|
Post by Jim on May 8, 2023 8:08:02 GMT
There is an incredibly easy way to solve this problem.. "I’m afraid I’m unable to discuss the matter with you without the consent of Mr. Ward. If you can forward me such consent, it would be appreciated." just forward the consent. They are not asking you to swim the channel then run to Paris and go shopping in that famous department store naked to buy Jean Paul Gaultier perfume for delivery by hand to the Leeds offices. It is entirely reasonable to ask for proof of consent as you might just be a troll. I could understand why someone might think you are a troll as you do have quite a lot of the characteristics. Just send the proof of consent and you will be able to communicate. If you in fact don't have consent then you ARRR a troll. Simple. But, as I said, and Tony begrudgingly agreed (it hadn't occurred to that 5 blade razor mind), the letter of consent has to be from George, addressed to CRT, going through an authorised representative. Tony isn't authorised till Matthew has read the letter from George, which George can't send him. Catch 22. (currently being replayed on BBC R4X btw)
|
|
|
Post by Murgatroyd on May 8, 2023 8:09:20 GMT
I like this bit:
"or moving the boat from where it was"
|
|
|
Post by Jim on May 8, 2023 8:11:48 GMT
Tony is hanging on to George's coat tails in the hope that, if George succeeds, he can claim the credit. He's claiming to know what the restraining order says before he has seen it, in the hope that it will suit his needs. Shame Tony didn't have the bottle to have a lock in stand off himself when they confiscated his boats. Tony was in his house when CRT arrived to Section 8 his boat and by the time he'd arrived at it CRT had already taken control. Yeh, what's that old proverb? The stop-a-bed old bird loses all the worms. Or something like that. No use at all just tweeting from your nest.
|
|
|
Post by on May 8, 2023 8:27:31 GMT
But, as I said, and Tony begrudgingly agreed (it hadn't occurred to that 5 blade razor mind), the letter of consent has to be from George, addressed to CRT, going through an authorised representative. Tony isn't authorised till Matthew has read the letter from George, which George can't send him. Catch 22. (currently being replayed on BBC R4X btw) Mr Aymes asked Mr Dunkley to forward the consent. ". If you can forward me such consent, it would be appreciated." I read it as requesting a letter of consent addressed to Mr Dunkley from Mr Ward which Mr D then sends to Mr A. You are reading it as if the wording was "If you can ask Mr Ward to send me such consent..." which is not what was requested. I think this is a way of showing that Tony is in fact not in communication with Mr Ward other than in his imagination.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on May 8, 2023 8:34:20 GMT
But, as I said, and Tony begrudgingly agreed (it hadn't occurred to that 5 blade razor mind), the letter of consent has to be from George, addressed to CRT, going through an authorised representative. Tony isn't authorised till Matthew has read the letter from George, which George can't send him. Catch 22. (currently being replayed on BBC R4X btw) Mr Aymes asked Mr Dunkley to forward the consent. ". If you can forward me such consent, it would be appreciated." I read it as requesting a letter of consent addressed to Mr Dunkley from Mr Ward which Mr D then sends to Mr A. You are reading it as if the wording was "If you can ask Mr Ward to send me such consent..." which is not what was requested. I think this is a way of showing that Tony is in fact not in communication with Mr Ward other than in his imagination. I would imagine that the last thing George Ward would want is Tony Dunkley's involvement in his issues and have no doubt that his support group will have advised him that TDs involvement will do nothing other than damage his cause.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on May 8, 2023 14:35:53 GMT
May 5, 2023 Good afternoon, Mr. Dunkley. I’m afraid I’m unable to discuss the matter with you without the consent of Mr. Ward. If you can forward me such consent, it would be appreciated. You should note, however, that per our previous conversations about your incorrect interpretation of our lawful process (and related legislation) to remove boats from Trust waters, I disagree with any assertion of wrongdoing on the part of the Trust, which you make below. Regards Matthew Aymes National Customer Support Manager - Licence Support Apart from, or between, bouts of regurgitating selected snippets from the volumes of wilful tripe Lucy Barry - C&RT(Ltd)'s Solicitor-Advocate - has coached and instructed Matthew Aymes - C&RT(Ltd)'s National Customer Support Manager(sic) - in parroting on cue, . . have you given any thought, . . or at least the closest thing to thought that you're capable of, . . as to WHY, . . at Bradford-on-Avon on 19 April 2023, . . the Police refused to act on or assist with in enforcing the Court Order made against George Ward at Bristol County Court on 23 January 2023 ?
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 8, 2023 15:42:33 GMT
Yes yes Tony.
|
|
|
Post by Murgatroyd on May 8, 2023 16:13:09 GMT
But, as I said, and Tony begrudgingly agreed (it hadn't occurred to that 5 blade razor mind), the letter of consent has to be from George, addressed to CRT, going through an authorised representative. Tony isn't authorised till Matthew has read the letter from George, which George can't send him. Catch 22. (currently being replayed on BBC R4X btw) I think this is a way of showing that Tony is in fact not in communication with Mr Ward other than in his imagination. This is by far and away the most likely scenario.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on May 8, 2023 18:20:15 GMT
So what are you going to say when the boat gets towed away this week?
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on May 8, 2023 18:53:47 GMT
May 5, 2023 Good afternoon, Mr. Dunkley. I’m afraid I’m unable to discuss the matter with you without the consent of Mr. Ward. If you can forward me such consent, it would be appreciated. You should note, however, that per our previous conversations about your incorrect interpretation of our lawful process (and related legislation) to remove boats from Trust waters, I disagree with any assertion of wrongdoing on the part of the Trust, which you make below. Regards Matthew Aymes National Customer Support Manager - Licence Support [addressed to dogless] Apart from, or between, bouts of regurgitating selected snippets from the volumes of wilful tripe Lucy Barry - C&RT(Ltd)'s Solicitor-Advocate - has coached and instructed Matthew Aymes - C&RT(Ltd)'s National Customer Support Manager(sic) - in parroting on cue, . . have you given any thought, . . or at least the closest thing to thought that you're capable of, . . as to WHY, . . at Bradford-on-Avon on 19 April 2023, . . the Police refused to act on or assist with in enforcing the Court Order made against George Ward at Bristol County Court on 23 January 2023 ? Matthew Aymes is an inconseqential nobody, . . a C&RT(Ltd) 'mug' mouthpiece and C&RT(Ltd) Illegal & Connivance Services disposable puppet, . . and, like the now departed Stuart Garner, will only keep his position within this irremedially corrupt organisation for as long as he's useful as a 'front' for actioning and then successfully covering up its wilfully unlawful activities, . . without ever making mistakes that expose his taskmasters to the embarrassment of public exposure of their criminal wrongdoings. On 19 April 2023, at Bradford-on-Avon, Matthew Aymes made several just such mistakes, . . and had a mighty big slice of sheer bad luck to go with them. When Aymes made the phone call to the Police to ask them to attend and assist in enforcing a Court Order (part Declaration, part Injunction) that he and C&RT(Ltd) Solicitor-Advocate Lucy Barry were passing off as an Order having the combined effects of a Court issued/authorised Eviction Order and Warrant or Writ of Control in respect of George Ward's boat, the March Hare, he didn't get what he expected. He got an honest, conscientious, well trained Police Sergeant who was able to read and understand precisely what Aymes' and Barry's precious Court Order really was, and its meaning and intent, . . and following confirmation from the duty Inspector, . . refused to allow the Police to become complicit in Aymes' and Barry's dual offences of Fraud by False Representation and Misconduct in Public Office.
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 8, 2023 18:56:09 GMT
Could you repeat that Tony, there might be people who’ve not read it yet.
|
|
|
Post by Murgatroyd on May 9, 2023 6:33:56 GMT
Woofety-woof
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 9, 2023 6:34:41 GMT
You’d get taken seriously if you didn’t insult everyone.
|
|
|
Post by on May 9, 2023 6:37:39 GMT
Clickety clack
|
|
|
Post by on May 9, 2023 6:40:22 GMT
|
|