|
Post by Tony Dunkley on May 10, 2023 19:03:06 GMT
May 5, 2023 Good afternoon, Mr. Dunkley. I’m afraid I’m unable to discuss the matter with you without the consent of Mr. Ward. If you can forward me such consent, it would be appreciated. You should note, however, that per our previous conversations about your incorrect interpretation of our lawful process (and related legislatio n) to remove boats from Trust waters, I disagree with any assertion of wrongdoing on the part of the Trust, which you make below. Regards Matthew Aymes National Customer Support Manager - Licence Support What's the point behind that post, . . I wonder? Why would one thick but possibly honest idiot - Alice - quote a reply to an e-mail sent by a second thick but definitely dishonest idiot - C&RT(Ltd)'s Matthew Aymes - in which the second thick idiot ducks a question that he knows will incriminate him if answered, . . and adds nothing else except to reiterate the same tripe he's come out with before about the C&RT(Ltd) having a - "lawful process (and related legislation) to remove boats from Trust waters", . . when no such ' lawful process' exists, or ever has existed ? Perhaps Alice is simply feeling the need to identify more closely with someone with whom he shares so much, . . and so obviously looks up to, respects, and above all, believes implicitly. Sent to Deards [C&RT(Ltd)'s Head of Legal Fiction] and Aymes today in reply to :- (5 April 2023)
Good afternoon, Mr. Dunkley.
I’m afraid I’m unable to discuss the matter with you without the consent of Mr. Ward. If you can forward me such consent, it would be appreciated.
You should note, however, that per our previous conversations about your incorrect interpretation of our lawful process (and related legislation) to remove boats from Trust waters, I disagree with any assertion of wrongdoing on the part of the Trust, which you make below.
Regards Matthew Aymes National Customer Support Manager - Licence Support
________________________________________________________________________________ Re: Craft "March Hare" - Index No 68691 Mr Aymes,
I did not write to you on Friday 5 May inviting a discussion, nor did I expect any form of response other than your customary parroting of whatever you've been instructed in by your devious colleague Lucy Barry.
As Ms Barry is only too well aware, the only lawful means by which the Canal & River Trust can proceed with any form of action against Mr Ward is to exercise the statutory powers it actually does have under Section 8 of the British Waterways Act 1983. This would be to remove Mr Ward's boat, afloat, under tow if necessary, and with Mr Ward remaining in possession and on board, to another location of the Trust's choosing.
The one and only lawful alternative to the above, would be for the Trust to apply to the Bristol County Court and to ask that the Court enforce the terms of the Injunction at paragraphs 2) and 3) of the Order the Court made on 23 January 2023.
On 19 April 2023, the Police attending at your request correctly refused to assist or participate in either the Trust's intended unlawful eviction of Mr Ward from his boat, or the intented follow up to that unlawful eviction of depriving Mr Ward of his boat/home, with contents, by means of seizing and transporting it away to an undisclosed location.
Is it now the Trust's intention to proceed within the bounds of the statutory powers of boat removal, precisely as laid down in Section 8 of the BW Act 1983. Or is it to apply to the Court and ask that paragraphs 2) and 3) of the Order made on 23 January 2023.be enforced as the Court sees fit, after taking in account the contempt of Court and statute committed on 19 April 2023 when you and Ms Barry, acting for the Canal & River Trust, took it upon yourselves to assume the powers of the Court in wrongfully acting pursuant to the standard warning in respect of the seizure of assets issued and printed by the Court on the Order made on 23 January 2023.
Signed, A.K.Dunkley.
|
|
|
Post by on May 10, 2023 19:10:00 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on May 10, 2023 19:12:00 GMT
What's the point behind that post, . . I wonder? Why would one thick but possibly honest idiot - Alice - quote a reply to an e-mail sent by a second thick but definitely dishonest idiot - C&RT(Ltd)'s Matthew Aymes - in which the second thick idiot ducks a question that he knows will incriminate him if answered, . . and adds nothing else except to reiterate the same tripe he's come out with before about the C&RT(Ltd) having a - "lawful process (and related legislation) to remove boats from Trust waters", . . when no such ' lawful process' exists, or ever has existed ? Perhaps Alice is simply feeling the need to identify more closely with someone with whom he shares so much, . . and so obviously looks up to, respects, and above all, believes implicitly. Sent to Deards [C&RT(Ltd)'s Head of Legal Fiction] and Aymes today in reply to :- (5 April 2023)
Good afternoon, Mr. Dunkley.
I’m afraid I’m unable to discuss the matter with you without the consent of Mr. Ward. If you can forward me such consent, it would be appreciated.
You should note, however, that per our previous conversations about your incorrect interpretation of our lawful process (and related legislation) to remove boats from Trust waters, I disagree with any assertion of wrongdoing on the part of the Trust, which you make below.
Regards Matthew Aymes National Customer Support Manager - Licence Support
________________________________________________________________________________ Re: Craft "March Hare" - Index No 68691 Mr Aymes,
I did not write to you on Friday 5 May inviting a discussion, nor did I expect any form of response other than your customary parroting of whatever you've been instructed in by your devious colleague Lucy Barry.
As Ms Barry is only too well aware, the only lawful means by which the Canal & River Trust can proceed with any form of action against Mr Ward is to exercise the statutory powers it actually does have under Section 8 of the British Waterways Act 1983. This would be to remove Mr Ward's boat, afloat, under tow if necessary, and with Mr Ward remaining in possession and on board, to another location of the Trust's choosing.
The one and only lawful alternative to the above, would be for the Trust to apply to the Bristol County Court and to ask that the Court enforce the terms of the Injunction at paragraphs 2) and 3) of the Order the Court made on 23 January 2023.
On 19 April 2023, the Police attending at your request correctly refused to assist or participate in either the Trust's intended unlawful eviction of Mr Ward from his boat, or the intented follow up to that unlawful eviction of depriving Mr Ward of his boat/home, with contents, by means of seizing and transporting it away to an undisclosed location.
Is it now the Trust's intention to proceed within the bounds of the statutory powers of boat removal, precisely as laid down in Section 8 of the BW Act 1983. Or is it to apply to the Court and ask that paragraphs 2) and 3) of the Order made on 23 January 2023.be enforced as the Court sees fit, after taking in account the contempt of Court and statute committed on 19 April 2023 when you and Ms Barry, acting for the Canal & River Trust, took it upon yourselves to assume the powers of the Court in wrongfully acting pursuant to the standard warning in respect of the seizure of assets issued and printed by the Court on the Order made on 23 January 2023.
Signed, A.K.Dunkley.What part of "I’m afraid I’m unable to discuss the matter with you without the consent of Mr. Ward" did you not understand?
|
|
|
Post by on May 10, 2023 19:12:57 GMT
I think it was probably all of it.
|
|
|
Post by on May 10, 2023 19:13:22 GMT
Some people don't know when they are being told to fuck off.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on May 10, 2023 19:24:48 GMT
Some people don't know when they are being told to fuck off. I imagine CRT will simply ignore this and not reply.
|
|
|
Post by on May 10, 2023 19:25:13 GMT
... to exercise the statutory powers it actually does have under Section 8 of the British Waterways Act 1983. This would be to remove Mr Ward's boat, afloat, under tow if necessary, and with Mr Ward remaining in possession and on board, to another location of the Trust's choosing... A.K.Dunkley. You have to laugh really. We have a comedian and to be fair he is sort of propping up the TB forum in some ways. Tow the boat away with the geyser on board. I love it. Wide ranging sense of humour is always good to see. Thank you for this.
|
|
|
Post by on May 10, 2023 19:26:56 GMT
What do you call a dinosaur with no idea ?
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 10, 2023 19:27:42 GMT
Some people don't know when they are being told to fuck off. Water off a ducks back to Tony, he’s been told to fuck off so often.
|
|
|
Post by on May 10, 2023 19:29:18 GMT
He's probably like a coffee percolator. It takes a while to work.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on May 10, 2023 19:35:27 GMT
I'll be glad when this cunt's boat gets towed away and we get a bit of peace.
|
|
|
Post by on May 10, 2023 19:44:24 GMT
I think this one migbt have a way to go.
I bet there is going to be some connection with an old mama and a high court writ or something.
Tony and George seem like the type of chaps who could pull a good bird with money and influence.
Its a charm thing.
|
|
|
Post by Murgatroyd on May 10, 2023 19:49:49 GMT
What do you call a dinosaur with no idea ? Cluelesaurus
|
|
|
Post by on May 10, 2023 19:55:02 GMT
Thanks. I had no idea what the answer was.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on May 10, 2023 19:55:11 GMT
What do you call a dinosaur with no eyes?
|
|