14 GMT
Shameless post count upping post
|
|
|
Post by smileypete on Nov 28, 2016 14:49:03 GMT
I think the thing is Nick once you've be banned once, your on their norty list so it's just a matter of time.
|
|
|
Post by geo on Nov 28, 2016 15:10:50 GMT
Well it looks like I'm heading for a ban again, for pointing out the bleedin' obvious that Geo is the same person as graham.m. Never mind, I don't want to be a part of that lie so if Dan wants to ban me for telling the truth - again - then bring it on! It would be OK if it was true but the truth it is not. I know that the site has checked me out in various ways and they do not agree with you and I do not because I know it is not the truth. I am me and just me no one else. The fact that I do not agree with you on certain subjects seems to be your gripe get used to it, I have my opinion about things and you have yours so we disagree that is life and don't blame someone else.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Nov 28, 2016 15:15:03 GMT
I also though geo's 'flavour' was different from graham's - but where has graham gotten himself to? Unless he's in 'secret mode' and just reading. If Telemachus and geo are having a spat over at 'the other site' why have they brought it here?
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Nov 28, 2016 15:21:07 GMT
Well it looks like I'm heading for a ban again, for pointing out the bleedin' obvious that Geo is the same person as graham.m. Never mind, I don't want to be a part of that lie so if Dan wants to ban me for telling the truth - again - then bring it on! It would be OK if it was true but the truth it is not. I know that the site has checked me out in various ways and they do not agree with you and I do not because I know it is not the truth. I am me and just me no one else. The fact that I do not agree with you on certain subjects seems to be your gripe get used to it, I have my opinion about things and you have yours so we disagree that is life and don't blame someone else. So how do you explain the fact that you repeat all of graham's fallacious arguments of old nearly verbatim, have exactly the same failings of knowledge, bees in bonnet, and despite having very similar interests, are of the same generation, you have never engaged with graham on here at all. In fact there are spells when graham posts prolifically, spells when you post prolifically, but these spells never overlap. That is all one hell of a coincidence. i might have had a tinge of doubt previously but with your latest reinvention of the "90% of 90%" argument I no longer have any doubt.
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on Nov 28, 2016 15:21:23 GMT
I think the thing is Nick once you've be banned once, your on their norty list so it's just a matter of time. There are uncanny similarities between that, whatever it is, and Despicable Daniel's Linkedin photo from before he was sacked by JCB.
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Nov 28, 2016 15:24:00 GMT
If Telemachus and geo are having a spat over at 'the other site' why have they brought it here? We aren't really having a spat, but anyway this is the CWDF section so why not?
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Nov 28, 2016 15:29:08 GMT
I have seen geo many times state that he/she is not graham. Can you make a list of reasons why you suspect they are? Where the deuce has graham got to?
|
|
|
Post by geo on Nov 28, 2016 15:31:23 GMT
I also though geo's 'flavour' was different from graham's - but where has graham gotten himself to? Unless he's in 'secret mode' and just reading. If Telemachus and geo are having a spat over at 'the other site' why have they brought it here? I come over to read the Planet thread and just happened to notice the untrue remarks posted by Nick Norman so commented.
|
|
|
Post by tonyqj on Nov 28, 2016 15:52:00 GMT
I have seen geo many times state that he/she is not graham. Can you make a list of reasons why you suspect they are? Where the deuce has graham got to? I can't grab links to posts on my phone so perhaps Nick can oblige with Geo's recent absurd 90% of 90% post for you to compare to graham.m's post stating the same bleedin' ridiculous garbage.
|
|
|
Post by geo on Nov 28, 2016 16:02:43 GMT
It would be OK if it was true but the truth it is not. I know that the site has checked me out in various ways and they do not agree with you and I do not because I know it is not the truth. I am me and just me no one else. The fact that I do not agree with you on certain subjects seems to be your gripe get used to it, I have my opinion about things and you have yours so we disagree that is life and don't blame someone else. So how do you explain the fact that you repeat all of graham's fallacious arguments of old nearly verbatim, have exactly the same failings of knowledge, bees in bonnet, and despite having very similar interests, are of the same generation, you have never engaged with graham on here at all. In fact there are spells when graham posts prolifically, spells when you post prolifically, but these spells never overlap. That is all one hell of a coincidence. i might have had a tinge of doubt previously but with your latest reinvention of the "90% of 90%" argument I no longer have any doubt. They are what you see as fallacious arguments, the fact that you do not agree with them is what makes you consider them fallacious arguments. Interesting I believe Daniel is an Engineer and I am sure that his training will have given him a good basic if not better insight into the subject so he could decide whether my posts are fallacious or not and obviously he has decided not. Heck I am now not allowed to have similar interest as someone else. As to being of the same generation I would not know. Why should I have engaged with this graham, I do not recall see any of his posts or if I did, I obviously did not disagree with them or my interest at the time was different, I don't know and why should I account to you about what I decide to post on or not post on. I post when I have time in my day, am bored etc, probably the same as some of you. As to where this graham has gone I have no idea. I gather he no longer has a boat, so might it be he, I am assuming he, has lost interest in the forums. Looking on here he posted about having to sell his boat and seemed very cut up about it, so could it actually cause him pain to come on the forums about boats that he can no longer have, don't know but I suspect it could. As to the alleged reinvention of the "90% of 90%" argument, it has been a known fact for years and I was both taught and shown the effect many years ago, basically continually undercharge a battery by a given amount continually and quite quickly the battery loss is no longer just 10% it grows in slightly under 10% lumps. It is in the battery world a known phenomena and the cause of the majority of failed batteries, sulphation, and attempted claims under warranties.
|
|