Tony Dunkley Should Still Fuck Off and Start His Own Forum

Its funny that even with people 'ignoring' the troll it still gets to be the centre of attention.

Quite a giggle.

IF - and it's a big, bold, probably yellow IF - Mr Dunkley doesn't want us posting on "his" threads other posters should respect that - on the proviso that he doesn't post on any others' threads and go "off topic".   That way the mindless, vacuous drivel can carry on without causing anyone any angst.  

What do the panel think?

Here, above, is another glaring example of how Thunderboat's muddle-headed clique of mean-spirited bigots consistently go out of their way to confuse, misrepresent, or distort everything of mine they read and to which they reply.

Nowhere, and at NO time, contrary to what's implied above, have I ever indicated or sought to establish any form of 'ownership' over any thread or topic.  Nor have I ever raised any objection whatsoever to ANYONE posting relevant, considered, on-subject replies to anything I post, or in any thread or topic that I've posted in or originated.

What I HAVE objected to and resisted, and WILL continue to object to and resist, is the intended and all too frequent outcome of the constant monitoring, by a small readily identifiable number of active forum members, of everything I post, anywhere on the pages of this forum.   

It is plainly evident, from the pages of this forum, that the sole purpose behind this constant monitoring is to enable as rapid a response as possible to whatever I've said/posted, by way of over-posting with multiple posts of nothing but mindless, irrelevant, off-subject garbage. . . thereby making whatever I post/say significantly less visible, and much less likely to be seen or responded to by anyone wanting or trying to engage with me in an on-line conversation.

Once again, I'll take this opportunity to remind those who repeatedly engage in this sort of internet monitoring and harassment, that such conduct amounts to stalking under the relevant specific provisions of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 :-

                                                       www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/40/contents

Sounds reasonable. Is that the fatal flaw?

You are a poet and we didn't know it! Macgonegal had best look to his laurels.