|
Post by Mr Stabby on Jan 19, 2024 19:14:12 GMT
You don't think the economic migrant situation is one that needs to be addressed? How many would you allow in, a million, ten million, a hundred million? It is, as you relentlessly point out, a problem. I'd be interested to hear from Jim if he agrees that it is a problem, and if he does what the Labour Party would do to address the problem.
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Jan 19, 2024 19:36:17 GMT
It is, as you relentlessly point out, a problem. I'd be interested to hear from Jim if he agrees that it is a problem, and if he does what the Labour Party would do to address the problem. Sorry, I forgot that this is primarily a Jim-bashing thread. Although supposing the Tories make even one successful flight before the election, and further supposing that Labour win an outright majority, which is not a certainty, it will be interesting to see what the next gov chooses to do. What a lot of ifs and buts! Once again you are reminded that all other European countries have accepted many more migrants (France included!) than the UK. ETA Jim does not control Labour policy.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Jan 19, 2024 19:39:57 GMT
I thought the Tory whips practiced that herding all the ultra right MPs into the Yay division lobby for the Rwanda bill? You don't think the economic migrant situation is one that needs to be addressed? How many would you allow in, a million, ten million, a hundred million? How many deserving refugees you would allow in is perhaps more relevant to them, however, it depends partly on how many care home, nursing, doctors etc we are short of , given that many po white boys on housing estates are lazy, we've no chance of fulfilling all the roles we need with them.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Jan 19, 2024 19:45:32 GMT
I'd be interested to hear from Jim if he agrees that it is a problem, and if he does what the Labour Party would do to address the problem. Sorry, I forgot that this is primarily a Jim-bashing thread. Once again you are reminded that all other European countries have accepted many more migrants (France included!) than the UK. ETA Jim does not control Labour policy. Would that be the France which is 126% larger in land area than the UK? And since Jim has appointed himself the forum party political broadcast on behalf of the Labour Party, it's reasonable to question him on Labour Party policy.
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Jan 19, 2024 20:01:36 GMT
Sorry, I forgot that this is primarily a Jim-bashing thread. Once again you are reminded that all other European countries have accepted many more migrants (France included!) than the UK. ETA Jim does not control Labour policy. Would that be the France which is 126% larger in land area than the UK? And since Jim has appointed himself the forum party political broadcast on behalf of the Labour Party, it's reasonable to question him on Labour Party policy. Are you on the pop again?
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Jan 20, 2024 8:59:31 GMT
I thought the Tory whips practiced that herding all the ultra right MPs into the Yay division lobby for the Rwanda bill? You don't think the economic migrant situation is one that needs to be addressed? How many would you allow in, a million, ten million, a hundred million? Keep up at the back, the economic migrants are a small percentage of those seeking aid and succour. Depends on what skills we need at the time, e.g. maybe we need to bring down the price of food by cutting transport costs. I see this morning that refugees are now able to earn their keep and contribute to the society that has offered them aid and shelter, it must be great not to be a burden. It's inflamed a cohort of grumpy elderly men of course, they are apoplectic, with popping eyes, flying spittle and a florid cooked ham colour to their cheeks, spluttering indignation, led by the torygraph. I hope none of the poor souls turn up here, we don't have a defibrillator to hand.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Jan 20, 2024 9:04:45 GMT
You don't think the economic migrant situation is one that needs to be addressed? How many would you allow in, a million, ten million, a hundred million? Keep up at the back, the economic migrants are a small percentage of those seeking aid and succour. Depends on what skills we need at the time, e.g. maybe we need to bring down the price of food by cutting transport costs. I see. So basically you'd approve of lower wages for Working Class people. Maggie would be proud of you. Like I've always said, Labour are just Conservatives in red ties.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Jan 20, 2024 9:05:53 GMT
Would that be the France which is 126% larger in land area than the UK? And since Jim has appointed himself the forum party political broadcast on behalf of the Labour Party, it's reasonable to question him on Labour Party policy. Are you on the pop again? Long term acid damage!
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Jan 20, 2024 9:09:03 GMT
Keep up at the back, the economic migrants are a small percentage of those seeking aid and succour. Depends on what skills we need at the time, e.g. maybe we need to bring down the price of food by cutting transport costs. I see. So basically you'd approve of lower wages for Working Class people. Maggie would be proud of you. Like I've always said, Labour are just Conservatives in red ties. Not at all, but should we be paying people to play on the internet when their actual work is easily timed and already documented on a clock? I thought you would support market forces in action as a way to control costs for the many.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Jan 20, 2024 9:16:56 GMT
I see. So basically you'd approve of lower wages for Working Class people. Maggie would be proud of you. Like I've always said, Labour are just Conservatives in red ties. Not at all, but should we be paying people to play on the internet when their actual work is easily timed and already documented on a clock? I thought you would support market forces in action as a way to control costs for the many. WTF are you talking about, Clown?
|
|
|
Post by brummieboy on Jan 20, 2024 11:50:44 GMT
I see. So basically you'd approve of lower wages for Working Class people. Maggie would be proud of you. Like I've always said, Labour are just Conservatives in red ties. Not at all, but should we be paying people to play on the internet when their actual work is easily timed and already documented on a clock? I thought you would support market forces in action as a way to control costs for the many. So we deduct train drivers and bus drivers time waiting at stations and bus stops from their working paid hours? What a spiffing idea when they get paid for additional time taken to walk to the site of their choice for refreshment. If there are vacancies that people on benefits could do, then maybe those benefits should be at a level that focuses the recipients minds. Part of the deal for asylum seekers working is that they can 'negotiate accomodation rates in their hotels' . I doubt if that would be anywhere approaching the standard £100 per night, and no mention is made about collecting income tax and Natinal Insurance.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Jan 20, 2024 11:53:34 GMT
Not at all, but should we be paying people to play on the internet when their actual work is easily timed and already documented on a clock? I thought you would support market forces in action as a way to control costs for the many. So we deduct train drivers and bus drivers time waiting at stations and bus stops from their working paid hours? What a spiffing idea when they get paid for additional time taken to walk to the site of their choice for refreshment. If there are vacancies that people on benefits could do, then maybe the wages should be at a level that focuses the recipients minds. Part of the deal for asylum seekers working is that they can 'negotiate accomodation rates in their hotels' . I doubt if that would be anywhere approaching the standard £100 per night, and no mention is made about collecting income tax and Natinal Insurance. ftfy. Of course if they have a job they would be paying NI and tax if earning enough. That's just a red herring. It's only certain lorry drivers btw😂😂😂😂😂
|
|