|
Post by tonyqj on Nov 28, 2016 22:08:03 GMT
As was noted on CW a couple of days ago, "Empty vessels" and all that.
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Nov 28, 2016 22:12:18 GMT
tonyb didn't try to "bully" you. I have never seen a post of his that wasn't a genuine attempt to assist. Your attack on him was nasty, spiteful and petty. I have met too many like you through life, unfortunately He joined the cohort and used it to attempt to bully me. He even suggested that only they should be allowed on technical threads. They should review anyone who was allowed to post on technical threads, they should be able to be the arbiters of what was right or wrong, judging everyone else with no exception and no appeal. They should control. Fortunately Admin is more astute than many here give them credit for and told them no. So there have, I am lead to believe from the little I have seen, been threats of not posting on the site etc unless they have their way. ED. Night night I am off to bed some of us have work to do tomorrow Yes there was a bit of that, although I think it was not too serious and I certainly didn't expect or tbh want it to be taken up. But importantly, it is indicative of the problem, ie one rogue poster who wants to threadbomb every technical thread with large volumes of rubbish so as to render those threads dysfunctional for purely selfish reasons. Oh and by the way "Admin" are not that interested either way. Inaction is so much easier than action!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2016 22:14:57 GMT
Geo is Graham. I was watching both profiles a while back, and one always posted on the other forum whilst using the other on here. It was consistent. Graham is geo, and geo is graham. It's a piece of piss to confuse the mods by simply changing dongles or sim cards. I should know, I do it often enough. So stop bullshitting geo.
|
|
|
Post by geo on Nov 28, 2016 22:17:39 GMT
He joined the cohort and used it to attempt to bully me. He even suggested that only they should be allowed on technical threads. They should review anyone who was allowed to post on technical threads, they should be able to be the arbiters of what was right or wrong, judging everyone else with no exception and no appeal. They should control. Fortunately Admin is more astute than many here give them credit for and told them no. So there have, I am lead to believe from the little I have seen, been threats of not posting on the site etc unless they have their way. ED. Night night I am off to bed some of us have work to do tomorrow You really do come out with some distorted crap Have a look at the last paragraph of this and work out what it would actually mean www.canalworld.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=88286&p=1922861Off to bed work tomorrow so no more time to search out other stuff
|
|
|
Post by geo on Nov 28, 2016 22:23:00 GMT
Geo is Graham. I was watching both profiles a while back, and one always posted on the other forum whilst using the other on here. It was consistent. Graham is geo, and geo is graham. It's a piece of piss to confuse the mods by simply changing dongles or sim cards. I should know, I do it often enough. So stop bullshitting geo. lol Well as I post off a ethernet link both here and in the office so I am not sure how I am not sure how I would change a sim card. So when was the last time you saw graham on? But you are wrong
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2016 22:25:21 GMT
Geo is Graham. I was watching both profiles a while back, and one always posted on the other forum whilst using the other on here. It was consistent. Graham is geo, and geo is graham. It's a piece of piss to confuse the mods by simply changing dongles or sim cards. I should know, I do it often enough. So stop bullshitting geo. lol Well as I post off a ethernet link both here and in the office so I am not sure how I am not sure how I would change a sim card. So when was the last time you saw graham on? But you are wrong Whatever. like I've often told my lad, you can't kid a kidder.
|
|
|
Post by geo on Nov 28, 2016 22:28:34 GMT
He joined the cohort and used it to attempt to bully me. He even suggested that only they should be allowed on technical threads. They should review anyone who was allowed to post on technical threads, they should be able to be the arbiters of what was right or wrong, judging everyone else with no exception and no appeal. They should control. Fortunately Admin is more astute than many here give them credit for and told them no. So there have, I am lead to believe from the little I have seen, been threats of not posting on the site etc unless they have their way. ED. Night night I am off to bed some of us have work to do tomorrow Yes there was a bit of that, although I think it was not too serious and I certainly didn't expect or tbh want it to be taken up. But importantly, it is indicative of the problem, ie one rogue poster who wants to threadbomb every technical thread with large volumes of rubbish so as to render those threads dysfunctional for purely selfish reasons. Oh and by the way "Admin" are not that interested either way. Inaction is so much easier than action! As I said they are very astute. I guess your ban was a trial to see how the place ran without you and it ran fine maybe even better than with you.
|
|
|
Post by JohnV on Nov 28, 2016 22:30:37 GMT
Oh I can work it out ok ..... I suggest you actually read it without a chip on your shoulder. If you consider that bullying then you are even more twisted than I gave you credit for. edit to add ..... peer review is a standard method of checking technical papers. Without it, any crap can get announced as the "truth"
|
|
|
Post by geo on Nov 28, 2016 22:31:01 GMT
lol Well as I post off a ethernet link both here and in the office so I am not sure how I am not sure how I would change a sim card. So when was the last time you saw graham on? But you are wrong Whatever. like I've often told my lad, you can't kid a kidder. I have no sense of humour so I don't try and kid people. I am a very serious straight person
|
|
|
Post by tonyqj on Nov 28, 2016 22:34:53 GMT
It reads to me that, being exasperated at seeing you argumentatively bomb yet another thread, TonyB suggested that Dan should consider appointing some technical adjudicators advising the mods. And that Dan couldn't be bothered. I don't see any use of the word cohort, and as Dan wasn't bothered I don't know how you think you can know who Dan might have chosen if he had been interested. I know that it isn't something I would be interested in, and I suspect TonyB wouldn't either. I don't know Nick very well and he can speak for himself anyway but I doubt he'd be interested either.
|
|
|
Post by tonyqj on Nov 28, 2016 22:41:22 GMT
... peer review is a standard method of checking technical papers. Without it, any crap can get announced as the "truth" Yep. I stumbled across a chemistry forum the other day and the members could vote answers up and down. It seemed a really good idea. Some answers were sitting at +8 and others at -3. Not being a chemistry buff myself the -3 looked as valid as the +8 which is why the idea appealed.
|
|
|
Post by geo on Nov 28, 2016 22:45:52 GMT
Oh I can work it out ok ..... I suggest you actually read it without a chip on your shoulder. If you consider that bullying then you are even more twisted than I gave you credit for. lol Of course I don't, but I cannot be bothered to dig up posts from weeks ago. You will believe whatever you want or go and look through his posts going back maybe three/four weeks. I really do not care less; I know the truth and that good enough for me. A good number of the early members on here have an axe to grind because they got banned. I suspect those bans were for the good of the forum, and no one can produce concrete evidence of malpractice at the forum by the Admin team, so that is what I have to believe. None of you are friends of mine and I owe you nothing. Friends to me are tangible beings, not myths that do not exist in reality only existing in a stream of electrons. Going to be a very cold night tonight in England, up to the north English border. I am going to my warm bed.
|
|
|
Post by smileypete on Nov 28, 2016 22:45:52 GMT
You and your friends have accused me of lots of things including not being me, you tried to take my name away, Geoff, for that I will not forgive any of you. You knew full well I was not your graham. Who from a quick look, it looks like you and your friends hounded him, maybe even committing a criminal offence. I can well understand why he is not here anymore from the little bits I have read. Did you get him banned, were you or your friends part of the list making group. Well that is strange, because you earlier claimed to be George!!! Believe what you like, you are extraordinary! But your second bit is correct, I've had the facility to use the site removed for the time being - 2 weeks. Is there an easy way to upload images to this site without going via a hosting site? If there is I'll post a screenshot of what I get when I attempt to do anything, which includes the time when "normal service will be resumed". I'm now pretty sure you are indeed graham. Sorry I am who? No my name is George, and there is no graham here. Sorry I am not going to post a picture of me here in my dressing gown to prove I am alone I would suggest that you need to get the site to make sure they did the job as anyone that looks at your profile is going to believe as I believe. So whoever you are you probably don't have a shred of credibility now....
|
|
|
Post by tonyqj on Nov 28, 2016 22:48:50 GMT
It definitely starts with a g...
|
|
|
Post by JohnV on Nov 28, 2016 22:50:19 GMT
Have we got a replacement for Chris Pink? next name Gordon ?
|
|