|
Post by Aloysius on Apr 25, 2024 7:09:39 GMT
There's no genocide in Israel. Israel is within its rights to deconstruct the organisation which captured dozens of its citizens, without provocation. It's a Palestinian problem, not an israeli one, that the cowardly tactic of human shielding is in widespread use. This proves that this forum has not become CWDF. Over there, the Jew hating membership would have been backed by the jew hating moderation team and banned anyone having the temerity to make such a post. The termination of my own membership is proof of this.
If you really do think that there has been no provocation of the Palestinians over tens of years, then you have not been following the news and Israel's actions. This is in no way trying to justify what Hamas has done, but if you don't think they have been provoked you have a very shallow understanding of what has been going on.
You also don't seem to understand the difference between a Jew and an Israeli.
It's just posturing in the guise of humour not humour. Don't worry about it, it has nothing to do with Israel or Judaism. Someone clearly hasn't read the news yet or the posturing would be about something else entirely.
|
|
|
Post by Clinton Cool on Apr 25, 2024 7:18:18 GMT
There's no genocide in Israel. Israel is within its rights to deconstruct the organisation which captured dozens of its citizens, without provocation. It's a Palestinian problem, not an israeli one, that the cowardly tactic of human shielding is in widespread use. This proves that this forum has not become CWDF. Over there, the Jew hating membership would have been backed by the jew hating moderation team and banned anyone having the temerity to make such a post. The termination of my own membership is proof of this.
If you really do think that there has been no provocation of the Palestinians over tens of years, then you have not been following the news and Israel's actions. This is in no way trying to justify what Hamas has done, but if you don't think they have been provoked you have a very shallow understanding of what has been going on.
You also don't seem to understand the difference between a Jew and an Israeli.
Fair enough. There was provocation. Insufficient though, to justify the capture and storage in caves of dozens of innocent people. A campaign to wipe out the stain on he map that is Hammas is wholly justifiable. If the cowards of Hammas choose to hide in hospitals and schools that's the problem of Hammas, not Israel.
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Apr 25, 2024 7:20:34 GMT
one m
|
|
|
Post by Clinton Cool on Apr 25, 2024 7:21:23 GMT
Thank you sir.
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Apr 25, 2024 7:21:50 GMT
boney m
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Apr 25, 2024 7:22:29 GMT
If you really do think that there has been no provocation of the Palestinians over tens of years, then you have not been following the news and Israel's actions. This is in no way trying to justify what Hamas has done, but if you don't think they have been provoked you have a very shallow understanding of what has been going on.
You also don't seem to understand the difference between a Jew and an Israeli.
If the cowards of Hammas choose to hide in hospitals and schools that's the problem of Hammas, not Israel. Not really. Article 18 of the Geneva Convention stipulates that a building designated as a civilian hospital cannot be the target of attack.
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Apr 25, 2024 7:27:23 GMT
If the cowards of Hammas choose to hide in hospitals and schools that's the problem of Hammas, not Israel. Not really. Article 18 of the Geneva Convention stipulates that a building designated as a civilian hospital cannot be the target of attack. wossit say abaht airstrikes on nuclear reactors?
|
|
|
Post by Clinton Cool on Apr 25, 2024 7:33:22 GMT
If the cowards of Hammas choose to hide in hospitals and schools that's the problem of Hammas, not Israel. Not really. Article 18 of the Geneva Convention stipulates that a building designated as a civilian hospital cannot be the target of attack. When the Americans were pursuing Saddam Hussain/ Osama Bin Laden: Had either chosen to lay up in a public hospital should the forces be expected to lay down their arms in favour of a polite request to enter to effect a peaceful arrest? If such a request were refused, does this make a public hospital a refuge, where someone may disregard any aspect of home or international law, mastermind a campaign of inhumanity perhaps, with absolute impunity?
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Apr 25, 2024 7:36:52 GMT
good point.
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Apr 25, 2024 7:37:30 GMT
pointer sisters
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Apr 25, 2024 7:44:46 GMT
Not really.Β Article 18 of the Geneva Convention stipulates that a building designated as a civilian hospital cannot be the target of attack. When the Americans were pursuing Saddam Hussain/ Osama Bin Laden: Had either chosen to lay up in a public hospital should the forces be expected to lay down their arms in favour of a polite request to enter to effect a peaceful arrest? If such a request were refused, does this make a public hospital a refuge, where someone may disregard any aspect of home or international law, mastermind a campaign of inhumanity perhaps, with absolute impunity?Β Β Β What would you have done?
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Apr 25, 2024 7:53:50 GMT
I see what you did there. Clever.
|
|
|
Post by Clinton Cool on Apr 25, 2024 7:56:24 GMT
When the Americans were pursuing Saddam Hussain/ Osama Bin Laden: Had either chosen to lay up in a public hospital should the forces be expected to lay down their arms in favour of a polite request to enter to effect a peaceful arrest? If such a request were refused, does this make a public hospital a refuge, where someone may disregard any aspect of home or international law, mastermind a campaign of inhumanity perhaps, with absolute impunity? What would you have done? Irrelevant. Don't dodge the point. The point being, if you missed it, that international law/convention enables brutal organisations to hide out with impunity.
|
|
|
Post by β on Apr 25, 2024 8:01:27 GMT
If it was real war then the hospitals and medical facilities should have a few daisycutters dropped on them early on.
Degrade the enemy's ability to survive.
This would save a lot of lives and get the job done quicker.
International law governing warfare merely prolongs the wars and generated larger profits for the military industrial complex.
Hit hard, fast and degrade the enemy to the point where they will surrender.
Kill them all.
|
|
|
Post by tonyb on Apr 25, 2024 8:06:45 GMT
What would you have done? Irrelevant. Don't dodge the point. The point being, if you missed it, that international law/convention enables brutal organisations to hide out with impunity.
By the same token, pre the Hamas atrocities, international law/convention, and the UN allowed the Israelis to persecute and kill Palestinians, take land by force, and treat the Palestinians in those taken lands as second class citizens, if not sub human. As they sow, so they will reap is so true, the Hamas atrocities are rooted in the way Israel has ignored the international law and conventions you talk about.
|
|